Saturday, March 15, 2025

Governor Candidates: That’s My Story and I’m Sticking to It

Fewer than 20 days remain until the statewide primary election, and while voters may not be either besotted or benumbed by the puffery of political ads, Monday’s Baton Rouge Press Club forum for the three leading gubernatorial candidates had the Capitol press corps endeavoring to get the guys to deliver some substance, in lieu of simple slogans.

Acting anchorman for the forum, Jim Engster, president of the Louisiana Radio Network and host for Gov. John Bel Edwards’ monthly radio show, apparently hadn’t gotten the memo. He started out by lobbing a softball, asking, “Have you ever been a member of another political party, and why are you a member of the party you represent now?”

Gov. Edwards said he had always been a Democrat, since he first registered to vote at the age of 18.

“I’m a Democrat because I believe we have an obligation to do what we can on behalf of all our brothers and sisters, and to lift up those who have not traditionally had every available opportunity,” Edwards added.

Republican Eddie Rispone admitted he started out as a Democrat, but, “That changed when I began working. I believe we need to teach people to fish, not just have them depend on us.”

“I registered as a Democrat at 18,” GOP Congressman Ralph Abraham said. “I didn’t know better then: Now I do. I’m pro-life, pro-gun, and pro-personal fiscal responsibility – all Republican values.”

Next to quiz the candidates was the Associated Press’ Louisiana politics maven Melinda Deslatte. Acknowledging that Gov. Edwards has based much of his campaign on a theme of finally moving past the fiscal mismanagement of the Jindal years, Deslatte asked Rispone and Abraham to clearly state their views on former Gov. Bobby Jindal.

Eddie Rispone (left) and Ralph Abraham (right). Photo by Sue Lincoln.

“Bobby Jindal isn’t running. I am,” said Rispone, who was greatly engaged – philosophically and financially – in lobbying for Jindal’s education reforms in 2012. And instead of expounding further, Rispone launched a couple of of his catchphrases.

“We need a sea change. I’m the only candidate saying we need a constitutional convention,” Rispone said.

“I agreed with the early Bobby Jindal, who stood for less government, less taxes and more personal responsibility. That’s the Republican mantra, and it’s good for the country and good for our state,” Abraham said.

“When Bobby Jindal came into office he had a one-and-a-half billion dollar surplus, and he left office with a two billion dollar deficit,” Edwards stated. “He plundered the state’s trust funds and left us in the ditch. But now, officially, the national and international credit-granting agencies have designated our fiscal outlook as ‘positive’. We don’t want to go back.”

I had the next question.

“None of you seem willing to utter the words ‘climate change’, much less discuss it, so how do you expect to convince the nation and world of the urgency of our coastal land loss? How can you get anyone to believe we are not a ‘sacrifice zone,’ if we won’t require the oil and gas industry to fix the damage they’ve caused?”

Ralph Abraham had the first response.

“One of my jobs has been as a farmer, and part of that includes protecting the environment,” the veterinarian-turned-physician-turned-congressman said. “There has been lots of controversy over how to protect the coastline, but the one thing we absolutely need to do is stop the legacy lawsuits. The oil and gas industry wants to help, yet we’re not sitting at the table with them to figure out how best to do that. Meanwhile, we’re losing our fishing and oyster industries.”

“When it comes to climate change, Louisiana has a crucial role to play. For every coal-fired power plant that goes offline, they’re converting to cleaner burning natural gas, and that benefits Louisiana’s economy,” Gov. Edwards said. “Right now, we have more coastal restoration projects under way than ever before, because we made sure we paid back the coastal funds the previous administration had raided.”

Gov. John Bel Edwards, holding copy of Abraham lawsuit against oil and gas companies. Photo by Sue Lincoln

“And regarding the coastal lawsuits,” he added, “I have not filed a single one. On the other hand, my opponent Ralph Abraham has sued the oil and gas industry.”

The governor walked back to his table, away from the lectern, and picked a document out of the file folder there. “Here it is,” he said, smilingly waving a copy of the lawsuit.

Rispone, unsurprisingly, gave an answer that cheered industry and booed government.

“Industry has done the most to recognize the issue of global warming, and to promote environmental safety,” the founder of ISC Constructors said. “We need to work with them, instead of suing the oil and gas industry, which is nothing but extortion. The real problem is the state Department of Natural Resources. For the past twenty years they haven’t examined a single permit. They just rubber stamp them. When I’m elected governor, my first executive order will be to tell DNR to do its job!”

(Could Eddie Rispone possibly have been doing background research, and reading the Bayou Brief’s “Frack This” series?)

Next, candidates were asked about their stances regarding Louisiana’s criminal justice reforms, enacted in 2018.

“I advocated for the reforms, which were enacted by the Legislature in a bi-partisan manner,” Edwards said, proudly. “All the stakeholders came together. The District Attorneys’ Association supported it. The Sheriffs’ Association supported it. The voters supported it. It’s working as we hoped and expected.”

“It was a good attempt,” Rispone said, “Although the roll-out had problems. That’s because this administration is all about numbers, and many let out early were not prepared.”

“The roll-out was a disaster,” Abraham declared. “Violent criminals were released and have since raped and killed again. There should have been more concern about public safety!”

Ralph Abraham. Photo by Sue Lincoln.

Then the congressman looked at the governor and wagged his finger, saying, ”That’s misinformation about the lawsuit. It was because a subcontractor didn’t clean up, and it was settled without going to court.”

Gov. Edwards just smiled, and waved the lawsuit paperwork again.

The trio of men were asked about Common Core.

“I was always against it,” Abraham said. “I’m driven by data, and if Common Core worked, by now Louisiana should be number one, not number 48 or 49! This governor says education is his priority one, but only in this, an election year, did he come up with a pittance of additional money for teachers and education!”

“Only in Congress can you spend money you don’t have,” Gov. Edwards replied. “That’s the difference between the state and federal government. Here we have to balance the budget, and we have to work together to do that. We didn’t have the money till the Legislature fixed the budget. And the reality is, the Common Core debate is long over. We have set appropriate standards for Louisiana students, and now we must empower our teachers to teach.”

“I was always against the federal government takeover of our schools. Common Core, that was all Obama,” Rispone said, clearly hoping few would remember how heavily he supported Jindal, who was all-in for Common Core before he was against it.

Then Rispone turned to Abraham, and said, “Regarding your lawsuit, Congressman, that included ‘mental anguish’, because that’s what plaintiff attorneys and…” then he looked over at Gov. Edwards, “It’s what trial lawyers do.”

The candidates were asked what they would change about Louisiana’s constitution, and what other budget areas they would want to see opened up for cuts, rather than the current situation which protects nearly everything except health care and higher education.

“There are lots of constitutional dedications, because legislators thought they were good, and the people voted to do protect those funding streams,” Gov. Edwards explained. “The biggest share of state tax dollars is dedicated to K-12 education. Do we want to cut that? Of course not. What we have proven with my administration is that we didn’t need to make structural changes to our constitution. We just needed to tend to our business.”

“This administration started out with a deficit, it’s true,” Rispone said. “But now there’s a $700-million surplus. And that goes to show that threatening to kick old people out of nursing homes, and threatening LSU football doesn’t work!”

Eddie Rispone. Photo by Sue Lincoln.

(Sounds like it did work, actually.)

“What we need is an outsider with the courage to make a sea change, and call a constitutional convention so the legislators can do their jobs without having their hands tied!” Rispone continued.

“Louisiana’s constitution says higher education and health care are vulnerable, but with a conservative governor like me and a super-majority in the state House, we can fix that,” Abraham declared. “I’m not saying we should open up the entire constitution for revision, for if we did, we there is danger we could lose our careful protections for the unborn.”

Not really. Those are statutes, not constitutional amendments.

Or, as Gov. Edwards said a few times to his challengers, “You’re entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts. And facts are stubborn things.”

Kind of like the candidates, sticking to their talking points.

Governor Debate Review: Small Substance, Bigger Hissy-Fits

The trio of top-spending and top-polling candidates in the governor’s race met for their first televised debate Thursday evening, conducted at LSU’s Student Union Theatre. Gov. John Bel Edwards, the Democratic incumbent, was bracketed by Republicans, Congressman Ralph Abraham and businessman Eddie Rispone.

A poll conducted earlier in the week by JMC Analytics for Nexstar, the network of TV stations airing this debate, showed Edwards with 41%, Abraham with 24%, and Rispone with 16% support from likely voters. The other three men on the October 12 open primary ballot – Oscar “Omar” Dantzler, a Democrat from Hammond; Gary Landrieu, an Independent from New Orleans, and Patrick “Live Wire” Landry, a Republican from New Orleans – polled just four percent combined, and were not invited to participate.

