Friday, March 14, 2025

Joe Badon’s Cinema of the Weird

On the Northshore of New Orleans, where things can get fairly unremarkable from time to time, lives a filmmaker and artist whose work I’ve found to be confounding, frustrating, and delightful in equal fits – and if you follow film news, you may have passed by his name. 

Joe Badon made some headlines last year when strong comparisons were drawn between his film The God Inside My Ear and Netflix’s Horse Girl. He took to Reddit and even posted a video to Youtube, laying out the observed similarities. While I can’t say much for the “controversy” (I have yet to stream Horse Girl), I can say that The God Inside My Ear was unlike anything I had seen prior to viewing. It’s a film of a very specific and very personal vision, incorporating many references to what must be inside memories and secret callbacks – the kind of things that make auteur theorists salivate. 

Joe Badon’s comparison video between The God Inside My Ear and Horse Girl

It wasn’t easy getting into Joe’s films. My initial review of The God Inside My Ear was a lukewarm 50/50, going so far as to call it “substance-less style.” To my light credit, I did write that the film was “worthwhile” and that I’d want to watch whatever Joe had next. No matter my original feelings, it was clear that something special had washed over, and something unique had arrived on Hollywood South’s radar: weird cinema. 

We could lump Jason Matherne and his Terror Optics krewe into the weird column, but they would just barely fit, being more late night-punk and gore-sploitation than anything. We certainly have more diverse filmmakers doing more eclectic films in our region than others are aware of (like greats Jonathan Jackson and Kenna Moore), but Joe Badon might be the most known figure in that crowd. And at the regional forefront of strange and peculiar movies, his work is only progressing.

There was a special event he held on July 14th at a speakeasy on Desire St., featuring a movie and music presentation to support his next project The Wheel of Heaven. And if a story can be told from the pictures taken, it’d say “Keep New Orleans Weird!” 

From Joe Badon’s Facebook post about the July 14th, 2021 event

I chatted with Joe Badon about his films, his influences, and what’s coming up next.

Keep it weird, Hollywood South. Please, keep it weird.

Bill Arceneaux: Having seen your feature films The God Inside My Ear and Sister Tempest, I would label your work as that of psychological tragedy. How would you describe your movies, why, and what do you believe are the influences? 

Joe Badon: I think we’ve come up with the term “Funeral Comedy” because we’re creating absurdist dark comedies wrapped up in tragedies. So imagine Andy Kaufman performing at your relative’s funeral. That’s kind of what we’re going for. That comes for my love of absurdist cinema, like Quentin Dupieux and David Lynch. 

BA: From dreamscapes to night terrors, from cheese and camp to worry and wickedness, you tend to craft stories as if from a cauldron of twisted bedtime tales. Where do you think these ideas come from, and where are they going?

JB: I’m trying to create what I call “Cinematic Mixtapes” because we’re cherry-picking lots of various contrasting genres, styles, and techniques to create mixtapes of all my favorite cinema. This comes from my love of weird music – mainly composer John Zorn who would do 10 to 20 different styles of music all in one song. 

BA: Who are the filmmakers – foreign or domestic, living or dead – you would most want to watch your films, and what would you like them to say after viewing?   

JB: I’d want my heroes to watch my films: Ken Russell, Alejandro Jodorowsky, David Lynch, Jared Hess, Mickey Reece, Miguel Llanso, Quentin Dupieux, Agnes Varda, Ingmar Bergman, (I could keep going lol). I would want their honest opinion with all the honest critiques. I’m sure it would kill me but I do love the truth. 

The official trailer for Joe’s second feature Sister Tempest

BA: New technologies, new mediums, and new global threats have been changing the way we watch and understand art for ages. For you, what are the biggest challenges an independent filmmaker can face now, and what can be done about it?

JB: It’s a double-edged sword because technology has made it to where anyone can make films. But because of that, there’s a TON of noise out there. Now there’s hundreds of film festivals and thousands of films made every year. 

So THE biggest challenge is being noticed above the noise by anyone who can actually fund your films. 

BA: I often scour Instagram for really imaginative and downright “weird” media, from zines to VHS collections to Gameboy mods to film critiques. What do you gravitate to when looking out for oddball cinema and art?  

JB: My favorite website for weird films is 366weirdmovies.com. I have found countless amazing films through that site. But I’m always looking for films, art, and music that are doing something that I’ve never heard or seen before. I’m on an eternal quest to find something new and different. I always feel like I’ve found a buried treasure when I find something truly unique. I don’t necessarily have to like it, it just has to feel ballsy and strange and it’s its own thing. 

BA: Are there any local filmmakers of the non-linear and wild that have caught your attention? 

JB: I’ve got some good friends doing some fun weird shit like Kyle Clements, Cami Roebuck, Josh Stephenson, and Jason Johnson (there’s TONS of weirdos in New Orleans but they are lesser-known). But as far as established local filmmakers that are doing strange avant-garde shit? I have no idea! I’d love to meet and collaborate with them! 

I always feel like New Orleans film/art/music should be much weirder than it is. Take that for what it is. 

BA: You’re Kickstarting a new short film project at the moment. Please tell us about the planned movie, what it’ll take to bring it to life, and what you want to do once it has been completed. 

JB: So the new film is called The Wheel of Heaven. It’s about a woman named Purity whose car breaks down on the side of the road. She’s invited into an old mysterious house that is filled with weird party guests and an even weirder party host. It’s at this party that her true destiny is revealed. I’ve been telling people that it’s kind of like Rocky Horror meets Hour of the Wolf

We’re running a Kickstarter campaign until July 22nd. We’re asking for $20,000. This will pay for everything: Props, wardrobe, locations, food, set construction, post-production, etc… We’re creating this short film with the intention and hopes of getting it into bigger film festivals (like SXSW, Tiff, Sundance, Fantastic Fest, etc…) 

Having only made feature films in the past, I have realized it’s much easier to get shorts into the bigger festivals. And hopefully, with bigger festivals, we’ll get bigger connections which will lead to bigger budgets. So this film is an essential stepping stone to move forward as a filmmaker. 

BA: List three surreal movies that you’d like to watch on the last day of your life, and why you chose them. 

JB: Holy Mountain, Endless Poetry, and My Dinner with Andre. All these films put a lot of things into perspective for me. They show me what’s important in life and what’s not. 

Joe Badon, directing a scene for one of his films.

The Epic Lives of Edwin W. Edwards, 1927-2021

Edwin W. Edwards on stage at the University of Southwest Louisiana (now known as the University of Louisiana at Lafayette) during his 1983 “comeback” campaign for governor. Photo credit: Philip Gould.

“I have always loved Louisiana, its people, its bayous, its land, and its eternal joie d’vie. That’s my hope for you: That you will never lose your love for living.” 

—Gov. Edwin W. Edwards

Earl K. Long once surmised that the “ideal” governor of Louisiana would be “a Frenchman with an English-sounding name who was a Catholic and could speak French.” The irascible and wily younger brother of the martyred Kingfish, “Uncle Earl,” as he famously called himself, wasn’t describing anyone in particular; he was attempting to solve a riddle at the crux of Louisiana politics.

Louisiana is really three states, argued John Treen, younger brother of former Gov. Dave Treen and a longtime GOP operative who had the unique misfortune of narrowly losing a campaign for the state legislature to white supremacist leader David Duke despite being publicly endorsed by both President George H. W. Bush and former President Ronald Reagan. “The North and the Northshore are Republican. New Orleans is Democratic,” he explained to Christopher Tidmore of Louisiana Weekly a few years ago. “How the Cajuns vote swings elections. So goes Acadiana, so goes Louisiana.” Treen, who passed away from covid-19 last year at the age of 94, understood the state’s map much in the same way Long did, though, importantly, during Long’s time, Louisiana was a one-party state.

Had he lived another 20 years, Uncle Earl would have doubtlessly insisted that he had prophesied the political career of four-term Louisiana Gov. Edwin Washington Edwards, the only person to have occupied the office longer than he had. Edwards was a civil rights crusader, the driving force behind the 1974 state constitution (which is still the newest state constitution in the country), and the only person in the state’s history to have served on all three levels and, thanks to a brief stint as an ad hoc judge on the state supreme court in 1980, in all three branches of government.

In 1991, he made the second extraordinary comeback of his career and did one thing that John Treen couldn’t: He kicked David Duke’s lily-white derriere so bad that every other person named David Duke in the entire world suddenly either began calling themselves “Dave” or “Davey” or permanently installed an initial in the middle of their name.

On Monday, July 12, 2021 at 7 a.m., Edwards died inside of his home in suburban Baton Rouge. His final words, delivered to his seven-year-old son Eli Wallace Edwards, were “I love you too.” He was 93 years old.

Whereas the Long political dynasty sprawled over Louisiana politics for more than a century, beginning with Julius Long’s election as District Attorney of Winn and Jackson Parishes in 1912, six years before Huey won a seat on the state Railroad Commission, and ending only a year ago when term limits prevented their Republican third cousin Gerald from running again for the state Senate, Edwards remained a towering and singular presence for nearly seven decades.

Within the past 22 months, former Louisiana Govs. Buddy Roemer, Mike Foster, and Kathleen Babineaux Blanco have also died, which means as of this writing, 50-year-old Bobby Jindal is now Louisiana’s only living former governor. “Our condolences for the Edwards family. We keep them in our prayers,” Jindal wrote in an awkwardly paltry tweet, which failed to distinguish between the family of one of his predecessors and the family of the current governor, John Bel Edwards.

Edwin Edwards was, in many ways, the complete opposite of a politician like Jindal: A lifelong Democrat who championed the poor and believed in a government that did things, preternaturally charismatic, devastatingly quick-witted, irreverent, bombastic, and in command of a weapons-grade sense of humor. His political longevity and the durability of his popularity were always a mystery to his opponents, who saw corruption and graft in everything he touched and who used the machinery of the federal government to embark on a decades-long series of investigations into his personal and professional affairs, culminating in his conviction in May of 2000 on conspiracy charges related to the issuance of casino licenses. For his part, Edwards steadfastly maintained his innocence, and the decision of the trial judge, Frank Polozola, to sentence the 73-year-old former governor to ten years behind bars prompted many, including former President George H. W. Bush and former Gov. Treen, to lobby for Edwards to be granted a presidential pardon. Despite widespread claims to the contrary, none of Edwards’ convictions involved actions he had taken while in office or the misappropriation or theft of any public monies.

I first met Edwin Edwards seven years ago, in late June of 2014 and at the beginning of what would be the most astonishing and likely the most joyous chapter of his life. He was two months shy of his 87th birthday. Three and a half years before, he walked out of the federal penitentiary in Oakdale, Louisiana, having completed eight years of the ten year sentence that many believed amounted to handing him the death penalty. He was remarried to Trina Grimes, a beautiful, razor-sharp blonde woman still in her mid-thirties, and together, they were raising their infant son. Oh, and he’d just launched a campaign for the United States Congress. (The last time he served in Congress, neither his wife nor his opponent had been born). At the time, I was living in Dallas, gearing up for my final year in law school, but when Trina passed along word that Edwards had agreed to sit for an interview with me, I hauled it down to Baton Rouge too fast for anyone to begin rethinking the campaign’s schedule. I had prepared some serious policy questions—about efforts to legislate litigation against Big Oil out of court and the troubling procession of bills by White men to restrict the ability of women to make their own healthcare decisions. But before things immediately jumped into policy, I figured an ice breaker that would surely make things—really, make me—less anxious.

Like his wife Trina, I told him, I was originally from Alexandria, only 35 minutes down the road from Marksville, which, as everyone knows, was his birth place and ancestral home. Right?

“Well, that’s not quite right,” he told me. “Have you ever heard of a dot on the map called Moncla?”

“I guess I know some of the Moncla family, but I didn’t know they had their own village,” I said.

“Used to be an old post office. Moncla. Write it down. That’s where I was born.” Details like these mattered to Edwards.

He was an easy conversationalist, and believe it or not, for a time, an active emailer. In private, he could sometimes come across as soft-spoken or even bashful. It was an aspect of his persona mentioned all of the time.

In 1974, during the middle of Edwards’ first term as governor, Roy Reed, the renowned Arkansan journalist who covered the civil rights movement for the New York Times, visited Marksville with the hope of understanding the unique appeal of Louisiana’s most prominent Cajun.

“[U]nlike most Cajuns, [Edwards] does not drink. He detests smoking,” Reed wrote. “One of his brothers calls him an introvert who has spent all his life trying to be an extrovert. His friends say he never reveals much of himself. He never explodes, either in anger or laughter. His English is French‐accented, but he speaks softly.

“‘He’s not relaxed like the normal Frenchman,’ Ralph Schwartzenburg of Marksville, his brother‐in‐law, said, as he sat in his parents’ kitchen one day this week.

“To which his mother, the Governor’s mother‐in‐law, replied in a fond, even voice, ‘Maybe that’s because he’s ambitious.'”

In 1983, after trouncing incumbent Republican Gov. Dave Treen by a staggering 26 points in the primary election, carrying 62 of the state’s 64 parishes, and becoming the first gubernatorial candidate in Louisiana history to secure over 1,000,000 votes, a record he would repeat in 1991, Edwin Edwards won a third term in office. But the victory came at a steep price. The 1983 Louisiana gubernatorial primary campaign, according to the New York Times, was the “most expensive non-presidential election in the nation’s history,” and the Edwards campaign was reportedly saddled with $4 million in outstanding campaign debt. To clear their debts, Edwin along with his brother Marion planned the most audacious and largest single campaign fundraiser in American history, selling 617 of “their closest friends” a $10,000 ticket so they could spend “a week tracing Louisiana’s roots back to the Eiffel Tower, the Brussels City Hall, the Crazy Horse Saloon, the Hotel George V and other points of interest.” Acclaimed Lafayette-based photojournalist Philip Gould serendipitously found himself in Paris that summer and tagged along for the wild ride.



“I was destined, I thought, when I was born to be a king. And tonight, I can be.”

— Gov. Edwin W. Edwards, speaking at the Palace of Versailles Hall of Mirrors of King Louis XIV (namesake of Louisiana), Jan. 21, 1984.

Edwin Washington Edwards was born in Moncla, Louisiana on August 7, 1927, the third of Clarence Washington “Bo-Boy” and Agnès Brouillette Edwards’ five children. Despite his Welsh surname, which can be traced back to, among others, the swashbuckling 18th century pirate Robert Edwards, he was decidedly a descendant of French immigrants, on both sides of his family. Edwin Edwards was also a Brouillette, a Bordelon, a Laborde, a Dupuy, and a Gagnard. However, although popularly characterized as a Cajun, Edwards did not have Acadian ancestry.

Like the majority of Avoyelles Parish natives of his generation, Edwards learned to speak French at home and English in school. As he frequently recounted throughout his political career, his father was a sharecropper, and his mother was a midwife, assisting with the delivery of hundreds of babies in the early part of the 20th century. While he took particular pride over his working class roots, his family were also among the most prominent and well-respected in the region and included several political leaders, dating back more than two centuries. In the 1780s, when Louisiana was part of the Viceroyalty of New Spain, his maternal 3rd-great-grandfather Jacques Gagnard was appointed to serve as the first commandant of the Avoyelles Military Post.

William Edwards, his paternal great-great-grandfather, was a wealthy and politically active planter whose home stood as a local landmark until it was dismantled in 1969. William, who moved to Avoyelles from Kentucky in 1826, was staunchly opposed to secession, a position that put him at odds with many of his neighbors and ultimately resulted in his murder in May of 1862, a story that earned national attention and became a part of local legend. He was killed, the story goes, by a group of Confederate cotton-burners after intervening to prevent the execution of an elderly man “arrested as a spy.” The man had been dispatched to the region by the New Orleans Subsistence Committee “to obtain food to feed the wives and children of the soldiers who were away in the Confederate army” and “would have been hung had not William Edwards and his two sons gone to [his] assistance,” according to a report that appeared in the New York Times on July 13, 1862. William Edwards named all of his sons after prominent Americans: Stephen Decatur Edwards, Thomas Jefferson Edwards, James Madison Edwards, Patrick Henry Edwards, Henry Clay Edwards, Oliver Perry Edwards, Benjamin Franklin Edwards, and Edwin’s great-grandfather, William Washington Edwards.

When he was still a small child, his family moved from Johnson Settlement, north of Marksville, to a home west of town, in an area known as Gum Ridge.

After the newly-created Rural Electric Authority began lighting up the countryside, young Edwin taught himself the basics of electrical work, scrounged together enough to buy copper wiring from the local Western Auto, and then hooked up his family’s home. “We were the envy of the neighborhood,” he recalled to biographer Leo Honeycutt, “and I helped neighbors wire their homes. It would not have passed inspection but did basically work and did not set fire to anyone’s home, thank God.”

In his early teens, he joined his paternal grandmother in the congregation of the local Nazarene Church, initially because the church’s regular services offered him the easiest means of transportation into town. The church also gave him his first opportunity behind the pulpit, and eventually, he fashioned himself as a teenage preacher. Borrowing heavily from John Wesley as well as the evangelical Holiness Movement popular in America at the turn of the century, the Nazarenes emphasized discipline, austerity, and helping the poor. Nazarenes were told to abstain from drinking and smoking; sex before or outside of marriage was a sin, and women weren’t allowed to cut their hair or wear anything short enough to show their knees. Like his grandmother, Edwin enjoyed the Nazarene community but didn’t care too much for the Nazarene dogma. Still, he liked the idea of helping and not judging the poor, and his brief tenure as a youth minister gave him as good of a reason as any to read the Bible, front to finish. It also allowed him to hone his skills as a public speaker and taught him the importance of mixing heavy doses of humor into his routine.

He wasn’t born to be a preacher, though. As he got older, he became more skeptical about not just the Nazarene Church but about organized religion in general. It was hard for him to overlook the hypocrisies, all of the holy men who never really practiced what they preached, and he knew far too many people who were waiting on a miracle that was never going to happen. Eventually, he returned to his mother’s Catholic Church, largely at the urging of his first wife Elaine, though he would regularly express his doubts about the “supernatural.”

At his 90th birthday celebration, Edwards recalled bringing Elaine, her mother, and his mother to Jimmy Carter’s White House for a private audience with Pope John Paul II. “I met with him, asked him to hear my confession. He declined,” Edwards joked, “because he said he’d only be in town three days.”

Indeed, what was unusual about Edwards—at least unusual in comparison with other Louisiana politicians— was that he was always upfront about his skepticism. This perhaps explains, in part, why he was uniquely popular among evangelicals.

“We as ministers helped put him in Congress,” Bishop G.A. Mangun told The Town Talk on the first day of Edwards’ fourth term as governor. After moving to Louisiana in 1950, Mangun transformed Alexandria’s 38-member First United Pentecostal Church into the 2,200-member Pentecostals of Alexandria, one of the largest Pentecostal churches in the nation. “We’ve been with him all the way through.”

Indeed, in his prime, Edwards could have taught a masterclass in what political candidates need to do to win over an entire congregation. During his campaign for a third term in 1983, after receiving a rousing reception at the Winnfield United Pentecostal Church in rural Winn Parish, a reporter asked the church’s pastor, Rev. Clarence D. Bates, how he could support Edwin Edwards, a man who “gambled, chased women, laughed about lying, and was constantly under investigation for corruption.” 

“Well, he doesn’t drink or smoke,” the preacher replied.     

Portraits of a Governor as a Young Man. Courtesy: Edwards Family. Colorized by Lamar White, Jr.

“I asked my father why the bus did not pick them up since their school was on the way to ours. I remember his words: ‘That is one of the many unfair things about life that will be changed someday and maybe in your lifetime and maybe with your help.’ He was right. Everyone talked about fairness and equality, but when it came to Negroes, no one talked of fairness and equality. I felt sorry for those kids and felt worse for being on the bus. I vowed then that I would not deal in the hypocrisy I saw all around me. These images stick in my head to this day. We worked with and dealt with ‘colored folks,’ called that at the time, in the fields and in our little country store which my father operated in the late 1930s and 40s. These events and my father’s compassion had a large influence on my life, attitude, and political career.”

—Gov. Edwin W. Edwards

At 17, Edwards left Marksville for LSU and after his freshman year, took a train to California, where the Navy taught him how to fly an airplane. The war ended before he completed the training, but because he’d enlisted, LSU let him breeze through his undergraduate degree and right into law school. He was only 21 when he became a member of the Louisiana Bar Association.

In 1949, he married his childhood sweetheart and the mother of four of his five children, Elaine Schwartzenburg, and together, they moved to the town of Crowley in Acadia Parish, primarily because, as he would claim later, there were far fewer French-speaking lawyers in Crowley than in Marksville. But it also helped that his older sister Audrey and her husband, a Nazarene preacher, had moved there a few years before.

He began his political career in 1954, winning an at-large seat on the Crowley City Council after making the practically unheard of decision to run on a ticket that included two Black candidates. At the time, his position on civil rights put him far to the left of the vast majority of White Democrats in Louisiana, but it also put him on the radar. He became a close and personal friend of two of the state’s most prominent young progressives, Crowley city judge Edmund Reggie and Alexandria attorney Camille Gravel, who also served as the Louisiana Democratic Party’s National Committeeman. Gravel and Reggie had a strained relationship with Gov. Earl K. Long, who, as the state’s highest elected Democrat ordinarily would have been provided deference with respect to how Louisiana’s delegates would be allocated during the Democratic National Convention, but when Long left the 1956 DNC a day early, Gravel and Reggie were the only Southerners willing to take an active part in a plan for a surprise surge of support behind U.S. Sen. John F. Kennedy as a nominee for Vice President. The gambit worked flawlessly for JFK: He fell short of the nomination to Tennessee’s Estes Kefauver, but by the end of the convention, Kennedy would already be considered the presumptive frontrunner for the party’s presidential nomination in 1960. For their early loyalty to the Kennedy clan, both men were tasked with overseeing the campaign’s operations in Louisiana, which began, albeit unofficially, after Kennedy accepted Reggie’s invitation to the 23rd annual International Rice Festival in Crowley in October of 1959.

An estimated 135,000 people showed up to the festival that year, more than 100,000 than ever before, setting the stage for a 32-year-old councilman named Edwin W. Edwards to serve as the master of ceremonies. (Decades later, Reggie, whose family owned a vacation home near the Kennedy compound in Hyannis Port, became Sen. Ted Kennedy’s father-in-law after his daughter Vickie married the legendary senator in 1992).

In 1964, Edwards scored an upset victory for a seat in the Louisiana state Senate against 30-year veteran legislator and well-known local real estate developer Bill Cleveland in the Democratic primary election. Gov. John McKeithen tasked Edwards as his floor leader in the legislature’s upper chamber, a role that he would keep for less than two years before, at the urging of Camille Gravel, he decided to run for the now-defunct Seventh Congressional District, a seat that had become suddenly empty after Congressman T. Ashton Thompson was killed in a car accident in North Carolina. Edwards was initially elected to serve the remainder of Thompson’s unexpired term.

Whereas Thompson of Ville Platte had been an ardent segregationist and a signatory of the so-called “Southern Manifesto,” the young Edwards was a liberal populist, an admirer of Huey P. Long’s style and Franklin D. Roosevelt’s substance. He hadn’t taken the oath of office in time to vote for the 1965 Voting Rights Act, but in 1966 and then again in 1970, when Congress considered five-year extensions of the law, Edwards was one of the handful of Southerners who supported its passage. Louisiana Congressman Hale Boggs was among one of the few others.

On the same day that Richard Nixon won the White House while Louisiana handed Alabama segregationist Gov. George Wallace the state’s ten electoral votes, Edwards coasted to another term in Congress by winning the support of a staggering 80% of his district’s voters.

Edwards won an early battle on quotas on rice production against Agriculture Secretary Orville Freeman, convincing President Lyndon B. Johnson to overrule Freeman and keep the quotas in place, and he soon became a member of LBJ’s inner circle.

“With very few exceptions, my career in Congress was very non-productive. Most of the legislation passed by large majorities,” Edwards acknowledged to Honeycutt. “They were meaningless paper tigers, legislation that didn’t matter to the country whether they passed or didn’t pass. Very few things were controversial. I was, however, a close political friend of President Lyndon Johnson.”

Congress was also where Edwards would collect the first major scandal of his career, though the story wouldn’t emerge until four years after he left Capitol Hill. In 1971, for reasons that Edwards could never convincingly explain, his wife Elaine accepted $10,000 (the equivalent of about $70,000 today) from South Korean businessman Tongsun Park, who was later revealed to have been working on behalf of the Korean Central Intelligence Agency with the presumed goal of influencing Democratic lawmakers to reverse President Nixon’s decision to withdraw American troops. All told, Park distributed cash to 30 members of Congress, ten of whom were implicated directly in the scandal. Edwards claimed Park was a personal friend of his wife and that the money was intended to be a gift. The explanation strained credulity, but the gift was only a fraction of the sums Park doled out to others. The Edwardses were never charged with any wrongdoing. Two congressmen, including Louisiana’s Otto Passman, were. U.S. Rep. Richard Hanna was convicted and sentenced to a year in prison. Passman, whose defense team was led by Camille Gravel, was acquitted after a jury trial in Louisiana. Regardless of what Park’s actual intention had been in providing the $10,000 gift, Edwards already had one foot out of the House’s door.

Louisiana voters were interviewing applicants for the job Edwards had always wanted. On Feb. 1, 1972, they would elect Louisiana’s 50th governor, but for Edwards to prevail, he first needed to beat a field of 16 other Democrats, including the state’s incumbent lieutenant governor, a powerful state senator from Shreveport, a former U.S. representative and a current one, both of whom also happened to be members of the Long family, and a two-term former governor who would always be better known for the song “You Are My Sunshine.”

From left to right: U.S. Sen. John F. Kennedy, Al Brinker, and Crowley City Councilman Edwin Edwards at the 23rd annual International Rice Festival on Oct. 16, 1959. Courtesy of the family of Edmund Reggie. Colorized by Lamar White, Jr.
U.S. Sen. John F. Kennedy and Crowley city judge Edmund Reggie at a reception honoring the Massachusetts Demcocrat at the home of Reggie’s in-laws, Frem and Beatrice Boustany. Years later, during an interview with the Kennedy Library, Judge Reggie recalled that following the reception Kennedy and others decided to go swimming in the family’s backyard pool, after which Kennedy retreated to the master bedroom to change out of his swim suit and back into his business attire. Reggie’s mother, who was unaware that Kennedy was occupying the room, walked into find a stark-naked JFK. “My wife says that my mother, who is a very deeply religious woman and goes to mass and communion, made the sign of the cross in Arabic very quickly, of course, knowing that it would dispel Beelzebub and make it all okay,” Reggie said. Judge Reggie was one of Edwin Edwards’ closest friends and confidants and served as his Executive Counsel during the final year of Edwards’ second term. Photo credit: Reggie family archives.
Edwin Edwards taking the oath of office after winning a special election to replace the late U.S. Rep. Theo Ashton Thompson in Congress. Edwards would later win three full terms, representing Louisiana’s now-defunct 7th Congressional District.

Edwin Edwards knew one thing for certain about the 1971-1972 race for Louisiana governor: Dave Treen, a Metairie Republican who had struck out in the 60s against incumbent Democratic Congressman Hale Boggs, losing in 1962, 1964, and 1968, was going to lose again. Nearly all 17 of the Democratic candidates could have defeated Treen, with the exception of a white supremacist named Addison Roswell Thompson and Dave Chandler, stringer for Life Magazine who had recently single-handedly ended outgoing Gov. John McKeithen’s future political prospects by writing a series of sensational and cynically deceitful stories that alleged Carlos Marcello—not “Big John”—ran things in Baton Rouge. Chandler decided to qualify as a candidate for governor, he said, because he wanted to write a book about it. This assessment—that Treen, the presumptive Republican nominee (He would beat Robert Max Ross in the party primary with more than 92% of the vote) had no chance in the general election was not a personal judgment of Treen; it merely reflected the political reality at the time.

Louisiana had been a one-party state since the late 19th century, not long after the end of Reconstruction. This meant that all of the stagecraftng, the roles, the secret alliances, the stalking and Trojan horses had to get sorted out first. Edwards seemed to be the presumed frontrunner, but in a field so large, it’s not always easy to know. State Sen. J. Bennett Johnston was also a force with whom to be reckoned: Young, ambitious, reasonably moderate, and presumably in command of North Louisiana. He pivoted to the right of Edwards, hoping to campaign as a coalition candidate. Former Gov. Jimmie Davis’ late entrance into the contest, which had been cooked up by political consultant Gus Weill, cut into Johnston’s territory but hardly moved the dial. Edwards took first in the primary, 23.54% to Johnston’s 17.79%, but the Democratic runoff was a nail-bitter. Throughout most of the night, as the urban votes arrived first, Johnston appeared to be cruising to a victory, but Edwards began tacking on big margins in rural parishes, particularly in Acadiana. He beat Johnston by a razor thin 50.2% and then easily defeated Treen in the February general election.

When Edwards and his wife Elaine moved their family into the Governor’s Mansion on May 9, 1972, a couple of miles down the street, a pair of new parents in Baton Rouge, John and Cynthia Graves, were still welcoming an addition to their family home, a baby boy they named Garret.

“To the poor, the elderly, the unemployed, the thousands of black Louisianians who have not yet enjoyed the full bounty of the American dream, we extend not a palm with alms, but the hand of friendship.” 

—Gov. Edwin W. Edwards

When Edwin Washington Edwards took charge of Louisiana in 1972, state government was clunky, outmoded, bloated, and almost exclusively White. Whereas Huey P. Long modernized the state’s physical infrastructure, famously paving thousands of miles of roads and highways, building bridges, schools, hospitals, and even a new skyscraper Capitol, Edwin Edwards can rightfully be credited with modernizing the human infrastructure of state government and transforming the mechanics of civil society to better ensure fairness, inclusion, and diversity. As Judge Reggie once noted, Edwards’ most significant accomplishments as governor weren’t tangible things stamped with his name; they were often ministerial or legalistic.

His first order of business as governor was to scrap the state’s closed party primary elections in favor of an open nonpartisan system known as “the jungle primary,” a calculated risk for Democrats but obviously appealing to a populist like Edwards. In late July, after the death of U.S. Sen. Allen Ellender, Edwards appointed his wife Elaine to fill the seat temporarily, and thus, for 12 weeks, she served as only the second woman to represent Louisiana in Congress. Huey P. Long’s widow, Rose McConnell Long, was the first.

He would wait until his second year in office before embarking on the most ambitious item on his agenda: The adoption of a new state constitution.

His predecessor, John McKeithen, had been the first governor in the 20th century to serve two consecutive terms, the result of a change in state law (and his successful reelection), but toward the end of his second term, McKeithen’s popularity took a nosedive, primarily due to public frustration over the construction of the Superdome and fallout over a sensational series of reports in Life magazine—later found to be scurrilous and false after a year-long investigation by a state legislative committee— that reputed New Orleans Mafia boss Carlos Marcello had taken control of state government. Edwards had inherited a state that seemed mired in the doldrums and injected it with a spirit of vitality and optimism. During his first two terms, press coverage of “Louisiana’s colorful Cajun governor” was overwhelmingly positive, often to the point of seeming obsequious. In one article published across the state, a reporter wondered whether Edwards could be considered too handsome.

To be sure, as the controversy over Tongsun Park proved, Edwards could sometimes be too clever for his own good, and by his own admission, his relationships with “shady” individuals and willingness to conduct private business with people involved in government invited suspicion. However, the portrayal of Edwards as a “crook,” a word that his supporters would later irreverently embrace to juxtapose him against white supremacist David Duke, first entered the public consciousness as a result of a case that had nothing to do with him: The criminal investigation and subsequent conviction of Charles “Budgie” Roemer, Edwards’ Commissioner of Administration and the father of future Gov. Buddy Roemer.

In 1979, with Edwards on his way out of office, Roemer, who agreed to serve as treasurer for the gubernatorial campaign of state Sen. Sonny Mouton, had a series of discussions with three insurance brokers in business with Carlos Marcello. They were attempting to sell the state’s next governor on a deal that they claimed would save Louisiana taxpayers $1 million a year, and to demonstrate their commitment, they provided Roemer with a $25,000 donation for the Mouton campaign. Unfortunately for Roemer, who initially neglected to record the donation on campaign finance reports, two of the men were undercover FBI agents, and the other was a convicted fraudster who had agreed to connect them with Marcello in exchange for a reduced sentence. The FBI sting, codenamed Brilab, and subsequent trial dominated the news. But despite securing convictions against Marcello and Roemer (which were later vacated as a result of a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court), the Department of Justice and U.S. Attorney John Volz engaged in a series of highly problematic and ethically questionable, if not reckless, actions in pursuing and then prosecuting the case (including injecting considerable sums of money into the campaigns of multiple gubernatorial candidates). By falsely creating the impression to the public that Edwards was somehow involved, Volz, who had been appointed to the job by President Carter in 1978 but switched to the Republican Party in 1980 to ensure favorability with Ronald Reagan, gave himself the pretext to sell his next blockbuster case.