Beginning with the first question, regarding whether any of them would consider issuing executive orders to halt sales of e-cigarette devices and fluids due to a recent spate of deaths linked to vaping, the debate – for the most part – could be classified as vapid. Much of that was due to the question topics, in addition to the overall format of the program. It had clearly been designed around the survey questions and results garnered by the JMC Analytics poll, for after candidates were asked their stance on certain issues, the moderators would give the poll results on that issue, and then ask if the volume of voter opinions changed the candidate’s stance in any way.

For example, all three men were asked about banning abortion, and whether – if the U.S. Supreme Court concurs – there should be exceptions for pregnancies arising out of rape or incest. Congressman Ralph Abraham, a physician by trade, said, “Life begins at conception, and the decision must be between the mother, the father, and their physician. A life is a life. I don’t support exceptions.”

“I believe the laws Louisiana has passed, including the most recent one, are good,” Eddie Rispone said, regarding the so-called “heartbeat law” that bans abortion once a fetal heartbeat can be detected. “I don’t think we should change that for any reason.”

Gov. John Bel Edwards

“I recognize there are differences of opinion on this issue, Gov. John Bel Edwards said, “But I am pro-life. Now, that’s not just ‘pro-birth’, because I support all the programs that help the children live their best life. Regarding rape or incest exceptions, that would only be if we are ordered to by the Court. Personally, I signed the bill that I support.”

The moderator for this question, news anchor Jacque Jovic from KTAL in Shreveport, followed with, “Our poll shows 40% of Louisiana residents support exceptions for rape or incest. Does this change your view in any way?”

Uniformly, they said no: the poll in no way changes things.

(News flash: 40% is not any kind of overwhelming majority. It’s no majority at all. Why on earth would anyone think that number might change the opinion of these men who will never have the experience of forced pregnancy?)

This sort of “but the people think this. Are you sure that’s your answer?” questioning, combined with direct answers limited to 60-seconds and rebuttal answers limited to 30-seconds, created a level of irritation for the candidates that ultimately led to their sniping at each other, and ultimately to raised voices and direct accusations of lying and falsehood.

As a longtime observer and many-time moderator of similar events, it seemed to me this debate format had its intended effects. The limited time frame for candidate responses – an hour-long “lightning round” in effect – while giving the impression of “quick and lively debate,” failed to elicit any in-depth policy answers, and served to keep the candidates frustrated and off-balance. That led to the inevitable displays of temper, which, while considered by some to be “good theatre,” do little to inform the voting public.

Stage at the LSU Union Theatre, just prior to introduction of candidates. Screen capture from broadcast.

The eruptions began with the question that followed the abortion issue inquiries, regarding Louisiana’s $14-billion backlog of needed road and bridge construction and repairs. The candidates were asked if they would support an increase in the state gasoline tax to pay for the infrastructure work?

“The problem is politicians, who just keep kicking the can down the road. We need a businessperson, like me, to go in and prioritize the projects and the available money, before we ask the people for more,” Rispone said, in his high-pitched, nasally voice, remarkably reminiscent of Ross Perot. “We need to improve the roads and bridges first, and show the people we can be responsible with the money they’ve already entrusted to the state. Instead, we always hear ‘we need more money.’ Well, not in my administration!”

“From the beginning of my administration, I made sure the Transportation Trust Fund was only spent on transportation projects,” Gov. Edwards said, clearly confident and comfortable with the topic. Yet his voice rose in pitch, signaling he was feeling some urgency to include complex content in his answer. “I supported the task force recommendations in 2017 for an increase in the gasoline tax to better fund the needed work. Thirty years ago, the people agreed toa 16-cent per gallon tax on gasoline. It’s the same amount today. And you can’t do anything the same today with the same amount of money you had 30 years ago. It will be difficult to pass, but in the meantime we’re working on innovative ways to fund projects, like those we’re doing with GARVEE bonds.”

The dinging bell, showing his allotted minute had expired, interrupted the Governor’s last sentence, but Congressman Abraham used Edwards’ statement to launch his answer and attack.

“GARVEE bonds are simply robbing Peter to pay Paul, and DOTD is out of control,” Abraham said. “However, if a gasoline tax has to be passed by the Legislature, I guarantee it will be tax neutral. If we raise one tax up, we will take another tax down.”

“Our poll shows 47% support for an increase in the gasoline tax,” the male moderator from WVLA in Baton Rouge pronounced. “Does that change your stance?”

“No,” Rispone replied. “It confirms my stance. We’re spending $130-million of our current gasoline tax on bureaucrats’ salaries. Te state has not done what it said it would do with that tax.”

“The poll doesn’t change my opinion,” Gov. Edwards responded. Then turning to Abraham, he said, “And GARVEE bonds are an essential part of our overall…”

Abraham interrupted, “That’s not so…”

And the moderator assured the congressman, “You’ll have your chance. It’s the Governor’s turn now.”

But Edwards’ 30-second rebuttal time had expired, and so Abraham cackled, “More taxes, taxes, taxes – that’s all we hear from this governor! I will sign a higher gas tax into law if needed, but only if another tax is taken away.”

The next question addressed Medicaid expansion, and the hackneyed GOP accusations of “waste, fraud, and abuse” within the program. Gov. Edwards went first this round, and was asked if he stood by his teams’ work with Medicaid.

“Absolutely,” he replied, smiling. “Expanding Medicaid was the easiest big decision I made. We saved the state $317-million with the Medicaid expansion. More importantly, it is saving people’s lives!”

Ralph Abraham

Abraham, whose congressional voting record reflects seven votes to repeal all or part of the Affordable Care Act (the parent law of Medicaid expansion), cocked his verbal first at the governor.

“Look, I’m a family doctor. He’s a trial lawyer. There is waste, fraud, and abuse all through the program,” Abraham said. “More than that, it’s second-rate insurance, and Louisiana citizens deserve better, because they are first-rate people!”

Pointing to his right, where the governor stood behind his own lectern at center stage, the northeast Louisiana congressman continued, “This governor just eliminated one of our MCOs because they supported a Republican candidate!”

This was a reference to one of the five managed care organizations (MCOs) handling insurance for Louisiana Medicaid patients being advised in April that their contract was not being renewed. Louisiana Healthcare Connections has filed a protest, and now an organization going by the name of “Caring Health Solutions” has been putting out digital ads and billboards urging voters to contact Gov. Edwards and bitch about it.

“That is ridiculous and false!” the governor interrupted Abraham’s statement. “The MCO gives to both sides. The decision was made before any campaign finance reports showed the company contributions, so that is one-hundred percent false!”

“That’s a lie!” Abraham fired back.

Eddie Rispone

“It’s fun to watch the career politicians go after each other, isn’t it?” the 70-year-old Rispone asked rhetorically, with a puckish grin. “I’m just a businessperson, and as such, I see that what we have now with Medicaid is unsustainable. If we continue, we’re going to go broke. We need to get good jobs here so our people don’t need to be on government assistance.”

That led, conveniently, to the follow-up question: “Do you support work requirements for Medicaid?”

“I support community engagement initiatives, like that proposed by Republican state Rep. Frank Hoffman.,” Gov. Edwards answered. “His bill didn’t pass, but it prompted a pilot project in his home area – and yours, Congressman – in Monroe.”

The governor continued, “I also support work requirements for members of Congress, and clearly, this gentleman doesn’t do it.”

Earlier in the debate, when each candidate was asked an individually tailored question, Abraham had been grilled about his worst-in-Congress voting record, missing 44% of all votes in Washington, D.C., while he was in state, campaigning for governor, instead.

“Tell people to look at your record in the Legislature when you ran for governor before!” Abraham verbally lashed back.

“I didn’t miss a single day!” Edwards replied, proudly.

“I doubt that,” Abraham grumbled.

“Am I going to get a chance to answer?” Rispone asked, plaintively, “Or are y’all having too much fun watching them?”

That prompted somewhat embarrassed apologies from the moderators, who – while relishing the ripostes between Edwards and Abraham – had obviously forgotten the shortest candidate behind the lectern at the far left of the stage.

“I’m a businessman,” Rispone continued, returning to singing his single-note serenade. “Put everyone to work and they will get off Medicaid. Help them get a better job and they can pay their own way.”

The trio of men were asked about their views on President Trump.

“I’m the only one on stage that has voted with the president,” Abraham stated. “I voted with him for the greatly successful National Tax Cut and Jobs Act. Of course, its effects haven’t trickled all the way down to Louisiana because of the economy-dampening effects of trial lawyers.”