Edwards was succeeded in office by Dave Treen, his former rival in the 1972 gubernatorial general election. Treen, who, in 1972, had become Louisiana’s first Republican congressman since Reconstruction, was now the state’s first Republican governor since Reconstruction as well. Treen’s narrow victory, which was facilitated by infighting among Democrats, was, in many ways, the best possible outcome for Edwards, who could legally run for a third term in 1983 without having to challenge a Democratic incumbent.

The 1979 contest had been the most expensive non-presidential election in American history, but it would lose that distinction only four years later when Edwin Edwards made his first of two extraordinary political comebacks, with one of the most memorable and masterful campaigns in state history. Louisiana was flush with cash, the consequence of a change in how the state calculated the severance from oil and gas that Edwards had enacted years before, and clearly, it was willing to let the good times keep rolling. (The story of the 1983 election was chronicled in John Maginnis’ spectacular book The Last Hayride).

The outcome of the race was never really in doubt. Treen’s win four years before had been a fluke, and while he was known to be wonderfully warm and genuinely funny to almost everyone he met personally, Dave Treen, in public, often came across as dull and humorless. The contrast with Edwards could not have been more stark.

Freelance journalist Barry Yeoman recently recalled following Edwards during the 1983 campaign. “What I remember most of that 1983 campaign tour, though, was his story of Horace the peg-legged pig,” Yeoman tweeted. The story begins with a traveler stopping at a farm when, as Edwards told it, ‘”a pig ran out from under the porch, hobbling on a peg leg.”

“The traveler asked the farmer why the pig had a peg leg. The farmer introduced the pig as Horace and said it had saved the family when the house caught fire. But why, asked the traveler, did the pig have a peg leg? The farmer said that Horace once saved his daughter when she had an accident. But why the peg leg? The farmer replied: ‘You don’t eat a good friend like that all at once.'”

“We’ve lost a leg and an arm and an eye and an ear. We’ve been picked to pieces a little bit at a time,” Edwards told a crowd in Ville Platte, according to Yeoman.

There was no need to worry, the former governor declared, “The healer is coming.”

On Oct. 22, 1983, Edwards trounced Treen, winning more than 62% of the vote and becoming the first (and still the only) gubernatorial candidate to garner more than one million votes, a feat he would repeat in 1991. But the campaign had taken a toll on his marriage, and the following year, he and Elaine announced they were divorcing.

During his time away from the Governor’s Mansion, Edwards returned to his law practice. Among others, his clients included billionaire mall developer and Louisiana Downs owner Edward DeBartolo, Sr. He also entered into a business partnership with a pair of entrepreneurs who hoped to turn a profit through the acquisition of nursing home Certificates of Need, which are issued and regulated by the state. There was nothing inherently improper about the business, and not long after he decided to launch his campaign for a third term, Edwards dissolved his interests in the partnership. But U.S. Attorney John Volz thought he could make a case against Edwards for conspiracy and political corruption.

In 1985, Edwards was criminally indicted, though Volz’s theory of the case was convoluted and flimsy. Volz’ basic premise was that Edwards, as a private citizen, should not have entered into an otherwise entirely legal business partnership because, as a former governor who could potentially run for and win back the job of governor, he was a “potential public official.” The argument had no basis in the law. During the first trial, 11 of the 12 members of the jury voted to acquit Edwards on all charges, but a hold-out juror ensured a mistrial. Volz defiantly vowed to retry the governor, and in the second trial, his case unraveled completely. Edwards’ legal team was led by Camille Gravel and Mike Fawer. After the prosecution wrapped up its case, Fawer had been so convinced of Volz’ failure that he pitched a risky but bold move: Instead of presenting their defense, they would rest, immediately sending the case into closing arguments and to the jury. Gravel agreed it was a smart strategy, but Edwards wanted to deliver his closing arguments personally. He asked his lawyers to at least make the request to the judge. It was pure showmanship, a way of amplifying Volz’s humiliation. The request was properly rejected, but either way, it didn’t take long for the jury to vote for acquittal.

Edwards’ political standing, however, took a major hit as a result of the two trials. He was also hampered by a budget crisis. Falling oil prices made Louisiana especially vulnerable. In 1987, for the first time in his career, it appeared Edwards was headed toward defeat. When a young Democratic congressman named Buddy Roemer turned in a first-place primary finish, Edwards saw the writing on the wall. Instead of competing against Roemer in a runoff, Edwards conceded the election. It was a painful decision, but it later proved to be politically savvy, depriving Roemer from the opportunity of claiming a mandate from the majority of the state’s voters. The “Roemer Revolution” was not really a popular revolution, and as Buddy Roemer attempted to steer Louisiana onto a path of economic recovery, Edwin Edwards was plotting his return.

In 1991, Gov. Buddy Roemer, a whip-smart Harvard graduate, made two stupid mistakes that put his chances of a second term at a major disadvantage. First, in February, he announced he was switching his party affiliation and becoming a Republican. There was little strategic sense in the decision. Almost immediately, Roemer lost the support of key Democratic campaign activists and staffers, including press aide Mark McKinnon, who had been critical in building his successful operation four years before. Roemer’s defection would also ensure that this time, Edwin Edwards could claim the Democratic mantle for himself.

Adding insult to injury, the Louisiana Republican Party wasn’t exactly enthusiastic about their newest member.

But perhaps even more damaging, Roemer also decided not to take David Duke seriously. He underestimated the former klansman at his own peril. Duke had been doing his very best to reinvent himself to the public. He had a series of cosmetic procedures. He upgraded his wardrobe. He expressed regret over some of the most incendiary chapters of his early career. He professed to be a born-again Christian. And most importantly, he polished his collection of dog whistles.

It should have been clear to anyone in Louisiana in 1991, especially to the sitting Louisiana governor, that David Duke no longer imagined himself to be a protest candidate. He was building a political movement. When Duke ran for the U.S. Senate in 1990 against Democratic incumbent J. Bennett Johnston, he received the support of nearly 60% of White voters.

On Oct. 19, the night of the jungle primary, Edwin Edwards finished in first place, capturing 523,096 votes, and David Ernest Duke finished in a terrifyingly close second, less than 30,000 votes behind Edwards and nearly 80,000 votes ahead of Roemer.

The Louisiana governor’s race—”the race from hell”— suddenly became the biggest political news story on the planet and a ratings bonanza.

Just as he had been in 1983, when Dean Baquet of the Times-Picayune heard him declare that “the only way I lose this election is if I’m caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy,” the ultimate outcome was never actually in question, but Edwards recognized that anything too close could result in catastrophic reputational damage to the entire state. He also decided to lift a page from the playbook that Buddy Roemer’s campaign never ended up using: He repeatedly emphasized the message that David Duke was bad for business.

In the end, Edwards won comfortably, 61.17% to 38.83%, and for the second time in his career, he captured more than one million votes. His fourth term, which was dominated by the legalization of gambling, would be his last.

In 1994, he married Candy Picou, who was then still in her thirties, and together, they built their “dream home” in an exclusive Baton Rouge neighborhood that surrounds the Country Club of Louisiana. They wanted to have a child together and spoke publicly about how they were consulting with fertility doctors. Edwards once again returned to his private law practice, working out of an office in a building he shared with his son Stephen. But the future that Edwin and Candy Edwards imagined for themselves suddenly became out of reach when a pair of brothers from Houston, Patrick and Michael Graham, struck a secret deal with the FBI after they told a bizarre and fantastical story about the construction of a private juvenile prison in Jena, Louisiana, the relocation of the Minnesota Timberwolves basketball team, and plans to bribe a governor who was no longer in office. “They may be the most accomplished con men in Texas state history,” attorney Kent Schaffer said in 2000. The story the brothers told about Edwards was entirely fabricated, but it was all the justification the government needed when it decided to put Edwards under extensive surveillance in 1996.

The federal government finally succeeded in convicting Edwards in 2000, which will be the subject of an upcoming story in the Bayou Brief, but Edwards spoke emotionally and at length about the investigation and the trial in the speech he delivered at his 90th birthday celebration.

For now, it also should be noted that Edwards survived his time behind bars and thrived for another decade.

“The Chinese have a saying that if you sit by the river long enough,” Edwards told the press on the day he was convicted, “the dead body of your enemy will come floating down the river. I suppose the Feds sat by the river long enough, so here comes my body.” It was an expression he had mentioned numerous times throughout his life, but despite his repeated insistence that he was quoting a Chinese proverb, the first time the exact quotation appeared in print was in James Clavell’s 1975 book Shogun. That it would resonate with Edwards should be no surprise. It is, in some ways, a variation on the story Longfellow told in his poem Evangeline: A Tale of Acadie.

At his 90th, Edwards told guests about the fates of the men who led the prosecution against him. Both Eddie Jordan and Jim Letten ended their careers in public office in disgrace. Jordan, who had become the Orleans Parish District Attorney, was found to have violated federal anti-discrimination laws. Letten’s top two deputies were exposed for authoring troves of anonymous online comments about active cases and ongoing investigations.

“And now I sit on the bank of the river,” Edwards said, “rocking Eli cuddled in my arms and his beautiful mother sings a lullaby. And in my mind’s eye, I watch those who tried to do me hurt float down the river. That’s almost as good as it gets.”

Edwin Washington Edwards is survived by his wife Trina, his daughters Anna and Victoria, his sons Stephen, David, and Eli, and the people of the Great State of Louisiana.

The House That Chep Built

Everybody hates the current New Orleans City Hall. It’s the third and worst of them all but the city outgrew the Cabildo and Gallier Hall so in 1957, a new and “modern” civic center was dedicated. The driving force behind it was then Mayor de Lesseps Story Morrison known to one and all as Chep. Hence the column title: The House That Chep Built.

Chep Morrison is largely forgotten in 21st Century New Orleans but he was a political powerhouse as mayor from 1946-1961. He was the last mayor to be elected by defeating an incumbent. The incumbent was Robert Maestri whose picture is in the dictionary next to political hack. Maestri was a loyal member of the Long machine. Chep Morrison was the scion of a prominent family and a World War II veteran determined to upset the political tea cart in New Orleans.

Maestri was the past, Chep Morrison regarded himself as the future. Unfortunately, his vision did not include the city’s Black population. As a “moderate” segregationist, Morrison wasn’t a hater, but he did little to help Black folks. The advent of the third city hall dispossessed thousands of mostly Black New Orleanians from the 3rd Ward neighborhood that many, including Louis Armstrong, called Back of Town. Team Morrison called it urban renewal and slum clearance; I call it an atrocity. For more details, check out a fine Picvocate article by Richard Campanella.

By the 1990’s there were rumblings about the decrepit state of the House That Chep Built. Its international architectural style no longer looked fresh and modern. It has always reminded me of an office bloc somewhere behind the former Iron Curtain in the former Czechoslovakia or former Soviet Union.

Then there was the question of maintenance. The combination of suburban white flight and the oil bust of the 1980’s depleted city coffers. The last thing a series of mayoral administrations wanted to spend money on was upkeep of The House That Chep Built. It got grottier and grimier over the years because of deferred maintenance.

New Orleans has long specialized in kicking the can down the road. Procrastination is the local style. That’s why a local wag dubbed it The City That Care Forgot, which could be flipped on its head as the city that forgot to care. I have my own nickname for this aspect of my city, TFC: This Fucking City.

The last semi-serious attempt to move city government out of The House That Chep Built came in the waning days of the Nagin administration. I say semi-serious because Mayor C Ray Nagin had become a laughingstock by the end of his second term. Nagin was a big talker who was forever floating exploding economic pies and other half-baked ideas.

In his final state of the city address, Nagin proposed a fourth city hall at the former Chevron Building on Gravier Street downtown. It was a scaled back version of an earlier proposal that included a park, amphitheater, and a casino to pay for the project. He even signed a letter of intent to buy the building, but the city council refused to fund the outgoing mayor’s final pipe dream.

That brings me to the latest proposal to abandon The House That Chep Built. If the third city hall was conceived in racism, hubris, and arrogance, Mayor Cantrell’s proposal to move city government to the Municipal Auditorium has only two of those sins: hubris and arrogance. Given Cantrell’s public wavering on the proposal, it’s unclear how genuine the proposal is or if it’s an election year stunt to pander to donors.

Whatever it is, the proposal is a bad idea. There’s a pot of FEMA money available to renovate the Municipal Auditorium, but $38 million is not enough to fully fund a fourth city hall. Besides, the Municipal Auditorium, is in bad shape having been ignored since Katrina and the federal flood. If you let a building sit empty that long in this climate, it becomes a repository for mold, rodents, and other things I’d rather not contemplate.

Here’s another TFC aspect of the proposal: thanks to procrastination by Mayors Nagin, Landrieu, and Cantrell, the FEMA money will vanish in 2023. The Cantrell proposal smacks of desperation to keep that funding available. I have a suggestion; the money should be used for the purpose it was intended: renovation of a New Orleans landmark that should be saved.  

Then there’s the cultural impact of moving city hall to Treme. Lolis Eric Elie summed it better than I can at The Lens:

Sorely lacking in the mayor’s original proposal was a basic understanding of the significance of the auditorium and the sacred ground on which it sits. Most famously, Congo Square was one of the precious few places that African Americans could gather and maintain their musical, religious and cultural traditions during slavery. Even now, it remains the spiritual center for Black New Orleanians, hosting festivals, music performances and freedom celebrations.

Messing with Congo Square is bad karma, juju or whatever you want to call it; as is the whole fakakta notion of a fourth city hall in Treme. I like Elie’s idea of transforming the auditorium to a cultural center. A lot of history has taken place in that building including many meetings of the Rex-Comus courts, which may have jinxed the building. There’s some bad racist karma/juju associated with those dull gatherings, which could be dispelled by some of the alternative ideas floated by Elie and others.

This grandiose plan is the latest example of how Mayor Cantrell has lost touch with her roots as a neighborhood activist. She came to prominence with her fierce defense of the Broadmoor neighborhood, which some wanted to disappear via the infamous green dot plan floated by developers and other shady characters, including Nagin, after Katrina and the federal flood.

It’s time for Cantrell to listen to the concerns of the Treme neighborhood. That’s what their councilmember, Kristin Gisleson Palmer is doing with a proposal to temporarily halt the mayor’s plan. The council will take up Palmer’s proposal at their next meeting on July 1st.

I’m not a fan of the alternate proposals for a new city hall. It’s time to renovate The House That Chep Built instead of obsessing over a new building. Let’s correct the old mistake instead of making a new one.

One thing The House That Chep Built has going for it is location, location, location. Duncan Plaza is a perfect place for people to demonstrate against government arrogance, hubris, and high-handedness. There’s a lot of that going around when a bit of humility is in order in TFC: This Fucking City.

The last word goes to the Neville Brothers:

Jeff Landry Reports His Campaign Spent Over $120K for Alligator Hunting Tags. There’s Just One Problem.

Before he won his first election, a campaign for Louisiana’s Third Congressional District in 2010, Jeff Landry’s claim to fame was his victory, ten years prior, in the Breaux Bridge Crawfish Festival’s 36th annual Crawfish Eating Competition. Landry, now in his second term as Louisiana attorney general, had a home-field advantage. He grew up right down the street from Breaux Bridge, which, with a population of around 8,100 people, is the largest municipality in South Louisiana’s St. Martin Parish, a veritable metropolis compared to his hometown of St. Martinville.

Landry prevailed by inhaling 20 pounds of mudbugs, which may sound impressive until you discover the all-time winner, Nick Steplocavich, ate 55 pounds and 12 ounces in 1994. The year before Landry claimed the title, the champion was Scott Angelle, future Louisiana Lt. Governor and the son of former Louisiana state Rep. J. Burton Angelle, who defeated former Speaker of the House Bob Angelle, author of a bill officially declaring Breaux Bridge as “crawfish capital of the world.”

Of course, the world can sometimes seem pretty small down in St. Martin Parish.

But this is a story about hunting gators, not boiling crawfish.

100 years ago, at the beginning of the 1920s, when oil and gas companies began dredging canals throughout coastal Louisiana, one of the first victims was the Alligator mississippiensis, the prehistoric predator more commonly known as the American alligator. And because it had suddenly become far easier to see alligators up close and personal, it also became far easier to kill alligators.

People began hunting gators not for food or even for a fancy pair of boots, but for pure sport, and in the process, they very nearly wiped out the entire species.

In 1960, Louisiana finally did what many had been urging for decades: It passed a law that granted the state Department of Wildlife and Fisheries the power to regulate alligator hunting. Four years later, with the state’s alligator population critically low, Louisiana began enforcing a series of severe restrictions on hunting, and three years after that, in 1967, the federal government followed, designating the American alligator as an endangered species.

Within 20 years, as a direct result of dramatic reductions in hunting and a “managed harvest program” Louisiana began implementing in 1979, the alligator population bounced back. For the most part, outside of reality television and only a handful of communities that most Louisianians have never heard of, the recreational gator hunt is largely a thing of the past. The state’s restrictive program turned what had been a sport into an expensive and largely inaccessible “experience.” But it didn’t take long for politicians to figure out how to convert this into campaign cash.

For Jeff Landry’s most generous supporters, that involves traveling to a “camp” about 15 miles southeast of Breaux Bridge, somewhere between Coteau Holmes and Catahoula, not far from the West Atchafalaya Basin Protection Levee and deep in the heart of St. Martin Parish darkness.

Nothing luxurious, but luxury homes don’t last long when they’re built by the water in South Louisiana. It’s a nice spread, though it’s a little ridiculous Landry calls the place his “camp” considering it certainly appears to be his friend’s house.

Louisiana attorney general Jeff Landry’s fishing camp in St. Martin Parish, Louisiana. Source: LandryAlligatorHunt.com. Image by the Bayou Brief.

Landry has been hosting political fundraisers at the “camp” since 2011, the first year of his one and only term in Congress. Perhaps ironically, the event didn’t begin drawing significant attention until 2014. That year, a young congressman from Indiana named Todd Rokita took some heat back home when he turned up at the $5,000-a-head fundraiser in the thick of his own reelection campaign.

“Our little crew brought $30,000 for Jeff Landry from Indiana, because we believe he’s good for the country,” Rokita, who is currently serving as Indiana’s attorney general, boasted to Melinda Deslatte of the Associated Press. He wasn’t the only one of Landry’s former colleagues to make the pilgrimage. Then-House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy showed up as well.

Landry poses with Donald Trump, Jr. and Kimberly Guilfoyle shortly after their arrival at his 2019 gator hunt political fundraiser. Source: Facebook.

The gator hunt quickly earned a spot on Team Trump’s calendar. Don Jr. and his girlfriend Kimberly Guilfoyle turned up in 2019, as did Citizens United chairman and former Trump deputy campaign manager David Bossie and former Florida attorney general Pam Bondi.

Landry is already sending out Save the Date reminders for this year’s gator hunt, the 11th annual, which is set for Sept. 9 through Sept. 11. He’s also soliciting corporate sponsorships.

For $50,000, your business can purchase the naming rights to either the VIP tent or the stage and enjoy a private breakfast with the General himself on Thursday morning.

If you’re interested though, it might be a good idea to ask for receipts.

According to a series of itemized campaign finance reports and documents filed with the Louisiana Secretary of State, since 2014, Jeff Landry has funneled more than $120,000 in campaign donations from his annual gator hunt to a company he owns, Bucks and Ducks Game Management LLC, ostensibly for the purchase of alligator hunting tags.

Hunting tags are not to be confused with alligator hunting licenses, the costs of which are listed separately by Landry’s campaign, which reported spending approximately $21,539 for alligator hunting licenses between 2015 to 2020.

The problem with this accounting, however, is that whereas the state Department of Wildlife and Fisheries charges for alligator hunting licenses ($25 for Louisiana residents and $150 for nonresidents), alligator hunting tags are given out for free.

The tags are also non-transferrable and “property specific.” In other words, the total number of alligators that can be hunted during Louisiana’s 60-day alligator season (there are actually two, the “east zone” season, which opens on the last Wednesday of August, and the “west zone” season, which opens on the first Wednesday of September) depends on the location of the hunt. An enterprising alligator hunting operation cannot simply purchase their neighbors’ unused hunting tags as a way of “balancing their books” in the event that they exceed their own quota. It doesn’t work like that by design.

Notably, through the state’s Lottery Alligator Harvest Program, a select number of Louisiana residents have the opportunity to hunt for alligators on public land, and there is a $40 tag fee in that program. Last year, the LDWF provided “more than 430 licensed resident alligator hunters the opportunity to harvest over 1,290 alligators on about 50 wildlife management areas and public lakes throughout the state.” But for our purposes, none of this matters. Landry’s annual gator hunt does not take place on public land.

An amendment filed in March of 2021 effectively removing three of the original members of Bucks and Ducks Game Management LLC.

At this point, you may be wondering whether it’s possible Landry’s campaign simply miscoded their campaign finance reports, using the term “alligator tags” when they were referring to something else entirely. Remember, these tags are free, so presumably, unless some rogue employee at the LDWF has figured out how to swindle a small fortune from the state attorney general, Landry could not have spent anything on tags.

This may seem somewhat convoluted, but the distinctions are important.

Landry and five others incorporated Bucks and Ducks Game Management in March of 2004. His brother Benjamin, with whom he owns a number of other businesses, was listed as the original registered agent. The arrangement isn’t all too unusual for a group of friends who decide to buy or lease a hunting or fishing camp together. Over the years, the structure of their arrangement changed. Jeff replaced his brother as the agent, and earlier this year, they removed three of their original members.

So what does this all mean, and is there an innocent explanation as to why the Landry campaign (and also their affiliated PAC, it’s worth mentioning) has shelled out so much money for free alligator tags? Are they simply paying themselves and attempting to cover their tracks by listing “phantom” expenses?

Landry, no doubt, will claim that these costs aren’t literally for alligator hunting tags; rather, they are to compensate the property owners who allow access to the group from Landry’s annual gator hunt. Property owners can’t sell the tags—remember, they’re non-transferrable, attached to the land itself, and managed by the state—but they can enter into contracts with licensed hunters who want to use their land during alligator season. However, this is the kind of detail you’re supposed to pass along to the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries. And if Landry is, in fact, paying land owners, that’s also the kind of detail he’s supposed to disclose in his campaign finance reports.

For a number of good reasons, the state of Louisiana, as a matter of general policy, doesn’t want to encourage roving parties of amateur gator hunting tourists. It’s actually not all that easy for just anyone to kill an alligator, legally at least. First, you’ll need a license, and if you’re born after 1969, you’ll also need to complete a training course. If you’re just here for the weekend and you don’t have time to complete the course, then you need to be under the “direct supervision” of a licensed hunter who has gone through the training or a licensed hunter who was born before 1969.

All of this can create a logistical nightmare for someone like Jeff Landry, who doesn’t own a huge expanse of land but would like to invite a bunch of paid guests to Louisiana to thrill kill a pile of gators. It’s easy to imagine how one would attempt to get around these constraints by simply purchasing a bunch of contraband alligator hunting tags, either not knowing or not caring about how doing so makes a mockery of the state’s alligator harvest and conservation programs.

To put all of this into context, consider the meticulous details with which Landry and his PACs (with seemingly zero regard for the prohibition against coordination) have inventoried practically every other expense related to the gator hunt, including things like the purchase of $27.36 worth of twine. Here are all of the expenses related to the gator hunt from 2014-2020. They total $463,359.

It’s more than a little curious that more than 25% of these expenses—26.7% to be precise— are for something impossible to purchase.

When Jeff Landry arrived in Washington D.C. a decade ago, he carried with him between $80,000 to $200,000 in student loan and credit card debt, according to financial disclosure documents filed with the Clerk of the House. The year before he took office, he reported an “earned income” of only $12,000.

Source: Clerk of the United States House of Representatives

We also know that throughout the past decade his campaign has paid him, either through his “staffing” company UST Environmental Services (which presumably stands for “underground storage tank”) or directly, a considerable amount of money. (Believe it or not, a candidate may draw a salary from his campaign, though Landry has never explicitly claimed to be doing so).

During his first year in office, which also happened to be the first year of the gator hunt, his campaign reimbursed him for a number of expenses, all seemingly permissible and otherwise unremarkable. But it also issued the following disbursement:

Source: Federal Election Commission

Incidentally, that year, it didn’t report spending a dime on alligator hunting tags.

The Valarie Hodges Show

Not long after Louisiana state Rep. Valarie Hodges joined the legislature in 2012, she began tweeting from a new account, presumably in an effort to distinguish between statements issued in her official capacity and those made on her personal Twitter account, @ValarieHHodges, which she’d set up in March of 2009.

There was just one problem.

Her name was misspelled. She’s Valarie, two a’s and one e. The account used the more common spelling of Valerie, with one a and two e’s. In fact, according to the website Playlist.fm, she’s the sixth most famous “Valarie” on the planet.

More than likely, her new “official” account had been created by a well-intentioned staffer, who, like practically everyone else, including then-U.S. Sen. David Vitter, assumed she spelled her name the way most people spell it.

Nearly 10 years later, this tweet still had zero likes and, until I shared it, zero retweets as well.

Almost as soon as the new account appeared online, it vanished completely. Over time, it would become clear that the idea of Hodges being diligent and professional with her use of social media was, let’s just say, optimistically naive.

Aside from the spelling of her name, there are two things about Valarie Hodges that help to explain her approach to politics: First, she is a religious extremist.

Among other things, in 2019, she opposed a new law that established 16 as the minimum age in which a person can get married, requiring 16 and 17-year-olds to obtain both judicial and parental permission before getting married and prohibiting marriages between those ages 16 and 17 to anyone more than three years older.

“It is the parent’s decision when a child is mature enough to take a husband or wife,” Hodges argued on her website.

The second thing to know is that Hodges lives in Watson, Louisiana, an unincorporated part of Livingston Parish located about six miles north of Denham Springs and 19 miles northeast of Baton Rouge. According to the most recent population estimate from the American Community Survey, Watson is home to approximately 1,252 people, 100% of whom are White, an astonishing statistic for any community in a state in which 32.22% of the population is Black.

Her timelines on Facebook and Twitter, which she stopped using after the platform banned former president Donald Trump in the immediate aftermath of the deadly insurrection he incited at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, are—pardon the pun—a hodgepodge of fake news stories and bizarre conspiracy theories.

Hodges has a particular affinity for The Epoch Times, a far-right outlet affiliated with the Falun Gong religious movement and one known for its aggressive promotion of a constellation of conspiracies popularized by followers of QAnon.

Until recently, Hodges had been primarily known for retracting support for former Gov. Bobby Jindal’s school voucher program—which had been touted as the most expansive of its kind in the nation—after discovering that it could potentially provide taxpayer support for “Muslim schools.” She had “mistakenly assumed that ‘religious’ meant ‘Christian,'” the Livingston Parish News reported at the time.

“I actually support funding for teaching the fundamentals of America’s Founding Fathers’ religion, which is Christianity, in public schools or private schools,” Hodges said. “Unfortunately it will not be limited to the Founders’ religion.”

Of course, not only were the nation’s founders not exclusively Christian, our history is replete with statements from America’s most prominent early leaders—people like George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison—expressly rejecting any notion that the United States was founded as a Christian nation.

Valarie Hodges

“We need to insure [sic] that it does not open the door to fund radical Islam schools. There are a thousand Muslim schools that have sprung up recently,” Hodges claimed, falsely, while attempting to explain her reversal on school vouchers. “I do not support using public funds for teaching Islam anywhere here in Louisiana.”

Two weeks ago, Hodges again attracted national attention, this time for claiming that her physician told her that a pulmonologist she knows was instructing people not to get vaccinated for covid-19 because they could become “very very sick and possibly die from it.”

But while Hodges’ dubious assertions about medical science are reckless, dangerous, and certainly worthy of public opprobrium, she’s spent the bulk of the current legislative session ignoring covid-19 and championing a pair of education curricula bills. Both proposals, HB 352 and HB 416, require greater scrutiny, not only because of who appears to be behind their drafting but also because of the way in which both are designed to circumvent the standard process for implementing changes to public school curricula.

At first glance, neither of the two bills seem to be cause for much controversy: HB 416 is ostensibly about improving educational instruction on the Holocaust and World War II, and HB 352 presents itself as a way of ensuring public school students are taught about the nation’s founding documents, namely the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Federalist Papers.

In making the case for the latter, Hodges has emphasized this aspect most frequently, citing a handful of highly questionable and unidentified “surveys,” including one she claims that found only one out 1,000 Americans can correctly name one of the first 10 amendments in the Bill of Rights, as evidence of the legislation’s necessity.

However, on her Facebook account, Hodges has offered a different justification. “STOP the cancel culture from changing America’s founding history!” she implores her followers. “STAND your ground, or lose it! Please share!”

That’s because, in addition to mentioning the nation’s “founding documents,” Hodges’ bill also includes references to the nation’s “founding principles,” which, according to her, include “American exceptionalism” and “traditional standards of moral values.”

Her bill about Holocaust and WWII education may seem far less objectionable, until one considers the fact that it appears to have been drafted on behalf of Christians United for Israel, an organization founded by right-wing extremist and Christian televangelist John Hagee.

Former Vice President Mike Pence (left) and Texas televangelist John Hagee (right) at the Christians United for Israel summit in July 2019.

“In CUFI’s philosophy, war and violence are celebrated as harbingers of the end times. That’s extremely frightening to me. It should be extremely frightening to all of us. This kind of religious extremism empowered by those with the ability to make U.S. foreign policy is alarming,” Rabbi Alissa Wise, the co-executive director of Jewish Voice for Peace, told the San Antonio Current in 2019. “[Hagee’s] philosophy isn’t about love for the Jewish people but a theology that requires Jewish settlement on that land for the end times to come. Both Jews and Muslims are reduced to end-time pawns in CUFI’s philosophy.” 

Given Hodges’ publicly-professed antipathy toward Muslims and the Islamic faith, it’s more than appropriate to call into question her role in sponsoring and promoting legislation drafted on behalf of a televangelist’s political organization. Moreover, considering her strident opposition to amendments offered by her Black colleagues, amendments that sought to ensure the inclusion of Black history as a part of the curricula, it’s difficult not to be left with the impression that her intention has nothing to do with improving education and is instead purely an exercise in political power-grabbing.

When the bills were first introduced to members of the House Education Committee, Hodges used the occasion to share an outlandish story about the 22 years (on her website, she claims it was 18 years) she spent living as a Christian missionary in Mexico.

“We lived in the harshest of conditions,” she begins while describing her experience as an evangelical missionary inside of a country in which Christians comprise 90.7% of the population. “We lived in mud huts. I bathed my children in rivers.”

The pulp fiction thriller she told—one in which she is the continual victim of a parade of horribles and, at the same time, the selfless Christian servant willing to humble herself by learning fragments of Spanish—was both delusional and deeply offensive. But it requires a special kind of hubris to move to a country with a history of conquest and conquistadors with the intention of converting the natives to the religion of White American exceptionalism.

Notably, as she would later reveal, she actually lived in Guadalajara, Mexico’s third-largest metropolis and one of the ten biggest cities in Latin America.

This is Guadalajara:

Guadalajara, Mexico. Image credit: Shutterstock

Hodges used the story of her time as a missionary in Mexico in a clumsy attempt at neutralizing criticisms from her Black colleagues (she too knows what it’s like to be “marginalized,” she said, because people called her a “gringo“) and as a way of introducing the concept of American exceptionalism.

Joshua Benton, the founder of the Neiman Journalism Lab at Harvard University and a self-described “proud Cajun,” uncovered an old blog post by Hodges in which she cites three “fake” quotes, one misattributed quote, and another out-of-context quote in an attempt to prove that the United States was founded as a Christian nation:

The fifth quote is erroneously attributed to John Adams and not its actual author, John Jay.

Hodges’ warped understanding of American history is hardly unusual among those in the fringes of the religious right. It lends a phony provenance to a political movement, one that cloaks itself in the language of faith and hopes to exploit the instrumentalities of the state in order to accumulate power and gain control.

For Christian dominionists like Hodges, the ability to determine public education curricula has always remained a top priority.

A 2005 editorial in the Journal of Church and State by Derek H. Davis and Matthew McMearty, “America’s ‘Forsaken Roots’: The Use and Abuse of Founders’ Quotations,” sheds significant light on the real source of Hodges’ phony quotes, and it’s a name that will likely be familiar to anyone in Texas who has worked in public education policymaking or those in Louisiana who have followed the current legislative session.