“I’m the only one on stage that has always supported Trump, unlike Congressman Abraham, here, who advised him to step aside,” Rispone claimed. Trump’s success shows what happens when a non-politician, an outsider, a businessman takes the reins. I’m like him – not beholden to special interests.”

“As governor, my job is to put Louisiana first, as I have said all along,” Edwards remarked. “And part of that is having a great working relationship with the President, no matter who he or she may be. I’ve worked with two Presidents, including Obama in my first year. The past three years, I’ve met with President Trump nine times.”

In closing statements, Eddie Rispone observed that this debate was – for them as candidates – the equivalent of a job interview.

“Just remember when you make your choice: our state has the slowest economy in the nation, and is the only state that is losing jobs,” Rsipone said, gloomily.

Gov. John Bel Edwards used the time to enumerate his accomplishments, and how they have benefited the people, attempting to end on a positive note.

He said, “When I walked into office, I found a $2-billion deficit left by my predecessor, Bobby Jindal. Now we are showing surpluses, because we have put what Louisiana needs ahead of what political parties want.”

Abraham had no compunction about ending sourly.

“That’s all this governor does, is blame, blame, blame,” the 65-year-old physician from Louisiana’s poorest region complained. “Instead, imagine a Louisiana where everyone has a good high-paying job. That’s what you’ll have with me as governor.”

Based on reaction as the broadcast ended, the theatre audience was far from convinced by either of the two Republicans. The moderators, expressing thanks and signing off, could barely be heard about the audience chanting – in support of John Bel Edwards – “Four more years! Four more years!”

A nice sentiment, but only an option if we, the voters, are able to survive two more televised debates – on Sept. 26, and October 9 – and three more weeks of this insubstantial bickering.

Of Surrealists & Sheriffs

Last time, I introduced myself and explained the column name: 13th Ward Rambler. Given that I ramble at times, it’s almost self-explanatory but I digress. It’s what I do.

This time around I’d like to dish about the featured image. It’s a collage by Max Ernst, Birdmen. It comes from his 1934 surrealistic novel, Une Semaine de Bonte. It’s been modified for our purposes by my publisher. That’s a fancy way of saying we put some lettering over the image when this column took bi-weekly flight. It has nothing to do with the 2013 Oscar winning movie Birdman, which should have lost for Best Picture to Boyhood.

I’ve been using Ernst’s art to illustrate my posts at First Draft for years. I’m preternaturally fond of Surrealist art and Ernst was one of the mainstays of that artistic movement. He was also one of the founders of the movement whose motto should have been, in Tom Stoppard’s memorable phrase, “My art belongs to Dada.”

Max Ernst was a genuinely international figure. He was born in Germany in 1891, worked in Paris for many years, and fled France before the Nazis came knocking on his door. They were not fond of so-called degenerate artists such as Max Ernst. 

Ernst spent 18 years in the United States spreading the Surrealistic “gospel” before returning to France where he died in 1976. He held dual French and American citizenship but was really a citizen of the world; a concept that Donald Trump, Boris Johnson, and other right-wing populists are working to expunge.

That’s probably more than you wanted or needed to know about Max Ernst, but the column title entitles me to ramble.

I’d written 85% of this column when I heard tragic news about some old friends. If you follow me on Twitter, I’ve talked about it there at some length. I wanted to flesh out my thoughts and share them with you here. I’m not usually a sentimentalist but this has brought out my softer side.

A Death In The Extended Family: 

I’ve written extensively about what I call The Spirit Of ’05. There’s a special camaraderie among those of us who went through Katrina, the Federal Flood and its aftermath together. Lamar has written about the special ties among the post-K New Orleans blogging community. I formed many friendships then: some ephemeral, others enduring. Something terrible has happened to the family of one of them: Michael Homan.

I captured the essence of our odd but strong friendship in a Tweet so why not repeat it?

Over the years, my wife Grace and I also became friends with Michael’s charming and brilliant wife, Therese Fitzpatrick who teaches at Lusher. They’re both educators: Michael is a theology professor at Xavier. I’ve known them and their beautiful family for 13 years. Something horrible happened to them this week.

I’ve known Gilgamesh Homan since he was 5 or 6 years old. He was in a fatal skateboard accident in Baton Rouge where he was attending LSU. He was 18 years old. It’s been a long goodbye for the Homans since Gil was an organ donor and on life support until his organs could be harvested. But it’s the only good that can come of this tragic accident.

Gil’s sudden passing has devastated the Homan-Fitzpatrick family and stunned their many friends. There’s something extra awful about the death of someone you saw grow up.

Gil was a sweet and smart young man who was liked by everyone he met. I can’t say that I knew the teenage Gil all that well: like most kids that age he wanted to be with his peers, not his mom and dad’s friends. I’m just sorry that none of us will get to know the adult Gil who was bound to be as interesting a person as his parents and older sister, Kalypso.

My heartfelt condolences to Mike, Therese, and Kalypso. All your friends can do is to tell you that we care and are here for you. Always.

We return to our regularly scheduled programming with a look at the Sheriff’s race next door in Jefferson Parish.

Jefferson Parish Grudge Rematch: 

NOLA transplants are often baffled by the local media’s focus on the ins and outs of the Jefferson Parish Sheriff’s Office; hereinafter JPSO. It’s a very important job both in law enforcement terms and politically: the Sheriff is often a bigger deal than the parish president. Besides, the office was held for nearly four decades by two larger than life figures: Harry Lee, and his protege, Newell Normand. Lee was notorious for his strident racially charged comments and Normand was such a colorful character that he retired as Sheriff in 2017 to become a talk radio big mouth at WWL-AM.

The special election in 2017 between Joe Lopinto and John Fortunato was a barn burner; not that there are many barns in Metry or elsewhere in largely suburban JP. Fortunato was better known because he had been the department’s spokesman for many years but Lopinto was appointed by Normand to succeed him, so he had the advantage of semi-incumbency.

Fortunato made a mistake during a candidate’s forum that doomed his bid. He said that he’d support pariah parish President Mike Yenni for re-election. Yenni is best known for sexting a 17-year-old boy and a recall effort by voters He remained so unpopular in JP that he isn’t running for re-election. Bad move, Johnny.

Fortunato was not expected to run again but then something big happened. I’ll let Clancy DuBos do the heavy lifting since he broke the story:

“Fortunato, meanwhile, had given no public hints of another run for the sheriff’s job. Then, only minutes before qualifying ended, he joined the race. Up to that point, Lopinto appeared poised to coast back into office — his only other opponent being Anthony Bloise, a retired shipbuilder who ran for sheriff twice before.

Then Lopinto dropped a bombshell. He called me 20 minutes after qualifying closed and said he had called the FBI and the state Attorney General’s office several hours before Fortunato qualified to report that “several people” had reached out to him, allegedly on Fortunato’s behalf, to say his former adversary would not run against him if the sheriff would help Fortunato land a job as chief of the Causeway Police, an appointed position which is currently vacant. Lopinto, an attorney, said he was concerned the offers, if coming from Fortunato, violated bribery and other laws.”

I, for one, am dubious of Lopinto’s story. Fortunato has repeatedly denied it. Additionally,nobody from the Causeway Commission seems to know anything about his supposed desire to be its police chief. Besides, if something like this call happened, it sounds like political deal making to me: clumsy but unlikely to be a bribe. It’s pretty tame stuff by Gret Stet standards but it set the stage for an entertaining campaign.

There was an interesting piece by Christopher Tidmore at Louisiana Weekly wherein he takes a close look at the impact of Fortunato’s candidacy on the parish president’s race:

“That is not to say that John Fortunato’s choice to seek a second bid against the incumbent Jefferson Sheriff will not drive the Caucasian electorate to the voting booths as well. If recent history proves any guide, their rematch may trigger an exciting and closely matched contest. One in which it hardly takes a leap of logic to conclude that many of Fortunato’s supporters will tend to lean more towards supporting Young than casting a ballot in favor of Lopinto’s close ally Lee-Sheng. They often share the same anti-establishment vote. As one campaign insider put it to this newspaper, “There’s no doubt that Johnny getting into the Sheriff’s race helps John.”

Moreover, Lee-Sheng and Lopinto do run on a defacto ticket, making it rather easy for their opponents to make their anti-establishment case in a way that would usually be denied to a former parish president and retired JPSO Colonel. It is far from uncommon to see Lopinto’s sign crews putting up placards for both the current sheriff and the daughter of the past sheriff. While the councilwoman and the JPSO chief each runs his or her own race, the strong coordination by the campaigns of the two candidates links them in the public consciousness. Lopinto is the hand-picked successor of Newell Normand, after all, who also first encouraged the daughter of his mentor to run for the parish council and served as her campaign manager whilst still sheriff himself.