When Hodges told members of the House Education Committee her outlandish story about life in Guadalajara, Mexico, she was flanked by David and Tim Barton, the father/son duo behind WallBuilders, which describes itself as “an organization dedicated to presenting America’s forgotten history and heroes, with an emphasis on the moral, religious, and constitutional foundation on which America was built – a foundation which, in recent years, has been seriously attacked and undermined.”

David is the one with the silver hair.

For more than 15 years, the Bartons—primarily Barton the elder— have peddled a distorted and demonstrably fraudulent version of American history to education officials in Texas, as Dr. Mark Chancey of Southern Methodist University’s Perkins School of Theology first detailed in 2006. In their retelling, America is a nation exclusively comprised of heroes—no villains allowed— and a land ordained by a very peculiar and very Protestant iteration of a Judeo-Christian God.

On Monday, when Hodges’ HB 416, the bill pertaining to Holocaust and WWII education, came up for debate on the floor of the state House, a remarkable moment occurred when one of her Black colleagues, state Rep. Royce Duplessis, a Democrat from New Orleans, rose to question her repeated objections to amendments from Black lawmakers who sought to include language about the contributions of African Americans.

I asked Duplessis to elaborate on his objections to Hodges’ bill. “BESE [the Louisiana Board of Elementary and Secondary Education] already has a process in place that assesses social studies curriculum every seven years and then makes recommendations on what should be taught,” he told me. “This is a comprehensive process that involves experts as well as public input. I support teaching about the Holocaust and all matters important to U.S. and world history, but I don’t think the legislature should be cherry-picking certain subjects and then mandating they be taught without having at least gone through a process involving all stakeholders.”

It’s undeniably true that Hodges seeks to circumvent the ordinary process and usurp the powers provided to BESE under the state Constitution, which seems especially ironic considering the legislation’s purported respect for civics education. (On multiple occasions, Hodges and at least one of her Republican colleagues, state Rep. Beryl Amedee, falsely claimed that BESE derived its authority from the legislature, when it actually was established constitutionally).

But unfortunately, there’s very little reason to believe Hodges and her Republican enablers care much at all for a transparent “process involving all stakeholders.”

After state Rep. Ted James, a Democrat from Baton Rouge and the Chair of the Black Caucus, introduced an amendment about Black history to Hodges’ HB 416, Republican lawmakers asked whether he would kindly consider introducing the amendment to Hodges’ other bill, HB 352. He smartly refused, noting that Hodges had done very little to demonstrate her receptiveness toward any amendments to either bill.

Three days later, when HB 352 came up for a floor vote, Republican state Rep. Lance Harris moved quickly to prevent the introduction of any amendments.

James’ amendment failed, and both HB 352 and HB 416 passed easily (though neither garnered the votes necessary to withstand a veto).

I wondered what state Rep. James made of the repeated disrespect demonstrated toward Black lawmakers and the flippant disregard exhibited toward Black history.

“I didn’t expect much from a group that has no idea about the Middle Passage,” he said.

Gov. Buddy Roemer: Prologue | Scopena

Publisher’s Note:

Charles Elson “Buddy” Roemer III, the 52nd Governor of Louisiana, former four-term U.S. Representative from Louisiana’s Fourth Congressional District, and 2012 candidate for President of the United States, passed away on May 17, 2021 at the age of 77.

The following excerpt from his memoir Scopena: A Memoir of Home was originally published in the Bayou Brief with permission of the author on Dec. 14, 2017.

PROLOGUE

I am seventy-four, and I had a stroke July 2014. The stroke affected my fine motor skills and weakened my right side, but with physical therapy I’ve managed to regain my physical abilities enough to return to work in an investment bank that my son, Chas, started seven years ago. And although the stroke causes me to slur my words occasionally, the biggest enemy to my good health is diabetic-neuropathy.

Neuropathy is an affliction of your nerves causing you to lose feelings in your legs and other nervous connections. It is the result of Type 1 diabetes—in my case, a disease that I’ve had since I was twenty-nine. As a result of my neuropathy, I walk with a cane.

My stroke occurred when, as my wife Scarlett and I were leaving Sunday School one July morning, I slurred three words in talking about going to eat lunch.

Scarlett, a registered nurse, and I decided to go quickly to India’s Restaurant to eat and avoid the onset of a diabetic attack (due to low blood sugar). We didn’t have the testing meter for blood sugar with us, and Scarlett thought that if we ate I would be alright. So we did, and things were fine at the restaurant, but while we stopped at a gas station on the way home, I slurred several words, and Scarlett decided to rush me straight to the emergency room at the local hospital.

She called ahead, and they were ready for me. I was former governor of Louisiana and was well-known by most people, so I waved at a couple of folks on my way into the hospital. As a nurse, Scarlett was trained to let the doctors know what was happening with me.

I was feeling no pain but I noticed that my face was drooping and that the hand motions that they wanted me to do were not going well. I couldn’t touch the end of my nose with my right finger-tips, for example. They decided to do an MRI and, as they suspected, discovered I had suffered a stroke that affected me in my small motor skills and right side of my body. They kept me for several days, and finally released me to go home with a cane, recommending physical therapy on a daily basis.

About nine months after the stroke, I was struck with the on-set of neuropathy, a nerve disorder common to many people as they age, but particularly pronounced among people with Type 1 diabetes. People with neuropathy lose feelings particularly in their feet, but all nerves are affected. As a result, people affected often walk haltingly—like a person older than their age. While my speaking and walking had improved in strength for a year after the stroke, my neuropathy has decreased my walking abilities to about 50 percent of my former self.

So I have had a challenging two years with a stroke and operations on my right and left carotid arteries as a result, surgery on my prostate unrelated to the stroke, two cataract surgeries, and neuropathy. I have survived, and I have started thinking about my childhood and growing up on a cotton farm in north Louisiana—Scopena. My parents had both died recently, so I started remembering my childhood, how different it was from most people’s, how I was the oldest child and the natural one to tell about the events at Scopena, and how it might be of interest to new family members.

For years I have resisted writing about my growing up on Scopena in south Bossier Parish in the far northwest corner of Louisiana. I’m not a writer. Never wrote a book in my life. But Dad died on July 7, 2012, after a twelve-year bout with Alzheimer’s at the age of eighty-nine, and Mom died at ninety-two in bed at home in February 2016, and, in effect, I was free for the first time to write my own personal account of the events on Scopena in the 1950s, when I was growing up. Plus I felt a need to tell about events of which only I knew.

Despite my stroke, I count myself lucky not to be handicapped in my thinking and writing skills. I wish I could speak better—clearer and stronger and in my old rhythm, but it is a miracle that I speak at all. In the past my ability to speak well has always played a role in my success. Now, the premium is on listening. Dad always told me it would be that way—“Listen, Butch. Listen,” he would say, when I hadn’t paid attention to some important instruction. He was right, as usual.

So, unable to be as physically active as before, and with more time on my hands, my thoughts began to turn to writing about my Dad, my Mom, and our life at Scopena. It’s something that others have asked me to do over the years. Why have I resisted? Writing seemed something that somebody else did. Besides, to write about one’s father and mother is something that I hesitated to do. The damage to the perceptions of the living is always a danger. People might have different memories of events or they might have been told a skewed version of the truth that they have come to believe. Plus, it seemed almost arrogant to me for a man to write about himself, although when friends would write a book of memories or of some event, I would read it with pleasure. It was not something that I would do myself, I thought. But I was wrong, and worked for more than two years on this memoir of my early life and growing up on Scopena.

Dad and Mom were wonderful parents: careful, loving, protective, so I don’t write to expose a flaw I found in them. Any flaw is in me. What can I add to their legacy? Mom was a wonderful mother of five, smart as a whip, and beautiful as a spring morning. Dad was a leader in everything he did: Bossier Rural Electrification Cooperation, Bossier Farm Bureau, Louisiana Generation and Power Cooperation, National Democratic Party, and Louisiana State Commissioner of Administration, not to mention the father of five children who spent countless hours with each child when they needed it most.

Any flaw or fault that someone finds in these pages is a result of my experience. These are my perceptions and no one else’s.

So too, it’s hard for a son as close to his father as I was, to write about his father—particularly a father who is well-known in political circles, but not well understood; a father who never ran for political office himself, yet raised a son who ran eleven times and won seven, including races for congressman and governor, and lost for president. Dad never ran for political office so he never had to disclose his inner-self or his private records. He could appear to be one thing, but in reality he was something completely different.

He appeared to be in command of whatever situation he was thrust in, but that wasn’t always the case. He was good at appearing in control, but, in truth, he was often ill at ease and asked for guidance from my mother, and from his own mother. The things that confused him at times, that made him seek guidance from someone he trusted, were “people” problems. The people problems weren’t a phobia for him. He wasn’t a head case. He just wasn’t as comfortable with people as he was with the “problems” they caused. He wasn’t a glad-hander, a slap-on-the-back kind of guy. He was quiet, and many considered him a “loner.” He wasn’t a mixer, to put it in a collegiate or political way. He was an “intimidator” in his approach to people. His tone; his attitude; his bluster were all designed to keep people away; to keep people ill at ease; to intimidate them. He would take the position that it had to be done his way or nothing would get done.

“People” problems were something that Dad at times needed help with. His mother, “Mine,” often would advise him about reaching out to people to solve a problem, but Mom was the real champion in quietly talking him into seeing the other person’s point of view. Many a time on the farm I can remember waiting for Dad to listen to Mine or Mom to decide how to implement a strategy that affected people. He was so sure on hedging or planting strategies, yet so uncertain in trusting a foreman to supervise an operation out of his sight.

This flaw was to bedevil him when he found himself, years later, in the turmoil of Louisiana politics—a politics that were “people,” not “performance,” oriented. He didn’t suffer fools well, and he had no patience with people. This was a thicket that Dad wanted to tame—he wanted the challenge—but he tried to do it by himself and without the help he needed from Scopena, including Mom or Mine. In fact, he left Scopena behind for this new challenge. It was a mistake, because he wasn’t prepared to handle the world by himself.

* * *

It has been relatively easy for me to avoid writing about when I was governor. A professional writer called me up after my term ended and made the case for me to write a book under his tutelage that would set the record straight on what I had done and why. I could care less what people think, although there is a story or two to tell about how we had pulled Louisiana back from the brink of bankruptcy and put the state’s finances on a stable path; how we had battled the teacher unions over my efforts to bring greater accountability to Louisiana’s schools; how we had attempted to create a single board to oversee the state’s colleges and universities to bring coherence and coordination to their budgets and planning; how we had gone to the mat with state legislators over my view that they had passed unconstitutional acts to restrict the right of women to abortion; how we had passed the first tough campaign finance disclosure bill in Louisiana history; how we had been the first administration to insist on tough standards to protect Louisiana’s air and water. The writer thought these issues would be most interesting if written from my point of view. Boring, it seemed to me. Too self-serving, I thought.

My problem as governor, looking back after twenty-five years, was often just the opposite of my father’s. He wouldn’t waste (his word, “waste”) any time with people working out a problem. Just do it his way, and everything would be fine. I wanted to hear opinions opposite mine from the people who were most involved. Maybe that’s what made me a “politician,” unlike Dad, who never was described as “political” in any of his dealings with people.

* * *

One thing that I took the lead from Dad on was the suspicion of money and politics. Dad always had a deeply felt belief that Washington, D.C., was too heavily influenced by people with money. He thought that money interests controlled Washington and kept it from representing Americans in general and the average man in particular.

When I ran for president in 2012, I expressed my concern about political action committee (PAC) money and influence-peddling in the presidential campaign of that year. That is what Dad believed, and that is what he taught me. He just couldn’t turn a political phrase with it. He couldn’t run a political campaign with it, because for a man deeply mired in politics—eight years as commissioner of administration of Louisiana—and never elected to a political office, he was the most anti-political animal on the planet. In fact, “politics” was a thing of derision to him. It was a game that he didn’t take seriously.

From Dad I got my cynicism of politics. From Mom, I got my idealism. Both can be valuable traits to have. Mom’s political idealism shone in 1978 when I lost my first race for Congress by two thousand votes in the midst of 100,000 cast ballots because I said a local project was a “boondoggle” with a couple weeks before the election; saying that we should balance the budget before building a “boondoogle.” After dropping to fifth place in a sixteen person field, I struggled to finish a close third in a losing election. Mom said she was proud of me for taking a stand, and the people would come to understand. (I won the next election for Congress two years later in 1980.) Dad said I ought to learn to keep my mouth shut during the two weeks before the election, although I could tell he was proud of me too.

In 2012, a New York publishing company tried to interest me in writing a book about my campaign for president that year under my signature issues: limiting contributions to no more than $100 per individual, not taking PAC or super PAC money, and reporting every penny contributed to the campaign. Let’s shine a light on money in politics, I thought. People now are clueless on where political money comes from and the influence over the politician and the politics that comes with it.

My ideas didn’t get much of a hearing, however. I got a good reception when I appeared on cable TV shows like Morning Joe, but the Republican Party established rules that shut me out of the debates. They set a minimum percentage in the latest poll for a candidate to qualify for the debate. I never qualified. I was always a point too low. If four percentage points were needed to qualify in South Carolina, I had three. If five were needed in New Hampshire, I had four. The highest I got was Florida at nine percentage points. They set the bar for entry at 10 percent, of course.

It was very difficult to gain in the polls if you didn’t participate in the debates because that was the way that you gained name recognition with the masses. And if you didn’t gain name recognition with the masses, you didn’t climb in the polls and earn a right to be in in the next debate. As Dad would have expected, since I had no money of my own, I ended my campaign for president after getting only a handful of votes in New Hampshire. Donald Trump four years later was to prove the power of my campaign stance. He didn’t know anything about politics except one important fact: money controls everything in Washington, D.C. I just couldn’t get the publicity he could, and he had wealth of his own and cut right to the chase: he didn’t care what the insiders felt, because they were the problem.

The idea of writing a book about running for president was a good one, but I was too frustrated with the result of the campaign. I was fed up with the sham the general election campaign had turned out to be. It was too painful, too recent for me to want to do it, given the difficulties of the effort. What seems so obvious to me—important elections are too often bought by the special interests—wasn’t so obvious to everyone else, or, if it was obvious, they didn’t want to acknowledge it. I was too close to the race, and too upset to write unemotionally about my race for president.

* * *

My thinking has changed about a book about my childhood and my Mom and Dad now that they are gone, and now that I’m over seventy and realize that I probably won’t be so lucky on my next stroke. I warmed to an idea I had been thinking about for a long time: writing an account of what it was like to grow up on Scopena—our farm where I lived as a boy from 1950 until 1960, when I went away to college at age sixteen—and what lessons my Dad taught me about family, hard work, race, and life; and Mom, about love and people. Dad was a wonderful father. He raised me to be independent in all my interactions with people and with groups. And Mom—she was the best.

From the very beginning, I was an unusual politician, an independent-minded congressman in a highly charged partisan atmosphere who refused to take PAC money. Because of my independence, I stood out from other Democratic congressmen in joining Republicans to work for what I thought was the good of the country. For example, I joined some forty members of Congress—all Democrats and out of 535 house members—to form the “boll weevils” caucus to support the initiatives of President Reagan, a Republican. But no colleagues joined with me to prevent the purchase of Congress by PACs by not taking their money. Many were good, decent members of Congress, but they were compromised by taking the PAC money. I see it now; I didn’t see it then.

I decided it would be important for me to go back to my roots at Scopena and try to gain an understanding of why my views were so different than those of the typical politician. Was it an accident of time and place, or did it have to do with my upbringing?

I grew up during a time when “family” meant security and sharing more than it does now. There are many examples of lessons learned that can still be relevant in twenty-first-century America, but they are seldom taught these days. My Mom and Dad were extraordinarily devoted parents who had unusual ideas about childrearing that led them to raise five gifted children. This book is about my mother and father, mostly my father, because of the tragedy that befell him when he dared stick his head into Louisiana politics. But most of all, it is about the farm that we grew up on in the 1950s. It is about Scopena.

In those ten years that I lived at Scopena, I formed my views of the world based on the value of individuals rather than on the color of someone’s skin, and I learned the keys of success that I carried into the world far from there, keys like hard work, team effort, honesty in reporting what you saw. The truth is that the highest hurdle I had to jump in life and the thing that prepared me the most for politics, Louisiana-style, were the demanding standards set by my father years ago—at Scopena.

Scopena is a place. You can see it from Highway 71 South, and see its cotton gin, tennis courts, swimming pool, shop, its big front yard, and its tall pecan trees. But the heart of Scopena—the life of Scopena, the magic of Scopena, the uniqueness of Scopena—was Mom and Dad, raising five kids under a philosophy that ignored what the rest of the world thought and that emphasized individual effort. With Dad and Mom gone, I want to tell the story of Scopena before it too is gone or unrecognizable.

Race relations in the 1950s were relatively progressive at Scopena, unlike what was happening in the rest of the South. This is not to say that black people had no problems at Scopena, many of their rights as people were not protected, but Mom and Dad ensured that on Scopena they counted as much as white families—in pay, in housing, in opportunity for advancement, even in voting. Regardless, to be black, even on Scopena, was to be a second-class citizen.

* * *

In the 1950s, when the bulk of this tale takes place, Scopena was a big, and getting bigger, farm, far away from the city and what was happening in Louisiana and in the nation. It was far from Louisiana politics. It was a scene of political discussions to be sure, but it was the type of place to which politicians came to seek support and money, not a place that grew politicians. For a long time when I was growing up, Scopena meant farming, not politics. For me, Scopena was the most important place in the world, but to most people in the city, it was where we country-people lived.

We were twelve miles from Bossier City. Dad was the boss man. And there was nothing to challenge his dominance. He didn’t have to put up with backtalk from anyone, because we lived in a special world, in which he was in charge.

Scopena: A Memoir of Home is available for purchase from Octavia Books in New Orleans and in print and digital versions on Amazon.

Does A Proposed Change to Louisiana’s State Motto Honor the Union, Promote Justice, and Inspire Confidence?

On Thursday, without any substantive discussion and by a vote of 10-2, members of the Louisiana House Judiciary Committee approved sending one of the quirkiest bills of the current legislative session, state Rep. Richard Nelson’s HB 17, to the House floor for a full vote. Nelson’s bill would change Louisiana’s state motto to “We live and die for those we love,” an expression that may seem like a lyric from a country music song to those unfamiliar with 19th century Louisiana history.

“It’s another non-controversial Nelson bill, guys,” the freshman legislator joked after being introduced by the committee chair, state Rep. Randall Gaines.

Nelson, a libertarian-leaning Republican from Mandeville who the Times-Picayune lauded for bringing “a world of experience” after being elected in 2019 “despite [his] youth” (he turns 35 later this month), has also earned praise from something exceedingly rare in the highly polarized legislature, a bipartisan coalition of Democrats and a block of younger, more moderate Republicans, for introducing legislation that would end life sentences for juvenile offenders and a bill that seeks to legalize recreational marijuana, an effort that already made history simply by making it out of committee (the vote was 7-5).

A staggering 67% of Louisiana residents support the decriminalization of marijuana, according to a recent scientific poll by John Couvillon of JMC Analytics and Polling, up from 54% just last year. Nelson cites studies estimating a potential revenue boost of as much as $200 million a year. According to the Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, 1,362 people are currently incarcerated on marijuana offenses (the department notes that “some” are also incarcerated on other “charge(s)”). “A reduction in convictions could save Corrections $67.36 per day per offender and $24,586 annually ($67.36 per day per offender x 365 days) for those in a state facility,” writes Alan Boxberger, staff director of the Louisiana Legislative Auditor’s office, in the fiscal note attached to Nelson’s bill. (For those wondering, 1,362 x $24,586 equals $33,486,132).

I mention this as a way of explaining, as a disclaimer, why I am personally persuaded when Nelson tells me that he specifically tasked his office with researching his proposed motto “We live and die for those we love” to ensure it was not, in any way, connected to the state’s shameful Confederate past. “I have no interest in fighting any kind of cultural battle over a motto that most citizens don’t even know exists,” he told me in an email.

Louisiana’s current motto, “Union, Justice, Confidence,” Nelson points out, was never specifically adopted as the state’s motto in statute, though this may be a distinction without much of a difference considering the motto does appear in the statute that defines Louisiana’s state flag.

The two nays were somewhat of an odd couple, Republican Mike Johnson of Pineville (not to be confused with the Republican congressman of the same name from Bossier City, and New Orleans Democrat Mandie Landry, who has emerged as a leading voice of the progressive left after joining the legislature last year. “I like ‘Union, Justice, Confidence’ just fine,” Landry told me, “and I didn’t like the new suggested quote. I don’t see the need for it either.”

I should make it clear that, for the reasons I outline below, I’m reluctant to make a definitive conclusion about the historicity of this specific expression or the motivation behind the use of a similar motto immediately following the adoption of the Articles of Secession and its popularization in post-Reconstruction Louisiana. That said, the proposed change clearly merits more scrutiny, particularly considering the lack of discussion during the bill’s hearing in front of the House Judiciary Committee. As our neighbors in Texas recently learned after state Rep. Briscoe Cain snuck in the expression “purity of the ballot box” in a new voter suppression bill, citing its use in the Texas state Constitution, sometimes, a simple and seemingly innocuous phrase is actually a euphemistic relic of a racist past.

****

Lousiana Gov. William C.C. Claiborne. Image source: Louisiana Digital Library. Image credit: Lamar White, Jr., Bayou Brief.

In 1813, less than a year after the Territory of Orleans became the State of Louisiana, its 37-year-old governor William Charles Cole Claiborne—a Jeffersonian Republican who continues to hold the distinction of being the youngest person ever elected to the U.S. House of Representatives (at the age of only 22) and who would later be known as the great-great-great-grandfather of Liz Claiborne, the American fashion designer, and the third-great-granduncle of both Rep. Lindy Boggs of Louisiana and Sen. Claiborne Pell of Rhode Island— began using his “private seal,” which depicted a mother pelican feeding her young, on official state documents.

At least one early iteration of the state seal featured the motto, “Justice, Union, Confidence,” alongside 18 stars, representing the number of states that belonged to the new nation.

According to the enabling legislation ratifying Louisiana statehood, Claiborne’s seal, likely for the sake of expediency, would be considered the imprimatur of government authority, in the event that the fledgling new state didn’t get around to adopting something else instead.

Claiborne’s mother pelican made sense for a number of reasons.

Brown Pelicans—the big-mouthed, loquacious, prehistoric creatures who have inhabited the planet for eons—thrived in abundance along the Gulf Coast, and their more attractive cousins, the majestic American White Pelicans, flew down every winter. The Brown Pelican may be the state bird, but it’s their vacationing relative who graces the state flag.

Louisiana state flag, updated in 2006. Courtesy of the Louisiana Secretary of State.

And, of course, because these birds were ancient, they were already a part of mythology and symbology, one that traces back to seventh-century Christendom.

Pelicans were often featured in compendiums known as bestiaries, “illuminated manuscripts featuring stories of real and imagined animals tied to Christian allegories,” explains Anastasia Pineschi in “The Pelican, Self-Sacrificing Mother Bird of the Medieval Bestiary,” a 2018 post for the Getty Museum’s Iris Blog as part of an undergraduate seminar taught by Meredith Cohen, a professor of Art History at UCLA.


Plate with Pelican in Her Piety
, 1400s, unknown artist, made in Dinant or Malines, Netherlands. Brass, 19 7/8 in. diam. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 64.101.1498. Gift of Irwin Untermyer, 1964. www.metmuseum.org

For the medieval monk Isidore of Seville, reverence was reserved for a particular kind of pelican indigenous to the Nile River Valley in Egypt: Those known to prey on and devour crocodiles and lizards. “The crocodiles and lizards that the pelican allegedly eats were read as symbols of the devil, because of the serpentine form the devil takes in the Book of Genesis to tempt Eve in the garden of Eden,” Pineschi writes. “By devouring these demons, the righteous pelican helped purify the world of sin.”

The notion of the “pelican in her piety” refers to the maternal act of self-sacrifice in which the mother punctures herself and nourishes her chicks with her own blood. “The standard pelican story begins with the mother pelican giving birth to a brood of young chicks,” explains Pineschi. “As the young grow, they become violent toward the parent that has selflessly cared for them, attempting to peck out her eyes and mutilate her. In anger she retaliates, striking her young dead, but after three days regrets her actions and pierces her own side with her beak. As she allows her blood to drip on the young, they revive and she dies, having made the ultimate sacrifice for her children.”

A Pelican Feeding Her Young (detail) in a bestiary, 1278–1300, unknown illuminator, Franco-Flemish. Tempera colors, pen and ink, gold leaf, and gold paint on parchment, 9 3/16 × 6 7/16 in. The J. Paul Getty Museum, Ms. Ludwig XV 4, fol. 21v. Digital image courtesy of Getty’s Open Content Program.

Bill Claiborne, a Virginia native who arrived in Louisiana by way of New York, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Mississippi, didn’t make a secret of his fascination with pelicans, and so his decision to use the pelican in her piety as his “private seal” and thus the seal of the state he governed hardly seems surprising. It had the added benefit of appealing to the state’s substantial Catholic population, who were already acquainted with the iconography, and, more specifically, with its French Catholics, who saw in the mother pelican their motherland. (It’s worth mentioning that in earlier versions of Claiborne’s seal, the pelican looked like an eagle).

“It is also important to remember that in 1793, during the time of Louisiana’s Spanish colonial status, when the Catholic Diocese of Louisiana (now the Archdiocese of New Orleans) came into existence, its first Bishop chose the ancient Christian symbol of the ‘pelican in her piety’ to be the principal symbol on the diocesan coat of arms,” writes the Very Rev. Paul D. Counce, a New Orleans native, past national president of the Canon Law Society of America, and pastor of St. Joseph Cathedral in Baton Rouge, in a helpful comment on a 2016 article in Country Roads Magazine by University of Louisiana at Monroe Professor of History Terry L. Jones. “Thus for Gov. Claiborne the pelican was already a well-known symbol of one of Louisiana’s principal institutions, the Church. Just as the State adopted the ecclesiastical terminology of ‘parishes’ for its territorial subdivisions, so too did the State adopt the readily-recognizable symbol of Louisiana that already existed for the local Church in international law.” (This may be the first time I’ve ever referenced an online comment posted underneath a published essay as an authoritative source, but the Very Rev. Counce certainly qualifies as a subject-matter expert).

On Dec. 20, 1803, William C.C. Claiborne, then serving as the territorial governor of Mississippi, wrote Sec. of State James Madison. “We have the satisfaction to announce to you that the province of Louisiana was this day surrendered to the United States by the commissioner of France; and to add, that the flag of our country was raised in this city amidst the acclamations of the inhabitants.” The following year, President Thomas Jefferson would nominate and the Senate would confirm Claiborne as governor of the Territory of Orleans.

Of course, Claiborne was neither French nor Catholic. His father’s family came to America from Kent, England. And he was a Protestant. In fact, after his death in 1817, Claiborne was first buried in Saint Louis Cemetery #1 in New Orleans, a resting place meant only for Catholics. His body was later exhumed and then reinterred in the ecumenical cemetery in Metairie.

Some have speculated that Claiborne’s seal had less to do with appeals to French Catholics and more to do with his association with the freemasons.

“(In 1812) Claiborne replaced an eagle on the Louisiana seal with the pelican scene still seen on the state flag today,” the Masonic Library and Museum Foundation of Louisiana explains on its website. “There is debate over the reason he chose this as the seal. However, the pelican piercing its own breast to feed its young is one of the emblems of the Masonic Degree of Knight Rose Croix, which is the 18th degree in the Scottish Rite, also known as the Knight of the Eagle and Pelican. Perhaps it was the symbol’s masonic association which led the governor to select the pelican to replace the eagle on the seal of the 18th state.”

Regardless of how or why Claiborne chose it for the state seal, there is no disputing the fact that the pelican has been a prominent part of Louisiana’s “brand” since the moment it achieved statehood. The question of its motto, however, is a little more complicated.

Conjectural View of the Government House, 1761, by Henry W. Krotzer, Jr., draftsman and artist, 1960s. Courtesy of the Historic New Orleans Collection, a gift of Leonard V. Huber. “Dating to 1761, the Government House (or State House) was one of the last governmental buildings constructed in the French regime. Depicted here in a conjectural sketch as it may have looked in 1800, it occupied a site on Decatur and Toulouse streets and survived the great fires of 1788 and 1794. Until it burned in 1828, the Government House was the seat of the Louisiana Legislature.” — “Between Colony and State: Louisiana in the Territorial Period, 1803-1812,” The Historic New Orleans Collection Quarterly, Volume XXVI, Number 4, Fall 2009.

Even though various versions of the “pelican in her piety” have been featured on the state seal since 1812 and although there had been at least one version of a flag featuring the heraldic charge in 1800, the final year in which the region was a governorate and administrative district of the Viceroyalty of New Spain, the pelican didn’t make an appearance on the state flag until January 26, 1861, the third and final day of the secession convention.

“[B]y an overwhelming vote of 113 to 17, the delegates enacted a secession ordinance, and Governor [Thomas Overton] Moore joined them in replacing the American flag with an eight-foot banner depicting a pelican feeding its young,” John Sacher, a professor of History at the University of Central Florida, writes in “‘Our Interests and Destiny Are the Same:’ Gov. Thomas Overton Moore and Confederate Loyalty,” a 2008 essay published in Louisiana History: The Journal of the Louisiana Historical Association. “Two months after severing themselves from the United States, Louisianians gave up their independence and officially joined the Confederate States of America.”

The pelican’s presence, however, was temporary, semi-official only during those two months in which Louisiana was an “independent state” and soon replaced with the Confederate battle flag.

A color-corrected approximated rendering of the flag of Louisiana’s Secession Ordinance Convention, Jan. 1861. Note the presence of a pelican in her piety in the gold canton. There are other renderings one can find online that are more precisely drawn, based on the description provided in the historical record. This image superimposes the colors on an actual “Bible-sized” flag that belongs to a private collection. Image credit: Lamar White, Jr. | Bayou Brief.

It’s also during the secession convention that we find the first official reference to a new motto. An excerpt from an article published in the Defiance Democrat of Defiance, Ohio, Aug. 14, 1869:

Significantly, much like the pelican flag that may have flown in the final year of Spanish rule, Louisiana had a different motto before joining the United States: Non Sibi, Sed Suis, which translates from Latin as “Not for oneself, but for one’s own” (the more colloquial translation is, “Not for oneself, but for others”). This should sound familiar to any graduate of the original University of Louisiana, which was founded in 1834 but privatized and renamed in 1888 to honor its most generous benefactor, Paul Tulane of Princeton, New Jersey. Tulane’s seal features the heraldic charge of the pelican in her piety, as well as the declaration in Latin.

Similar Latin expressions have been used to caption the pelican in piety for centuries. Take, for example, this medal from 1667 honoring Pope Clement IX. Aliis Non, Sibi Clemens (Mercy for others, not for himself).

Source: Virtus Collection

But in Louisiana, prior to the Civil War, objects with the heraldic charge of the pelican in her piety paired with the phrase “I die for those I love” were usually family crests, and almost exclusively, the expression was in French. Certainly it had never been used as a motto of state government. After all, Louisiana already had a motto: Justice, Union, Confidence. The motto was changed to Union, Justice, Confidence at the beginning of Reconstruction.

Indeed, the first documented record of the motto proposed by state Rep. Nelson—”We live and die for those we love”— was in Richard Wilmer’s 1865 novel The Heroine of the Confederacy: Truth and Justice:

Source: Archive.org

The expression disappears nearly entirely during Reconstruction, and importantly, reemerges only after President Rutherford B. Hayes recalled federal troops from Louisiana and handed control of state government back to the virulently white supremacist Southern Democrats who had been largely sidelined in the 12 years that had elapsed since Lee’s surrender at Appomattox.

Less than five months after the end of Reconstruction, on Sept. 16, 1877, there’s a reference in the Times-Picayune to a poem written by Timothy Linkiwater and performed by “little Katie Brown” that includes the line “I live and die for those I love.”

In 1879, the Louisiana Bond Commission created an unofficial state seal with the pelican in her piety and the motto underneath. At the time, several state departments created their own versions of the state seal, all featuring the pelican. It also appeared on a Louisiana New Consolidated Bond in 1892.

Louisiana New Consolidated Bond, 1892. Courtesy of state Rep. Richard Nelson, State of Louisiana.