I realize that was inside Jefferson Parish baseball but it’s pretty darn interesting. Tidmore believes that black voters will decide the race and that those with long memories are not bloody likely to cast a nostalgic vote for Harry Lee’s daughter. Lee was NOT popular in the African American community because he often made inflammatory statements about black folks. In short, many believe that the Chinese American sheriff/folk hero was a racist. I think the truth is more complicated than that BUT Harry loved the limelight, lived to be on teevee, and was prone to shoot from the lip.

John Fortunato is a decided underdog in the grudge rematch. The incumbent has most of the resources and endorsements. It’s unclear if John Young’s coattails are strong enough to benefit Fortunato’s candidacy. His surname increasingly appears to be a misnomer.

Back to John Fortunato’s days as JPSO spokesman. He was instrumental in the decision to allow action star Steven Seagal to film his reality show, Lawman, in Jefferson Parish. Fortunato was a recurring character in that A&E potboiler and can be seen at the wheel in this trailer as Seagal drags his ponytail about JP:

The bonds between Segal and the JPSO were severed permanently after the second season of Lawman over allegations of sexual misconduct. Seagal filmed one more season in Phoenix, Arizona under the auspices of notorious wingnut Sheriff Joe Arpaio. There’s no ambiguity about the former Maricopa County sheriff, he’s a flat-out racist.

Seagal has joined the lunatic fringe and become an apologist for Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump. Perhaps Fortunato should throw the political equivalent of a Hail Mary pass and run an ad featuring his old pal, Seagal. Probably not: sexual misconduct is frowned upon even in conservative Jefferson Parish. Just ask lame duck parish president Mike Yenni.

Let’s lighten things up in our final segment. It was inspired by this tweet:

An excellent question, which brings us to our final segment. It’s a feature that’s stolen from my weekly Saturday Odds & Sods post at First Draft, which in turn was stolen from Spy Magazine. That’s a whole lot of thieving but it’s in a good cause. I guess that makes me the Robin Hood of pundits with one exception: I’d look shitty in green tights.

Gret Stet Separated At Birth: 

The 2019 Louisiana Governor’s race is a rather dull affair, especially compared to 2015, which resulted in the political death of David Vitter. The two “major” Republicans candidates seem to be running on the notion that, since this is a red state, GOPers are entitled to the Governorship. It doesn’t work that way, y’all.

Our esteemed publisher has done a helluva job taking on Ralph Abraham so I’ll turn my attention to Eddie Rispone. Gumbopac calls him Phony Rispone and I call him Major Donor Rispone who before his teevee ad blitz was best known for giving money to Republican candidates. His pockets are deeper than his thoughts.

That was a lot of exposition for a sight gag, wasn’t it? Here’s Rispone and cranky fictional old man, Cotton Hill of King of the Hill fame:

Note the defiant glare, the shock of white hair. Plus, Cotton is every bit as right wing as Eddie. It’s a helluva good name for a Gret Stet politico as well: Cotton Hill sounds like a State Senator from Bunkie circa 1955. It’s easy to imagine him swilling Hadacol and swapping dirty jokes with Dudley LeBlanc

For those of you unfamiliar with King of the Hill, it was a long-running cartoon comedy series on Fox. It was set in Arlen, Texas. The main character was Cotton’s propane selling, hyper-conventional son, Hank Hill. Hank was surrounded by zany characters among them his asshole father, Cotton Hill who was wont to brag that he killed “FITTY MEN” in World War II.

Rispone instead brags about being a Trump supporter. I’m sure Cotton would like the Insult Comedian too, but he’d run on his war record instead of stale attacks on trial lawyers. Gret Stet GOPers need some new material: I recall Mike Foster and Bobby Jindal going on about “billboard lawyers” as well.

That concludes this edition of 13th Ward Rambler. If anyone was offended by my comparing Eddie Rispone to a Toon, too bad. I could have added Doc Abraham: he resembles Cotton Hill too. No wonder Clancy called them, “Tweedledee and Tweedledum.”

The last word goes to the late Dr. John with a medley of the unofficial theme song of this columnand a venerable funeral dirge in honor of Gilgamesh Homan:

James Carville’s Stirring Tribute to Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Blanco

Late last month, I brought a small film crew up to Baton Rouge to record LSU Professor James Carville’s first class of the semester, part of a larger project we’re working on together and hope to announce in greater detail in the near future.

At the very end of his class (and for reasons that may or may not be made clear later on), James asked students to stand and listen to a recording of “Amazing Grace.” But before he called class to a close, he had a final message for his new class, which is entirely comprised of juniors and seniors at the Manship School for Mass Communications: This year’s class would be dedicated to the late Gov. Kathleen Blanco, who he had previously told the Bayou Brief was “the most underrated one-term governor in American history.”

Fortunately, our cameras were still rolling, so with James’ permission, we decided to turn this into a standalone clip, which we first shared on social media a week ago.

Watch the man known as the Ragin Cajun explain his deep admiration for Blanco and why he decided to dedicate this year’s class to her:

Lamar White, Jr.: Producer

Ben Collinsworth: Producer

Tim Connor: Sound

Sue Lincoln: Associate Producer

The Beginning of Hell

The entrance to the Forgotten City is marked by a road sign at the intersection of Louisiana Highways 165 and 112, sixteen miles south of Alexandria. Be careful as you cross through Woodworth. The town makes most of its annual revenue by doling out speeding tickets, under the regime of Police Chief James “Speedy” Gonzales. If you make it to Forest Hill, the self-proclaimed nursery capital of Louisiana, turn around; you’ve gone too far.

Depending on whom you ask, before it was effectively abandoned in 1946, it had either been Louisiana’s third or fourth-most populated city, though it wasn’t ever a real city. The temporary settlement, which had been home to a grand total more than 500,000 people over the course of its seven years, was a military training facility. No one stayed long.

In 1940, 8,000 construction workers began moving into Central Louisiana, building the entire place in less than a year. They paved miles and miles of new roads, installed underground sewerage systems, and laid gas and electricity lines. There were restaurants and barbershops and laundromats. Property values skyrocketed as a result.

Named after W.C.C. Claiborne, the state’s first governor, Camp Claiborne was once a sprawling boomtown, hastily built and then quickly forgotten by the U.S. government, part of the Louisiana Maneuvers. George Marshall, Omar Bradley, George Patton, and Dwight D. Eisenhower all spent time at the camp, though it is unclear whether any of them knew a kid from Fürth, Germany who trained there named Henry Kissinger or a 23-year-old Black kid from Pasadena who seemed to be a natural athlete.

His name was Jackie Robinson.

Camp Claiborne, like many things in Louisiana, is buried above ground. Today, you can still find the bones of its sports arena, hollowed-out water tanks, the foundation of the bank, and the old officers club, next to its emptied-out swimming pool.

An example of what remains at Camp Claiborne.

When I was a high school student, more than 50 years after the camp’s closure, kids would drive out to Claiborne to drink beer and smoke pot. There were fantastical rumors that devil-worshippers used part of the grounds for their ceremonies.

The police never patrolled out there; they couldn’t.

Camp Claiborne had been scrubbed from the map.

The places we choose to forget often contain stories we would rather not tell.

Aerial of Camp Claiborne in 1943.

“Hell begins after you leave camp in the South to travel,” a Black veteran told Elbert J. Harris in 1948. Harris, who taught history at Livingstone College in North Carolina, recalled the man’s haunting words in an essay for the Negro History Bulletin; he titled the essay, facetiously, “Southern Hospitality.”

Harris had heard a harrowing story about what Black soldiers stationed at Camp Claiborne experienced during a Saturday night in nearby Alexandria in January of 1942, barely a month after the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor.

There were four major military training camps within fifty miles of Alexandria, and the influx of soldiers stretched the local police force thin. On so-called “Liberty Weekends,” when thousands of soldiers would receive permits and buy bus passes into town, the cops often depended on the military to police themselves.

It was far easier for White soldiers to enjoy Liberty Weekends than it was for Black soldiers. Not only were Blacks forced to take an entirely different bus line, they were housed in remote corners of the camps, making it more difficult to leave. This was particularly true for Black soldiers training at Camp Claiborne.

As one scholar noted, Blacks lived so far away from the main facilities it seemed to have “no physical connection” at all with the camp itself. In order to catch the bus, a Black soldier had to walk five miles to get to the closest station.

Bus ticket from Alexandria to Camp Claiborne.

There were several reasons the federal government selected Central Louisiana as the staging grounds for the largest-ever military exercise in the nation’s history: The region’s mild climate meant training could be year-round; the area had been used before, during WWI, and it helped that the newly-established Kisatchie National Forest meant the federal government already owned a ton of land. But there was another factor, and the federal government didn’t make it much of a secret: Locals, they believed, wouldn’t complain about the inconvenience. Southerners were known as gracious hosts, after all.