The 1886 compendium Miscellaneous Literary, Scientific, and Historical Notes, Queries, and Answers, for Teachers, Pupils, Practical and Professional Men includes the mottos of what was then the country’s 45 states and territories. “Louisiana—’Justice, Union, and Confidence.’ There is another motto attributed to this State: ‘We live and die for those we love.’ Supposed to allude to the pelican and her young in the State arms.”

****

Why was there a competing state motto?

Unfortunately, we can only speculate; however, considering its emergence both in the immediate aftermath of secession and then again in post-Reconstruction Louisiana and in the first two decades of the 20th century, a period in which the Lost Cause Movement was ascendant, it seems fairly obvious that the motto, with its bellicose and macabre undertones, offered a way to signal support for the secessionist and later the Confederate cause and to pay tribute to the “sacrifices” of Louisiana troops killed during the Civil War, while also making a clear distinction with the official motto, which happened to prominently feature the word “Union.”

As an added bonus, like many tropes of the era, common in both the North and the South, the expression also cloaked itself in the language of religion.

All of this is worth consideration, because although the expression has occasionally resurfaced in recent years (“We live for those we love” is etched onto the cornerstone of the state Capitol, and a similar statement appears on the licenses issued by the Louisiana Bar Association. The phrase was also mentioned during a 2015 legislative prayer breakfast, which may explain its inclusion, only a few months later, in Gov. John Bel Edwards’ first inaugural address), its meaning to the men who popularized its use as an expression of state government still matters.

“As you noted, I have significant other battles going on in the legislature,” Nelson wrote in an email responding to my questions about the motto (I also commended him for his bills on marijuana decriminalization and ending life sentences for juvenile offenders), “and this is just a simple bill to change something I thought could be improved. If it is controversial beyond just the normal resistance to any kind of change, I will just park the bill.”

Mayor LaToya Cantrell: New Orleans is the right place, and this is the right time, for infrastructure investment.

On Wednesday, May 6, 2021, President Joe Biden and New Orleans Mayor LaToya Cantrell tour the Sewerage and Water Board’s outmoded Carrollton water plant. Photo credit: Meghan Hays, White House Director of Message Planning.

On May 3, 1978, New Orleans experienced one of its worst flood events, with nearly nine inches of rain falling before noon, inundating the city with two to five feet of flooding, and leaving parents to pick up their schoolchildren in canoes. In the years since and as we continue to grow, so do the climate challenges we face. According to the National Weather Service, April 2021 was the second wettest this city has experienced in the last 20 years, receiving nearly 13 inches of rain when the average is fewer than six.

When President Biden outlined plans for $2.3 trillion worth of investments in the nation’s infrastructure, we knew what this could mean for New Orleans. That’s because we understand what critical federal investment in infrastructure looks like, and how to make it work effectively and efficiently for our residents.

Why? Because we’re doing it right now. We are taking federal dollars and rapidly implementing green, blue, and traditional grey infrastructure improvements in a city with some of the oldest, most neglected streets and deteriorating water, sewer, and drainage lines in the United States.

We are— to borrow a phrase from President Biden— building back better.

President Joe Biden speaks with Louisiana Gov. John Bel Edwards in Lake Charles, Louisiana on May 6, 2021. Following his trip to Lake Charles, Biden stopped in New Orleans, where he visited an antiquated water plant, before heading back to Washington. Image by the Bayou Brief. Photo courtesy of @LouisianaGov / Twitter.

Last month, the Gentilly neighborhood celebrated the completion of the $15.5 million FEMA-funded Pontilly Stormwater Management Network, which incorporates a large bioswale, pervious concrete walking paths, and parking lanes, as well as formerly vacant lots transformed into beautiful pocket parks. All told, this network of interventions can store more than eight million gallons of stormwater and reduce flooding as much as 14 inches during a 10-year rain event.

And when a Pontilly resident and neighborhood leader says,“We’ve watched it work. Over the past couple of months, with the rain events we’ve had, we actually saw how the process worked – how it fills up, how it slowly goes out. It’s been actually saving us from flooding.” How gratifying is it to hear those words? And to know that we are getting it done – and done well!

At this moment, more than 60 roadwork projects are under construction across the city, and within six months 10 more projects funded by FEMA and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development resilience funds will enter the construction phase. We are quickly becoming a model for how to build back a resilient and sustainable city.

And given the more than $2.3 billion in spending involved in this work, our local businesses are now in a position to participate and succeed in completing this work. Engineers, designers, builders, and laborers are all able to work and – one day soon – export these new, next-generation skills in building better, tougher community assets throughout our nation.

On Wednesday, May 6, 2021, President Joe Biden and New Orleans Mayor LaToya Cantrell tour the Sewerage and Water Board’s outmoded Carrollton water plant. Photo credit: Justen Williams | 343 Media.

While the COVID-19 pandemic wrought an historic and tragic impact onto our city, it also forced us to navigate the complexity of continuing our infrastructure work during an unprecedented time. We accelerated projects not in spite of the COVID-19 pandemic, but in part because of the pandemic, knowing full well that pushing them out— while following safety guidelines— could keep a critical part of our economy moving forward.

Along the way, creating more equitable, accessible and safer streets for all who use them, whether driving, bicycling or walking. As we implement our Moving New Orleans Bikes plan, we’re repaving roads and sidewalks and creating Americans with Disabilities Act-accessible curbs. These will make for smoother streets as we work to re-imagine our regional transit system with the recently approved New Links plan in coordination with the Regional Transit Authority and the Regional Planning Commission.

We’re also working to improve other facets of our infrastructure. We’re doing it with Solar for All NOLA, a clean energy initiative available to homeowners and small businesses through the financial and resiliency benefits of rooftop solar. We’re doing it with the recently announced Advanced Broadband and the “Smart City” Request for Proposals (RFP). With this RFP, we’re seeking proposals to deliver broadband connectivity and a host of Smart City solutions that will improve City services, improve quality of life, promote economic development and bridge the digital divide. We’re doing it by bringing to service six plug-in hybrid electric trucks and charging stations at the SWBNO’s Central Yard. And we’re also teaming up with Entergy to build as many as 56 charging stations for electric cars with resident input on their locations.

All told, we spend more than $5 million every week on infrastructure projects, and as of December 2020, more than 1,100 new jobs had been created as part of the City’s infrastructure program.

Our rapid implementation of so many projects translates to a lot of work for the many small businesses that fuel our economy. And we’re doing it equitably so that everyone has an opportunity to participate. Earlier this year, I announced a restructuring of the procurement process to improve participation in and overall accountability of our supplier diversity program.

President Joe Biden and LaToya Cantrell tour the Sewerage and Water Board’s Carrollton water plant on May 6, 2021. Photo credit: Justen Williams | 343 Media.

Wherever you look in President Biden’s infrastructure plans, you see New Orleans.

Investments in HBCUs? We have Xavier University of Louisiana, Dillard University, and Southern University-New Orleans.

Investments in transportation? We’re fixing our streets and sewer lines, building out a connected bikeway network and re-imagining our regional transit system, all while featuring one of the nation’s newest airport terminals, one of the nation’s busiest ports, and soon, a return of connected rail lines along the Mississippi Gulf Coast.

Investments in workforce development? Our Office of Workforce Development has provided more than 1,545 new job seekers with employment and training services, employed 221 youth through the Youth Works NOLA Mayor’s Summer Employment Program, and secured $5 million awarded from JP Morgan Chase AdvancingCities to provide training for job seekers and small businesses to support employment opportunities in the blue and green infrastructure industry sectors.

Investments in Affordable Housing? We’ve secured millions of dollars for rental assistance to prevent evictions during the pandemic, relaunched the Soft Second Down Payment Assistance Program, increased the amount of down payment assistance from $35,000 to $45,000 in keeping with the increase cost of housing, and by the end of 2020 had 525 affordable housing units under construction and approximately 800 housing units in predevelopment. The City’s Office of Housing Policy and Community Development in 2020 secured more than $18.5 million in new funding for affordable housing and community development projects.

We have positioned our city to be Ground Zero for infrastructure investment.

New Orleans Mayor LaToya Cantrell and President Joe Biden in New Orleans on May 6, 2021. Photo credit: Justen Williams | 343 Media.

When President Biden announced the American Rescue Plan and what it could mean for New Orleans, we transformed our COVID-19 Reopening Advisory Panel into the Stimulus Command Task Force, focusing on how to put federal dollars to work. This is what we do: ensuring that our residents get their fair share. We did it with our Fair Share campaign to direct tax revenue more fairly into the Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans’ work to fix our aging pipes, we did it with federal dollars to improve our roads AND pipes, and we’re doing it with the stimulus package.

Federal dollars to move this city forward as we continue our Road to Recovery? We got this.

The (Second) Louisiana Progressive?

Left to right: Congressman-elect Troy Carter (D-LA02) and the late Congressman Whitmill Pugh Martin (P-LA03)

“I am going back and [will] tell the North it must follow in the footsteps of the Progressives of Louisiana.”

—Theodore Roosevelt, Sept. 8, 1914.

“When Col. Roosevelt, Bull Moose, retired to his berth aboard a speeding Pullman at midnight Monday night, apparently, he was the happiest man in the nation,” The Times-Picayune reported the following day. The congressional midterm elections were only a couple of months away, and the former president was back on the trail, hoping to whip up support for a slate of candidates who promised to make life difficult for Democrat Woodrow Wilson. “Fourteen hours of most strenuous receptions, conversations, and orations had left him a tired [man]…. But those same fourteen hours had gone to confirm in his mind his belief that the Progressive party is about to achieve that dream of a quarter of a century, the breaking of the Solid South, and he was content.”

Two years before, in 1912, Theodore Roosevelt had fallen short in his bid for a political comeback and a then-unprecedented third term in the White House, this time running not as a Republican but as a member of his own party. He’d founded the Progressive Party, also known as the Bull Moose Party, after losing the Republican nomination to his handpicked successor in the White House, William Howard Taft.

A banquet honoring President Theodore Roosevelt during his visit to New Orleans in 1905. Source: Louisiana Digital Library.

He’d actually visited New Orleans before, once in 1905 at the beginning of his second term in the White House and again in 1912 for a brief stop during his campaign against Taft and Wilson.

But the Roosevelt who arrived in New Orleans at 7:50 a.m. on the morning of Monday, Sept. 7, 1914 was different. In the span of under two years, Teddy Roosevelt, who continues to hold the distinction of being the youngest person ever elected to the presidency, was suddenly, at the age of only 55, an old man.

Just four months earlier, Roosevelt had returned from South America, where he’d taken a harrowing expedition in search of an uncharted, mythical river, the River of Doubt, deep into the heart of the Amazonian darkness. The journey had nearly killed him, but it also had left no doubt about his status as an American icon.

At the time of his trip to New Orleans, he was arguably the most famous and most admired person in the entire country.

Initially, he planned on staying for less than a day, but when the state’s future governor, John M. Parker, a prominent New Orleans cotton broker and “the chief Progressive organizer in the South,” wrote a “passionate letter” urging him to also visit Louisiana’s third congressional district, also known as the “Sugar Bowl,” where, suddenly, there appeared to be an opportunity for Progressives to pick up a bunch of votes, Roosevelt agreed to extend his stay.

After a full day in New Orleans, capped off with a speech in front of a sold-out audience of 5,000 people at the French Opera House, he left by his private train the following morning for the small town of Franklin, where two out of every three residents had signed a petition urging him to visit.

From Franklin, he headed by car to New Iberia for a public speech. Along the way, he made a brief stop in Jeanerette. Several hundred people had gathered just to catch a glimpse of the former president. But nothing would compare to the reception that awaited him in New Iberia.

A cartoon of Theodore Roosevelt in anticipation of his visit to New Orleans published in the Sept. 7, 1914 edition of the Times-Picayune.

Mayor Alphe Fontelieu had organized a calvary of some 400 bandana-clad, mounted Rough Riders to intercept him in the outskirts of town.

“Colonel,” the mayor told him, “we have a horse for you and wish you to take command of our troop.” Roosevelt joyfully accepted and led the entourage into town where, according to news reports, a crowd estimated to be anywhere from 10,000 to 15,000 people packed the streets of downtown.

“Roosevelt addressed the crowd in sections because of its size,” wrote Richard Collins, a former history professor at LSU, in his 1971 article “Theodore Roosevelt’s Visit to New Orleans and the Progressive Campaign of 1914.” “He received his most enthusiastic applause when he concluded in French.”

On the way back to New Orleans that afternoon, he made more than 20 different stops, and in each town, massive crowds gathered for a chance to see the old Bull Moose in person.

While his two-day, nearly-nonstop visit to Louisiana was an undeniable success, it remained unclear whether his presence alone would be enough to ensure victories for the men running under his Progressive banner.

Only a day before his train pulled into the station at the foot of Canal, Louisiana Progressives had seemed hopelessly deadlocked as they met in New Iberia to select their party’s nominee for the third district. Finally, on the 119th ballot, a local judge, 47-year-old Whitmell Pugh Martin, emerged as the party’s choice. Prior to joining the bench, Whit Martin had been the area’s district attorney, and before that, he served as superintendent of schools. But despite his impressive resume, Martin faced an uphill battle in what was effectively a one-party state.

“When the first Louisiana Progressive convention met in New Orleans on August 3, 1912, most of the new Bull Moose were old Republicans from the sugar producing parishes,” noted Collins. “The Republicans had been a part of the Lily White faction of the Republican Party whose main political impetus had been opposition to Democratic free trade practices. With Republicans in office nationally the Lily White Republicans were reduced to ineffectual internal squabbling. In spite of a Progressive campaign trip to New Orleans in 1912 and a favorable court decision placing the Progressives on the ballot without a primary, the results of the 1912 election were disastrous to Louisiana’s Progressives. Wilson won Louisiana with 60,966 votes, trailed by Roosevelt with 9,323, and Taft with 3,834.”

Teddy Roosevelt (right) would return to Louisiana in 1915, when John Parker (left) invited him on a bird-watching expedition on the aptly-named Bird Island, which has subsequently disappeared due to coastal degradation. The following year, as a member of Roosevelt’s Progressive Party, Parker was defeated in his bid for Louisiana governor. Months later, he secured the Vice Presidential nomination of the Progressive Party, but the party would spiral into obscurity after Roosevelt defected back to the GOP. Parker would subsequently rejoin the Democratic Party, and in 1920, he was elected Louisiana’s 37th governor.

There was reason for guarded optimism, however, provided that Progressive candidates in Louisiana could get their message in front of voters before Election Day.

During Wilson’s first year in office, he made good on a campaign promise and signed into law the Revenue Act of 1913, better known in its day as the Underwood-Simmons Act. The law re-established federal income taxes and dramatically reduced tariff rates, landmark legislation that fundamentally reshaped the way government collected most of its revenue and had long been a priority for Democrats nationwide.

There was just one problem, at least for Democrats in Louisiana.

Buried in the legislation was a provision that not only reduced tariffs on imported sugar; it called for their complete elimination by the year 1916. This was an issue that created an opening for Louisiana Progressives, and they were eager to exploit it.

“[Judge Martin] offered the most ingenious argument for local Progressivism by asserting that he had not left the Democratic Party but rather that the Democratic Party, by renouncing its pledges and principles, had left its constituents,” Collins explained.

In what had seemed inconceivable only a few months before, that November, Whit Martin prevailed over Democrat Henri L. Gueydan, 57%-43%, carrying five of the district’s eight parishes and becoming the first Progressive candidate from the South to win a congressional election.

It would take another 58 years before Louisiana voters would send someone other than a Democrat to Congress. In 1972, future governor Dave Treen became Louisiana’s first Republican member of Congress since Reconstruction, winning the same seat once held by Martin.

In 1916, again running as a Progressive, Martin won reelection by razor-thin margin, only 99 votes, against the young sheriff of St. Martin Parish, Wade O. Martin, Sr. (That’s right. U.S. Rep. Martin’s opponent was a Martin from St. Martin Parish).

1916 also marked the beginning of the end for the Progressive Party. Roosevelt rejoined the Republicans, and John M. Parker, his friend and chief organizer in the South, switched back to the Democratic Party.

For his part, beginning in 1918, U.S. Rep. Whit Martin would never face another opponent again, serving an additional six consecutive terms, all as a Democrat, until his death in 1929.

Martin was not only Louisiana’s first and only Progressive to win a federal election, he also remains the only person in state history to have served in the United States Congress without being a member of either the Democratic or the Republican parties.

****

Congressman-elect Troy Carter addresses supporters at his victory party on the night of April 24, 2021 after defeating state Sen. Karen Carter-Peterson in a runoff election for Louisiana’s Second Congressional District. 15 years prior, Carter and Carter-Peterson both fell short in their bids to oust incumbent U.S. Rep. William “Dollar Bill” Jefferson. Photo courtesy of Big Easy Magazine.

Last month, when Louisiana state Sen. Troy Carter defeated his Democratic colleague, state Sen. Karen Carter-Peterson, in a special election to fill former U.S. Rep. Cedric Richmond’s seat in the Second Congressional District, the press, particularly the national press, declared that his victory amounted to a repudiation of progressivism. While it is undeniably true that his opponent made more direct appeals to far-left and leftist voters and to a constellation of like-minded national organizations and SuperPACs, it also gives the false impression that either Carter’s campaign or his record were somehow not, on balance, substantively progressive.

Both Carter and Carter-Peterson are veteran politicians. In fact, this isn’t the first time they’ve squared off against one another in a congressional race. 15 years ago, they both attempted to unseat the disgraced incumbent, William “Dollar Bill” Jefferson. Carter finished in fifth; Carter-Peterson narrowly captured a spot in the runoff but was ultimately unable to dismantle the machine that had made the Jefferson family into one of New Orleans’ most powerful political dynasties.

This year’s race between the two Carters was complicated by the strong performance of Baton Rouge activist Gary Chambers in the jungle primary, where he finished in third place with 21% of the vote, only two points behind Carter-Peterson. He polled surprisingly well in Orleans Parish, even winning a plurality of votes in Carter-Peterson’s own state senate district.

On July 15, 2016, Gary Chambers (left) officiated the funeral service at Southern University for Alton Sterling. The service featured remarks from the Revs. Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson (right). Photo credit: Lamar White, Jr.

The 35-year-old Chambers, an erstwhile pastor turned social media provocateur and activist, had previously mounted two unsuccessful campaigns for Baton Rouge Metro Council and State Senate District 15, losing both in landslides.

Last summer, he attracted a massive following on social media after briefly earning national attention for a viral video in which he excoriates a member of the local school board for shopping online during a discussion on changing the name of Robert E. Lee High School. But he started drawing attention in the Baton Rouge area in 2014, when he began publishing the Rouge Collection, a website he promoted as a “Baton Rouge’s black-owned media platform” but that ultimately became more like a personal blog (prior to that, Chambers’ only other documented venture in political advocacy had been a quixotic effort to launch a boycott against the rap artist Meek Mill, who Chambers believed to be blasphemous). It’s also worth noting that after the police killing of Alton Sterling in 2016, Chambers played a prominent role in the subsequent protests and was asked by the Sterling family to officiate the public funeral service, where he shared the stage with the Revs. Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson.

He was recruited to run for the open congressional seat by Shaun King, a Kentucky native and controversial Black Lives Matter activist (“one of the most followed and shared activists and journalists in the world,” he boasts on his website, The North Star) who has generated intense criticism from fellow activists, including DeRay Mckesson (“[The] person who paints your house before he steals your car has still committed theft,” Mckesson wrote of King in a detailed critique published on Medium in 2019).

King began promoting Chambers as a potential candidate as early as Nov. 17, 2020, the day that Richmond announced he would be stepping down from Congress in order to take a job with the incoming Biden administration. Two weeks later and more than a month before Chambers would officially declare his candidacy, King heralded the Baton Rouge activist on his website, publishing an article underneath the headline “Shaun King: Gary Chambers Is the Revolutionary Candidate We Need” and urging readers to donate directly to Chambers. The goal, he said, was to raise $250,000.

According to reports filed with the FEC, Chambers, all told, raised approximately $400,000, with the overwhelming majority of his financial support from out-of-state donors. Among his itemized contributions, he received more money from one state, California, than he did from the state he sought to represent in Congress. His two biggest donations in Louisiana, a pair of $2,500 checks, appear to be from business entities, which would be a violation of federal campaign finance law. On Jan. 19, he reported receiving $2,500 from Parker’s Pharmacy in Baton Rouge; ten days later, he received the other $2,500 from LaFleur Industries, a Baton Rouge-based affordable housing developer. (His top two California donors were tech entrepreneur Adam Pisoni and the actress Milla Jovavich).

Chambers’ confrontational approach and his knack for self-promotion may have been already familiar to voters in Baton Rouge, where, in the jungle primary, he finished in second and two points behind Karen Carter-Peterson with 33% of the vote. But in Orleans Parish, he was largely unknown, which is why his second place finish there was so surprising (two points ahead of Carter-Peterson with 27% but still well behind Carter, who captured 39%). He fashioned himself as an unapologetically leftist candidate, advocating in favor of free college, student loan forgiveness, reparations (or a study to assess reparations), and a single-payer healthcare system. All of which are policy positions that would find a larger audience and greater appeal in New Orleans than anywhere else in the district. It’s why, for example, he earned the endorsement (albeit tepid) of Antigravity Magazine, which noted a peculiar exchange that occurred when he was asked about Shaun King:

“When Chambers was questioned about his association with King, he got defensive, saying ‘I’m not your typical person running for office, I’m loyal to those who are loyal to me.’ Bit of a reactionary tautology there. Chambers later said, ‘So take this note early, don’t ever come at me about who I associate with.’” 

For Carter-Peterson, Chambers’ endorsement, which he provided only after announcing he intended to interview both remaining candidates, was considered critical. Ultimately, however, although he did promote her on social media, Chambers proved to be a non-factor (and perhaps not as loyal as he proclaimed himself to be). In an interview with The Advocate, Chambers faulted Carter-Peterson for not carrying Orleans Parish in the runoff (“That’s more a reflection on Karen and less on me”) but appeared to take credit for her winning the majority of the vote in East Baton Rouge Parish, claiming her victory in the state’s capital city was a repudiation of the “political elites” and the “political establishment.” Never mind that Carter-Peterson, until only recently, had been the chair of the Louisiana Democratic Party for the past eight years and the vice chair of civic engagement and voter participation for the Democratic National Committee.

Chambers also recently announced the launch of a new nonprofit, Bigger Than Me, which his friend Shaun King enthusiastically reported under the headline, “Gary Chambers launches a brilliant new organization to help progressives across the Deep South.”

It could be that Chambers’ performance in the jungle primary is evidence of an impending seismic shift in the politics of Louisiana’s Second Congressional District. It may also be that this is what could happen when someone leverages a massive social media following in order to raise close to a half a million dollars for a ten week campaign. Or, possibly, Chambers primarily attracted people searching for a “protest candidate.” More than one Chambers voter tweeted that they ignored his endorsement advice and voted for Troy Carter in the runoff.

However his role is characterized, he did manage to move Karen Carter-Peterson further to the left.

Both runoff candidates had long track records of supporting criminal justice reform, LGBTQ equality, raising the minimum wage, equal pay, and a litany of other Democratic priorities. And although they took different approaches, both also backed “Medicare for All” proposals.

They differed slightly on one key issue: The Green New Deal.

Carter-Peterson unabashedly supported it, earning her the endorsement of Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez among others. Carter, on the other hand, said he supported the Green New Deal as a “framework.” For what it’s worth, they also both signed a pledge to not accept campaign donations in excess of $200 from anyone associated with the oil and gas industry, and after certain donations were flagged, both claimed they had returned the money in controversy.

Carter-Peterson’s decision to make the Green New Deal one of her signature priorities was a calculated risk. The district is home to Cancer Alley, which, more than almost anywhere else in the country, had suffered the public health consequences and the disastrous effects of economic dependency on an under-regulated, exploitative, and all-powerful industry. There are even fewer places that have experienced the realities of environmental racism more than Cancer Alley.

If you were to poll the district on the individual components of the Green New Deal, you’d likely find overwhelming support. But one recent internal poll of the district, according to a source with direct knowledge of its findings, revealed that fewer than 30% of voters support the general concept of a Green New Deal. Much like Obamacare (at least initially), the term itself— Green New Deal— has already been negatively defined by its conservative opponents.

Even though the district is majority Black and skews overwhelmingly in favor of Democrats, this is Louisiana, after all, and it shouldn’t be too much of a surprise that voters need more than gimmicky slogans before they can be convinced that the solution isn’t worse than the problem it seeks to address.

#StopFormosaPlastics: St. James (Formosa site). Photo by RISE St. James. Image transformed by Bayou Brief.

Consider, for example, St. James Parish, a tiny and sparsely populated sliver of the Acadian Coast situated in between New Orleans and Baton Rouge and perhaps best known for the plantation forced labor camp, Oak Alley. The parish is home to nearly the same number of White residents as Black residents (48% White, 50% Black), and typically, those voters give Democratic candidates a heavy advantage. The last Republican to carry a majority in St. James Parish was Warren G. Harding in 1920.

Last December, after only a month’s notice, Shell Oil closed down its refinery in Convent, Louisiana, which had been the backbone of the local economy and a “mainstay” of the parish since the 1960s. The refinery was outmoded, and, according to Shell, it prevented the company from achieving its goal of reducing carbon emissions. While its closure was an unequivocal victory for the environment and an inevitability for an industry that depends on a non-renewable resource, that’s hardly a consolation for the 400 contractors and 695 employees who suddenly found themselves out of a job.

Up against this backdrop is the construction of an enormously controversial $9.4 billion plastics “complex” by the Taiwan-based Formosa, the world’s sixth-largest chemical company. The plastics plant promises to add 1,200 new jobs to the local economy.

Karen Carter-Peterson vowed to fight against its construction. Troy Carter said he would hold Formosa accountable for any damage they inflict and would work to end the current practice of self-reporting and ensure that an objective third-party monitors emissions instead.

The tiny parish of 22,000 drew outsized attention during the runoff election, and it was the only parish in which voter turnout exceeded 20% (22.7%, to be precise).

Troy Carter carried St. James Parish, 66%-34%.

****

What does it mean to be a Louisiana progressive? And what does any of this have to do with the election of Whit Martin in 1914?

In Roosevelt’s era, the term “progressive” obviously carried different connotations than it does today and even than it did in the years that immediately followed.

Huey P. Long embraced the label, naming his very own propaganda outlet Louisiana Progress (he changed its name to American Progress when he began setting his sights on the White House).

If there’s a consistent theme that connects the progressives of the Bull Moose generation to the progressives of today, it’s a shared opposition to the concentration of wealth and a belief that corporate influence and power distorts our democracy.

But progressivism has always been flexible and not rigidly dogmatic. No matter what label you prefer, competing parochial interests are a part of practically all policymaking, and what could appear to be progressive in one place may seem regressive in another. Take, for example, tariffs on sugar. Cheaper, imported sugar is great for everyone, except if you live in Louisiana’s “Sugar Bowl.”

Huey P. Long and a Ramos gin fizz. Photo credit: Leon Trice. Photo source: Tulane Digital Library. Image credit: Bayou Brief

We may all agree that the Army Corps of Engineers needs to pull the permits for the mega-billion dollar Formosa plant, but if you are one of the thousands of voters—predominately Democratic voters, mind you—who either recently lost your job or has a family member of friend who lost their job at the now-mothballed Shell refinery and the only thing you see in the horizon is Formosa, with its promise of creating 1,200 jobs, then you probably aren’t all that interested in hearing about all of the theoretical jobs that could be created under a “Green New Deal;” instead, you want to know how your congressman or congresswoman intends on ensuring you can find work without having to move away from the place you have always called home.

Troy Carter may be a “moderate” compared to Karen Carter-Peterson; he’s certainly more moderate than Gary Chambers. But as Stephanie Grace of The Times-Picayune recently pointed out: Look at the folks standing beside him on Election Night.

“If voters had rejected progressivism,” she writes, “and if Carter was running away from it, then why was [Orleans Parish District Attorney Jason] Williams there? And what was City Council President Helena Moreno, another of the city’s leading progressive politicians, doing on stage with him? Clearly, something else was going on here.”

The irony to all of this is that the election was framed as a battle between a moderate or even right-leaning conservative versus a principled progressive not because voters in the district came to define it as such but because out-of-state SuperPACs and interest groups spent vast sums of money—both in support of Carter-Peterson and against her—selling this narrative.

This wasn’t, as the great James Carville said, rejection of “wokeness,” because to quote from the headline of Grace’s column, wokeness “was never on the Congressional ballot.” (To be fair to Carville, he elaborates on his general thesis about “wokeness” in a recent interview with Vox’s Sean Illing, and placed within the larger context, his analysis makes a great deal of sense).

Again, was Carter-Peterson “more” progressive than Carter? Yes. But if the Republicans in Jefferson Parish who turned out to vote for Troy Carter believe that he’s somehow ideologically aligned with them, I imagine they are in for a surprise. That said, if he proves to be a humiliating embarrassment to the people who stood on stage with him on Election Night, especially D.A. Williams, who Carter called “the leader of the progressive movement,” the seat won’t be his for long.

Unfortunately, as many anticipated, the runoff election between the two Carters became unusually negative and, at times, unsettlingly personal. The final televised forum, at least in my opinion, was difficult to watch, with both spending most of their allotted time either accusing each other of lying or defending themselves against an accusation of lying, and at some point, it became obvious that the two previously had a warm relationship. Carter-Peterson reminded Carter that, not long ago, he had taken a photo with her husband and that he knew her mother and had known her late father. It’s difficult to imagine how anyone watching at home could’ve left feeling inspired by the exchange, but it did prove at least one thing: New Orleans is, in many ways, still a small town, and Louisiana is still a small state.

****

Nearly 80 years ago, U.S. Sen. Tom Connally, a Democrat from the tiny town of Marlin, Texas, quipped, “Anyone who thinks they know everything there is to know about politics should go down to Louisiana and take a postgraduate course.”

It’s still solid advice, especially if you’re planning on spending money to introduce voters to people they already know.

“Some Thoughts” on the Life of New Orleans Renaissance Man Michael Martin

This is not an obituary. 

More than anything, this is a humble celebration of Michael Scott Martin, who passed rather suddenly this past week

I was surprised to learn that he was 63, as I always imagined him as being stuck perpetually at some level beyond ages. He had such a lovely and iconically timeless attitude that would’ve gone well in any era— sometimes wise, sometimes wise-ass, but always fair.

Anyone could trust him to provide an honest comment, and to deliver it not with coated sugar, but at least a kind-sounding smirk. Even his most cynical and aggressive social media responses were punctuated with that special grin of his, one that wouldn’t let anyone off of his shit list, but would send all away in a slightly better mood than before.

At least, that’s how I felt. 

Hotcakes, from Michael’s Youtube channel

The first time I learned of him was from former New Orleans area filmmaker Jo Custer’s short movie Hotcakes. It’s set in a bar that might as well be a waiting place in purgatory, where three men spend their time talking mysteriously and eating pancakes (of course).

Michael was not one of the three leads, but instead played a hazy-looking, scatter-shot-sounding resident/patron/prisoner of this establishment.

“No one should ever come here. I had teeth when I came here,” he exclaims, before joyfully grabbing a shall in a scene straight from some David Lynch film. 

Ignoring the plethora of online conversations we shared, the only time we ever spoke to each other on this real plane, was one evening over the phone. He had a line on a new writing opportunity and wanted to go over some information about it. I was out of my depth talking with him, as he was multiple charming steps ahead, with many witticisms that flowed ever so naturally.

I could hear his husband Eric in the background who, according to Michael, needed to rest. “Excuse me, Bill,” he said most respectfully. I could hear him sweetly talking with Eric, assisting him into a more comfortable arrangement.

I smiled, listening to this play out. 

Bloody Nose, Empty Pockets trailer

His most mainstream role will go down as playing a version of himself in the independent and New Orleans shot film Bloody Nose, Empty Pockets. In a way, this works as a bookend to Hotcakes, except here he is front and center.

Why cast him in bars? Because it’s New Orleans, and people love going out and being together. And Michael was someone I would’ve loved hanging out with in person, but swap bar for The Prytania Theatre.

His Twitter archive is still up, and it’s filled with a life of his own.

Michael was of course more than 280-character quips, but I’m not sure how else to finish this piece off than with a most serendipitous final word from the man himself:

Donate to his GoFundMe.

Attend these benefit performances and his memorial block party.

Watch his films.

Be with people (safely). 

Write like you have nothing to lose. Everytime. 

Publisher’s note: A few months before he passed away, upon request, Michael provided the Bayou Brief with the two portrait photographs included in this tribute for use in a film review. Both photographs are the work of Louis Maistros.