But this was still the Deep South during the Jim Crow Era. That was an inescapable reality. Months before the violence erupted in Alexandria, the small town of Glenmora had already been declared “off limits” for Black soldiers training at Camp Claiborne. While the federal government prepared young men to fight across both the Atlantic and the Pacific Oceans, for many Black soldiers, hell began as soon as they wandered off-base.

A century before it hosted the Louisiana Maneuvers, 69% of the population of Rapides Parish were enslaved African Americans. It was where Solomon Northup spent ten of his twelve years in captivity. For a time, the parish’s largest slave owner had been Meredith Calhoun, the man who allegedly inspired the notorious character Simon Legree in Harriet Beecher Stowe’s “Uncle Tom’s Cabin.” According to the 1860 Census, there were more slaves in Rapides Parish than in any other parish in the state. Perhaps not surprisingly, it was also home to more landholders.

Downtown Alexandria, Louisiana shortly before the Civil War.

The Civil War altered Rapides Parish forever. Alexandria was burned to the ground by the Union, and emancipation upturned the region’s economy, which had been largely dependent on slave labor and the slave trade. Reconstruction shortly gave way to an era of resentment and retribution, stunting growth and ensuring wealth remained concentrated in the hands of a small handful of White families. In 1940, Alexandria had a population of more than 27,000 people, and although nearly half were African American, there were only 17 Black registered voters in the entire city.

In the 55 years between Reconstruction and the Second World War, time may have moved, but in Central Louisiana, almost everything else remained still. The primary difference was that in 1942, unlike 1877, the region’s White establishment welcomed the federal government.

There were few places in the country that would have looked the other way like Alexandria had in the aftermath of the night of Saturday, Jan. 10th, 1942, when a white military police officer incited a riot that allegedly resulted in at least 10 and as many as 15 Black soldiers killed and dozens more injured outside of a movie theater in the middle of downtown, on a street named in honor of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee.

Today, outside of Central Louisiana, what transpired that night in Alexandria, in a part of town that was called “Little Harlem,” has been either completely forgotten or entirely misremembered. For the past thirteen years, every Memorial Day, members of the city’s chapter of the Buffalo Soldiers Motorcycle Club, one of the largest black biker organizations in the country, place a wreath in honor of the men who lost their lives on Lee Street.

However, in recent years, the commemoration has featured a temporary sign with an incorrect date (off by two full years) and the assertion that 200 people had been killed, a number so wildly exaggerated that it undermines the credibility of scholars and journalists who have spent decades working to reveal the historical truth.

But their error pales in comparison to the government’s.

The Baltimore Afro American, 01/24/1942

“I don’t know how I got to safety after the riot,” a Black trainee at Camp Claiborne recalled. “I only know one thing and that is, whenever anybody says, ‘Remember Pearl Harbor,’ I will say, ‘I will remember Lee Street.'”

While there is now no question whatsoever that black soldiers from Camp Claiborne were among the primary victims of what was quickly dubbed the “Lee Street Riot,” Col. Ralph Holiday, a commander at the camp, had initially claimed that none of “our boys participated in the unfortunate outbreak.” It was a part of a pattern of denials, obfuscation, and brazen lies that would be repeated countless times by the military’s brass, one that the pliant and obsequious local paper, the Alexandria Daily Town Talk, was more than willing to report as fact.

Black soldiers training at Camp Claiborne.

In one of its first reports about “the unfortunate outbreak,” the Town Talk even boasted about how pleased the military was with the paper. Despite the scores of contradictory eyewitness accounts and widespread rumors that morticians and funeral parlors with government contracts had been called to work throughout the late night and early morning, the Town Talk reported the official line: Zero deaths, 28 injured, including a White state trooper who “suffered a badly injured hand in wielding a flashlight over the head of a negro.”

The Town Talk urged its readers not to believe “the worst,” arguing that, although the military had been reluctant to even acknowledge the riots and needed to issue a more definitive report, there was still no reason to doubt the official line.

This much is known: The rioting started at around 8PM, after a white M.P. allegedly fired his gun at a Black soldier leaving the Ritz Theater, attempting to arrest the man for disorderly conduct. (There were subsequent reports the soldier had been accused of assaulting a White woman, though those reports seem to be based on pure speculation. Notably, it was generally acknowledged, even- implicitly- by the government, that the soldier had not been responsible for provoking the violence).

African American soldiers enjoying the nightlife on Lee Street in 1941.

By most accounts, between 2,000 and 3,000 people, the overwhelming majority of whom were African American, had been present that night on Lee Street, and almost immediately after the first shot was fired, Black soldiers began protesting. The soldiers were all unarmed; the military police and state troopers, however, had an arsenal at their disposal. For nearly two hours, 90 White officers were called to respond, and according to witnesses, including a handful of local police and state troopers, some of those 90 men attempted to quell the unrest by shooting indiscriminately at Black soldiers and civilians- men, women, and teenage children. (60 of the 90 men who responded were military police officers who had been stationed at nearby training camps).

Republished for educational, informational, and non-commercials uses.

The most serious and compelling scholarship on the subject of the Lee Street Riot was by Dr. Bill Simpson, a former history professor at Louisiana College. Simpson spent several years interviewing witnesses and researching the event, widely believed to be the most significant “race riot” during WWII, and when he published his findings in 1994 in an essay titled “A Tale Untold? The Alexandria, Louisiana Lee Street Riot,” it generated renewed (albeit temporary) local interest in the subject.

For those familiar with my previous reporting about Louisiana College, I should note that Bill Simpson worked at LC before its credibility as an academic institution was effectively destroyed in the aftermath of a hostile takeover by a fringe group of disreputable, corrupt, and anti-intellectual bigots. To his enormous credit, Simpson was one of a small number of respected academics who fought, unsuccessfully, to save the school.

In the wake of Simpson’s scholarship, even the Town Talk had been forced to publicly acknowledge its own complicity in manufacturing what now was clearly revealed to be an egregious cover-up. Simpson estimates that between 10 to 15 Black soldiers were killed, a number that is supported by the accounts of several notable witnesses.

Among others, Simpson spoke with David Iles, the longtime principal of Peabody High School who had been injured that night, and Louis Berry, a local civil rights pioneer and the first Black attorney admitted to the local bar association. (Berry was “introduced” to the bar by another well-known legal giant, Camille Gravel, and today, the city’s municipal court building is named in honor of both men).

Iles and Berry were certain that lives were lost; it was impossible to reach any other conclusion after observing the carnage. It was a nightmare, total hell.

The front page of the Alexandria Daily Town Talk, 01/12/1942

Simpson also spoke with one of my distant cousins, State Trooper Charner Lyles, who revealed, somewhat reluctantly, he had seen at least one dead man on the street that night, which was 100% more than the government acknowledged.

Like other Black-owned newspapers at the time, the Afro-American, a paper based in Baltimore, was immediately skeptical of the government’s version. They sent Ralph Williams, an award-winning correspondent, to Central Louisiana.

Williams filed a report alleging the riot had been premeditated and that there were vastly more fatalities than the zero the military had claimed. While there is scant evidence of premeditation or planning, his initial reporting on deaths was later corroborated, at least in part, by White officers themselves.

The four-block area had been hastily cordoned off, and the military commanded Black soldiers to return to their respective bases, either Livington or Claiborne. And just as they’d been ordered to stay away from Glenmora, Black soldiers were told that Alexandria was also now “off-limits.”

We may never know the full and complete story of what transpired on Lee Street.

The majority of the Black soldiers who were present were from Michigan and Indiana, a detail that the Town Talk emphasized several times in a brazen attempt to assign blame to “outside agitators” and to deflect the city’s own culpability. Today, most of those soldiers and most of the civilians who witnessed the pandemonium are dead; records are missing or were destroyed. The camp, of course, is a ghost town.

There is one bit of folklore that continues to persist: the story of what a small group of Black soldiers had attempted to do once they returned to base.

As legend has it, someone got the bright (and likely drunken) idea to hijack a tank and drive it into town. They were apprehended before they got anywhere, and the army ordered the unit’s swift transfer to a camp in Texas the very next day.

Lee Street would never again be the same kind of bustling commercial corridor it had been. The Ritz Theater was demolished in the late 1970s, as were several other buildings.

Today, Lee Street is a pastiche of empty lots and neglected buildings, with very few prospects for revitalization.

In 2003, in preparation for the city museum’s “Heart of Spain” exhibit, three local artists painted a mural on the side of a vacant building on Lee, directly across the street from the since-demolished Ritz Theater; the mural had honored prominent African Americans in Central Louisiana’s history, including David Iles and Louis Berry.

Demolished in 2015, this mural celebrating African American history in Central Louisiana had been located directly across the street from the Ritz Theater.

Twelve years later, after a White businessman, Oday Lavergne, purchased the majority of the Lee Street corridor, the mural was taken down, though not before Lavergne and an African American consultant named Von Jennings vowed to preserve its “message.”

“We’re very excited about it. I truly don’t believe this is a loss,” Jennings told the Town Talk.

It was a loss, though, and whatever grand plans there may have once been for the area have not yet materialized. It had been the most significant work of public art honoring African Americans in the city. Today, it exists only on a website Lavergne’s company, Kinetix, built for the organization that had commissioned the mural.

Lee Street today, northbound, terminating at the Red River. On the left, highlighted in blue, is the site of the former Ritz Theater, the epicenter of the riot in 1942. On the right, highlighted in red is the site of the mural honoring African-American history, which was demolished in 2015 and replaced with a website.

It is unclear why there had been such a sense of urgency to remove instead of restore the mural, but regardless, it echoes what one discovers at Camp Claiborne.

The places we choose to forget often contain stories we would rather not tell.

Lien on Me

“When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.” – Frédéric Bastiat

There’s less than a month till the statewide primary elections on October 12, and the field at the top of the ticket has narrowed. Three of the nine men who signed up August 6-8 to run for Louisiana Governor were disqualified by a court decision handed down August 26. Republicans Patrick Doguet and Manuel Leach, along with Democrat “Vinny” Mendoza, will not appear on the ballot due to failure to “file income tax returns for each of the past five years.”

And while he’s not a candidate for elected office, it was announced Thursday, September 12, that the not-so-behind-the-scenes player in politics, Lane Grigsby, is being sued by the federal Department of Justice for more than three-quarters of a million dollars (+ $750,000). The Cajun Industries founder and his wife claimed and received a tax refund for “research and development expenses” incurred by the company, a refund the IRS has since disallowed. A longtime Republican powerhouse within the Louisiana Association of Business and Industry (LABI) Board of Directors, Grigsby had made one political gossip column the previous week, when it was revealed he and his family are financially supporting the state Senate campaign of Cleo Fields. Fields, who is notorious for being shown purportedly accepting a large amount of cash from Edwin Edwards in an FBI video used in the last federal court case against the former governor, is a Democrat who has not held an elected position for the past 12 years. The competitor in that state Senate race is also a Democrat, state Rep. Patricia Smith. She, on the other hand, has been vocal about her opposition to some of Grigsby’s and Rispone’s Erector Set shenanigans – most especially their involvement in the so-called “education reforms” of 2012.

All of this got us thinking – as much as Republican gubernatorial candidate Eddie Rispone bellyaches about “liberal John Bel Edwards’ disastrous tax hikes,” Rispone always pays all the taxes he owes when they’re due, doesn’t he?

Of course he doesn’t.

Glorifying Tax Avoidance

Nobody likes paying taxes, including Rispone, a Baton Rouge-based construction industry executive and engineer who, as we have previously reported, helped engineer a way to potentially minimize his state income tax liability via the school voucher scheme. In the meantime, much of his campaign scheme focuses on blaming the Democratic incumbent Gov. John Bel Edwards for the tax policies enacted by the state’s Republican majority Legislature.

If you google “tax avoidance strategies,” you’ll get more than 8 million responses. “Tax avoidance methods” returns more than 10 million links, including the first one which states, “Tax avoidance is the use of perfectly legal methodsof minimizing your income taxliability.”

Perfectly legal. Minimizing your income tax. Good, right?

As British economist John Maynard Keynes put it,

But another Google link, to a book titled “The Glorification of Plunder: State, Power and Tax Policy” by Malcolm James, defines “tax avoidance” as “contriving transactions and structures that reduce tax in ways that are contrary to the policy or spirit of the legislation.” James goes on to clarify that there are two parts to this: one, a taxpayer must undertake transactions or create structures which have the result of reducing their tax liabilities; and two, these must comply with the strict letter of the law but contravene its intention or spirit.

There is a difference between “tax avoidance” and “tax evasion”: the first is technically legal, while the second one is a crime. Somewhere in between are tax liens that show up on the record of companies Eddie Rispone has headed and/or owns.

How many types of taxes have the now-candidate for governor and his businesses been caught not paying, and in how many places?

  • There’s workmen’s comp in Ohio,
  • And franchise taxes in Texas.
  • There were missing city sales and use taxes in Baton Rouge,
  • And a sheriff’s sale due to delinquent property taxes.
  • Also, while Rispone was president of a prior company,
  • The feds said Ed’s biz hadn’t paid the IRS.

Rispone, who is primarily using ten million dollars of his own money in his campaign for governor, is running on his adoration of and devotion to Donald Trump, as well as on his personal record as a “successful businessman.”

Let’s examine the tax lien portions of that record.

In May 1987, a tax lien was filed against MMR Constructors, Inc., for $11,971.31 in unpaid 1986 federal taxes. Eddie Rispone was president of the company at the time.

As we have previously reported, Rispone’s tenure with MMR began in 1975 and ended in late 1998, followed by founding his current corporation, ISC Constructors, in early 1989. It certainly appears Rispone made sure to take care of the federal tax lien before leaving MMR, as the records show the lien was satisfied and released January 15, 1988.

Rispone was president of MMR Constructors, a wholly-owned subsidiary of MMR Holdings. He held the title of vice president with the parent company, and the timing of his escape from entanglements with MMR remains remarkably convenient.

Consider: from April through July of 1988, Rispone sold off some 27,000 shares of MMR stock. He says he did so upon the advice of his great friend Lane Grigsby, the CEO of Cajun Contractors., and used the funds to found ISC in early 1989.

Big Cajun 2 power plant. Photo courtesy: LEAN (Louisiana Environmental Action Now)

However, in November 1988, MMR Holdings and its president James Rutland were indicted in federal court for alleged bid-rigging of the 1981 Cajun Electric power plant contract. Rutland and MMR were convicted; MMR Holdings went into bankruptcy; and the stock, which Rispone had sold for an average price of $15.75 per share in spring and summer 1988, was valued at less than 19 cents per share by the end of 1990. And, according to SEC filings, “As of February 1, 1991, there were 5,677,417 shares of common stock outstanding. There is no current market for the common stock.”

One might reasonably excuse Eddie from the taint of responsibility for the criminal activity by MMR, as he was merely president of one of its subdivisions, and not the owner. Yet ISC Constructors, the company Eddie does own, has not been without its share of tax troubles here, there, and everywhere, starting a few years following its founding in early 1989.

In 1993, a Baton Rouge city/parish audit cited Rispone’s company for non-payment of sales and/or use tax, and on December 30, 1996, a $5500 lien was filed against “Industrial Specialty Contractors, Inc.,” as it was then called. The delinquent taxes were paid off and the lien lifted on July 15, 1997.

Since 2013, ISC, using the state-administered Enterprise Zone program, has been allowed an annual $6000-per-year credit against the sales and/or use taxes the company would otherwise owe to Baton Rouge city/parish government.

That’s because of “quality jobs” creation, you see. In the case of this particular Enterprise Zone program approval, it was five jobs, with a combined total five-year payroll of $292,500. Broken down, that means each of these “quality jobs” pays $11,700 annually. If that’s full-time, that means these workers are making $5.85 per hour – well below the $7.25 federal minimum that has been the law since July 2009.

We’ve previously reported on some the troubles Rispone’s company has had in Texas, including three major class-action lawsuits alleging violations of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act. Those lawsuits have been settled, and ISC continues to do projects in Texas, with business offices in Houston and Beaumont.

But in 2011, ISC got hit with a lien in Galveston County, Texas, for failure to pay Texas franchise tax. That tax is described on the state Comptroller’s website as “a privilege tax imposed on each taxable entity formed or organized in Texas or doing business in Texas.” It’s only assessed on big business, as it doesn’t kick in until gross receipts exceed a million dollars. Then the tax equals one percent of the gross receipts over $1,000,000. ISC’s lien was for $8,153.60.

To be fair, $8,153.42 of that was the penalty for failure to pay…the 18 cents actually owed in unpaid franchise tax. It was paid in full September 16, 2011.

Two years previously, Rispone’s ISC Constructors incurred not one, but two tax liens in Ohio – for failure to pay for Workmen’s Comp insurance coverage.

The first lien, for $939.15, was issued January 10, 2009. A second lien, for $5,056.06, was issued June 20, 2009, and were registered with the Clerk of Court for Franklin County, which includes Ohio’s capital city, Columbus. (That is like the process here in Louisiana, where proceedings involving state government have to be filed in state court in East Baton Rouge Parish, the jurisdiction of record for the state capital.)

Currently, Franklin County has no records of the liens being settled or released, showing that they have been referred to the Ohio Attorney General’s Office, which ISC must contact in order to resolve the lien.

It’s entirely possible Eddie Rispone and/or ISC Constructors’ accountants don’t even know about these Ohio liens.

According to information provided on-line by the Franklin County Law Library, “The existence of Ohio tax liens (also called judgment liens) can come as a surprise. Unless a taxpayer responds to the initial 60-day notice letter, informing him or her that taxes are past due, the Ohio Department of Taxation will contact the Attorney General’s Office, who will file a certification of the tax assessment with the Clerk of the Common Pleas Court, who will enter a judgment against the taxpayer.”

The website info goes on to say the Court does not collect the tax. It must be paid to the State of Ohio, through the Attorney General’s Office. And once the lien has been certified by the Ohio A.G. as satisfied, it’s up to the taxpayer to provide that certification proof to the Court, and then pay any additional court costs due there.

But, hey – altogether it’s less than $6000, and it’s in Ohio, not Louisiana. It’s against Rispone’s company, not Eddie himself. And the address they’ve got is a P.O. Box, not the physical street address.

However, in 2008, Rispone nearly lost the property at the actual physical street address of what is now his company headquarters.

ISC Headquarters, Baton Rouge. (Note “Rispone for Governor” sign at far right.)

On June 2, 2008, a sheriff’s tax sale was held to auction off the 5+ acres of property at 20480 Highland Road in Baton Rouge, due to delinquent property taxes in the amount of $25,195.72. On June 20, 2008, the East Baton Rouge Parish Clerk of Court filed a tax deed, transferring ownership of “the whole of the property…with all the improvements thereon” to R.E. Concepts, LLC, a company based in Metairie.

Title to the property, which had been owned by ISC since 1989, was returned to ISC Properties LLC via a deed of trust registered September 5, 2013.

It wasn’t cheap to get it back. The records show although the market value of the entire property – over 5 acres, more than 66-thousand square feet of office space, parking lots, etc. – was stated to be $2.6 million, ISC took out a mortgage for $6.75-million, at 18% interest.

If elected Louisiana Governor, what will Eddie Rispone’s “successful” business practices cost us?

Baton Rouge Police Officers Disciplined After Records Request Reveals Racist E-mails

Last month, after being notified that personal correspondence in the government email accounts of two current Baton Rouge police officers contained racial slurs, Chief Murphy Paul required they both attend diversity training, according to civil rights attorneys Thomas Frampton and William Most.

Frampton is currently a Lecturer of Law at Harvard Law School and had previously worked for the Orleans Parish Public Defenders Office. Most is the owner of a small public interest law firm in New Orleans and has quickly established himself as a prominent civil rights watchdog in a state in which there is never a short supply of work. During the past four years, he has been involved in several high-profile cases, including representing Glenn Ford in two civil cases following his release from Angola.

Front cover of Alton Sterling’s funeral program, which included eulogies from Rev. Al Sharpton and Rev. Jesse Jackson. Credit: Lamar White, Jr.

Although this particular records request was not related to any pending litigation, Most is currently representing thirteen activists and two journalists who allege the Baton Rouge Police Department violated their rights through a series of actions, including the use of excessive force, during public protests held in the aftermath of the shooting death of Alton Sterling.

“Baton Rouge, we are sorry,” Chief Paul said at a press conference in late July. “I want to apologize to the family of Alton Sterling and his family because (Blane Salamoni) (the officer who fatally wounded Sterling) never should have been hired. Although we obviously cannot change the past, it is clear we need to change the future.”

Earlier this year, in February, Chief Paul also issued a public apology after photographs from 1993 of two officers in blackface resurfaced; the officers apparently were participating in an undercover investigation, dressing in blackface in order to impersonate drug dealers in a majority-minority neighborhood. The story made national news, and the picture had first appeared in a police yearbook. As of February, both men were still employed by the police department.

Both sets of emails are from four and five years ago and had been otherwise either unknown or neglected by the department, which has been led by Chief Paul since March 2018. Paul had been unaware of the correspondence until Frampton and Most directed his attention to them in July.

“We appreciate and respect Chief Paul’s statement of how seriously he takes this issue,” Most said, “and we hope that this sparks a deeper investigation into Louisiana law enforcement.” 

Baton Rouge Chief of Police Murphy Paul

The Bayou Brief has agreed not to disclose the names of the two officers at the request of Frampton and Most, who provided copies of the documents with names and email addresses redacted. We can confirm, however, they are both white, and that racial slurs in the second set of emails were written by an officer formerly employed with the Denham Springs Police Department. The former officer does not and has never before worked for the Baton Rouge Police Department.

The Bayou Brief has not made any additional redactions and has elected to not to censor the offensive language at issue.

The first email was sent six days after Michael Brown of Ferguson, Missouri was killed by Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson, sparking a sustained protest that received international news coverage and amplified the nascent Black Lives Matter movement. The full context of the email exchange was not provided, but the Baton Rouge officer had been communicating with a Sergeant First Class in the US Army, presumably about missing out on a job opportunity.

Three weeks later, a different Baton Rouge police officer resigned from the force after a string of racist texts became public. Those texts specifically mentioned Michael Brown and the situation in Ferguson.

The second set of emails is an exchange between a former officer at the Denham Springs Police Department and an officer who remains with the Baton Rouge Police Department. While the Baton Rouge officer did not use any racial slurs, it appears there was no effort made to dispute the sender’s characterizations.

According to a press release from Frampton and Most, the two attorneys who requested these documents, Most decided to bring them to Chief Paul’s attention.

“Then-Chief Dabadie stated publicly that there was no need to determine the extent of similar attitudes among other BRPD officers, because the issue was confined to the lone officer,” the press release points out. “These emails suggest otherwise.”

In early August, Paul informed Most of the decision to send them to a course about “dehumanization” taught by Dr. Rhonda Tsoi-A-Fatt Bryant, an acclaimed African-American scholar and educator whose work primarily concentrates on policies that improve educational outcomes for minority children and youth living in economically distressed communities.

“We appreciate that the chief took this seriously, particularly that he selected a legitimate, rigorous course taught by an expert on the subject,” Most said.

Paul’s work on reconciliation has been widely praised in Baton Rouge, a city that was once at the epicenter of the struggle for civil rights. The very first bus boycott in the country occurred in Baton Rouge in 1953, two years before Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat and inspired a bus boycott, this time in Montgomery, which is widely considered to be the movement’s “seminal moment.”


Baton Rouge bus boycott 1953

Alton Sterling’s funeral services at Southern University in Baton Rouge, July 2017. Credit: Lamar White, Jr.

In recent years, Louisiana’s capital city, which remains largely segregated by race, has been beleaguered by a powerful but incompetent police union and a law enforcement culture that concentrates resources in majority black neighborhoods, resulting in massive inequities in the enforcement of low-level drug crimes, according to an analysis by the organization Together Baton Rouge.

Following the tragic death of Alton Sterling, whose final moments were captured by multiple cameras, thousands of people assembled for a series of peaceful protests. Many believe the police response was overly aggressive and disproportionate, rounding up dozens of protestors and journalists, including well-known Black Lives Matter advocate DeRay Mckesson. It was subsequently alleged that several arrest reports appear to have been filled out in advance.

Only two days after Sterling’s funeral, Gavin Eugene Long, a decorated former Marine and a self-identified “Black Separatist” who is believed to have suffered from PTSD, staged an ambush near the Hammond Aire Plaza on Airline Highway, killing three officers and wounding three others. The ambush re-traumatized an already fragile city. One of the wounded officers sued DeRay Mckesson and the Black Lives Matter movement.

Chief Paul inherited this, and thus far, he has proven himself to be a responsible and responsive leader. But the discovery of more racist content from officers currently on the force begs a series of uncomfortable questions about if there are still more documents that have yet to be disclosed and about whether these officers could have compromised any previous cases.

“The East Baton Rouge District Attorney should have a plan in place to notify criminal defendants and their attorneys,” said Frampton. “These sorts of emails call into question the credibility of the cases these officers have worked on.” 

A Bountiful Harvest

Before he ran for Congress, Ralph Abraham had already established himself as a statewide leader. According to data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, in 2013 (CMS), among the more than 700 family practice physicians in Louisiana, Abraham wrote more prescriptions and refills for opioids to patients covered by Medicare Part D than all but ten other doctors in the state.

All told, Abraham filed 1,856 opioid claims with CMS, nearly three times the population of the town in which he both practiced medicine and owned a pharmacy.

Interpreting the data

The data sheds additional light on the congressman and current gubernatorial candidate’s medical practice, though, importantly, it only includes patients who were enrolled under Medicare Part D. To be eligible for the government benefit, a person must be 65 or older or have a qualifying disability that already had provided them with 24 months of Social Security Disability Insurance.

During the past two weeks, the Bayou Brief has reported extensively on Rep. Abraham’s ownership interests in two rural pharmacies that ordered 1.5 million doses of opioids between 2006-2012, according to information recently made public by the Drug Enforcement Agency. Although our reporting has attracted national attention, no other major Louisiana news publication has covered the Republican candidate’s record as a physician and pharmacy owner in either prescribing or profiting from the dispensing of opioids.

Opioid Claims

This report is the first time any specific information about Abraham’s opioid prescriptions has been shared publicly. CMS began tracking opioid claims in 2013, which means it does not overlap with any of the data the Bayou Brief has previously reported. It also does not provide the names of pharmacies that filled prescriptions; indeed, CMS notes it cannot guarantee a prescription was actually filled, only that the prescribing physician claimed to have written one.

2013 Medicare Part D Provider Summary Data, ranked by opioid claims among Louisiana family practice doctors. Source: CMS.

All told, he prescribed opioids to 400 of his 955 patients enrolled in Medicare Part D. According to the most recent Census estimate, approximately 3,400 people 65 or older live alongside Abraham in Richland Parish. The year before he was elected to serve in Congress, he wrote prescriptions for opioids to the equivalent of more 10% of the parish’s Medicare eligible population or more than half of the entire population of Mangham, the town where his clinic and one of his two pharmacies were located.

To be sure, CMS does not calculate a physician’s “opioid prescriber rate” based on the number of patients who receive prescriptions against the total number of patients (in 2013, 41%); rather, its rate is calculated based on the total opioid claims divided by the total number of claims and then multiplied by 100. In 2013, Abraham’s opioid prescriber rate was 5.88%, which was about a point higher than the average among family practice doctors nationwide. So although two out of five Medicare Part D patients he treated received prescriptions for opioids, Abraham had made so many claims in total, the second most of the physicians listed in the table above, he maintained a relatively average rate.

Even while campaigning

The following year, while he campaigned for Congress and publicly championed name-brand opioids on the trail, including once during a debate televised on C-SPAN, Abraham still managed to file 1,286 opioid claims for 343 different patients with CMS. While that may have dropped him from his 11th place ranking, it wasn’t by much.

Incidentally, the man who filed more opioid claims with Medicare than any other family practice physician in Louisiana, Dr. Adrian Talbot of Slidell, also ran for office in 2014, unsuccessfully seeking to become the coroner of St. Tammany Parish. Talbot had been endorsed by St. Tammany’s Republican Parish Executive Committee and had emphasized his work in treating patients with substance abuse disorders.

Ralph Abraham takes the Oath of Office alongside his wife Dianne and former Speaker of the House John Boehner in January 2015.

CMS provides data from the years 2013 to 2018, which means we can examine the extent to which he truly “ended” his medical practice. The truth, at least based on Medicare data, seems to be that while Ralph Abraham never truly stopped practicing medicine, he has dramatically scaled back, though there’s no doubt he is continuing to practice in a new clinic in Rayville.

Last year, 2018, he filed 16 opioid claims for 15 patients.But he had still earned as much as $50,000 from his new clinic and as much as $100,000 from his pharmacy in Mangham.

Subscribe to the Bayou Brief!

Apples to Apples: A Tale of Two Pharmacies

Vetting the Doc

Nine days after the Bayou Brief published a report documenting that U.S. Rep, Ralph Abraham had owned two rural pharmacies in northeast Louisiana that had received a total of nearly 1.5 million opioid doses between the years 2006-2012, neither the congressman nor anyone formally affiliated with his office or his gubernatorial campaign have issued a single statement or disputed any of the claims in the report.

In assembling the initial report, I relied on public records and documents from a variety of sources: the Drug Enforcement Agency, the Louisiana Department of Health, the Louisiana Secretary of State, and perhaps most importantly, the Securities Litigation and Consulting Group (SLCG), which provides a free and much more comprehensive data set than the one constructed by the Washington Post. (While I had linked to the Washington Post’s data originally, I have subsequently discovered their dataset has some missing information that I accessed through SLCG, which may have created some confusion to those who did not otherwise know how to locate the raw numbers).

SLCG

SLCG, it should be noted, are working directly on this litigation, which has allowed them access to more data than any news organization. They’re more directly plugged into the database, and it makes a difference.

First and perhaps most importantly, Abraham’s pharmacy in Winnsboro, Adams Clinic Pharmacy, had three different DEA identification numbers; as of this writing, the Washington Post has only uploaded one of those sets.

Source: SLCG, DEA.

All told, Adams Clinic Pharmacy ordered 619,970 units of opioids from 2006-2012. At first glance, considering three other pharmacies in Winnsboro ordered double the amount, this may not appear notable, but Abraham had officially gone into business on Sept. 27th, 2006.

Source: Louisiana Secretary of State Corporations Database..

In other words, within only a couple of years, his pharmacy (which he co-owned with Kayla Bridges) was already dispensing half as many opioids as the nearby and significantly larger WalMart.

Abraham appears to have served as a shadow partner at the pharmacy in Winnsboro; Bridges and David Doughty of Rayville are listed as the company’s registered agents.

However, at his pharmacy in nearby Mangham, Abraham’s hometown, his involvement was much more public. He was the sole organizer, having established the business in 2003, and he is listed as one of two agents. The other was John Hoychick. Notably, in August of 2018, it appears that Kayla Bridges replaced Abraham as a registered agent, though it is unclear if he relinquished any ownership as well. His recent personal financial disclosure reports indicate he has continued to derive an income from the clinic throughout his time in Congress.

What did Abraham prescribe?

Several readers have inquired about whether it is possible to ascertain if Abraham was the prescribing physician for opioids filled at his own pharmacies. The simple answer is: Yes, it is possible, but currently, that information is not yet available to the public. Or if it is publicly available, I have yet to locate it.

Notably, in a May 2019 profile of Abraham published by the Times-Picayune, he was described as the town’s only doctor. “(Ralph Abraham) was the only doctor practicing in the area, which meant he treated men, women, children – even pets,” the paper reported.

Doc the Vet

Prior to earning his medical degree, Abraham was a veterinarian, a rare feat, and he speaks often about treating animals and people. However, Abraham actually has not been a licensed veterinarian since 2001, eighteen years ago, according to the Louisiana Board of Veterinary Medicine.

While he may have not been a licensed veterinarian, he was, prior to his election to Congress, Mangham’s only doctor. However, he wasn’t the town’s only pharmacy owner, and because of that, it is possible to do an apples to apples comparison of the two pharmacies in order to determine whether one ordered disproportionately more opioids- in a town of 638 residents- than the other.

Location! Location! Location!

Before we evaluate that data, it’s important to dispense, pardon the pun, of one of the primary criticisms I have received from the Republican gubernatorial candidate’s supporters.

In my initial report, I combined the populations of the two small towns, Mangham and Winnsboro, in which Abraham’s pharmacies were located, in order to provide a rough per capita estimate. This misrepresented the daily realities of living in a rural, sparsely populated state, critics said. Their argument goes something like this: If you live out in the country, it’s not unusual at all to have to drive fifteen, twenty, even thirty miles to get to the closest pharmacy.

Different in Richland

It’s a compelling point, and while that may certainly be the case in some areas of the country, in this case, it implicitly exaggerates both the rural populations of Richland and Franklin Parishes and the distances between the cities and towns; it also implies a severe shortage of area pharmacies.

Above: The two pharmacies owned or once owned by Rep. Ralph Abraham, Clinic Pharmacy of Mangham and Adams Clinic Pharmacy in Winnsboro. Below:The cities and towns in the region with two or more pharmacies; in blue: the route between Abraham’s two pharmacies (12.5 miles). South of Winnsboro, there are pharmacies in Gilbert (12 miles) and Sicily Island (14 miles from Gilbert).

This pocket of northeast Louisiana is definitely rural; Franklin and Richland Parishes have a combined population of slightly more than 40,000 people.

Yet the region has an ample number of pharmacies, fifteen in total (which works out to be one pharmacy per every 2,700 residents). Ten pharmacies in Richland Parish, five in Franklin Parish. And they are distributed throughout the area fairly evenly. You’re likely to encounter at least two pharmacies every fifteen miles.

Analytics

I applied a 10-mile radius around both of Abraham’s pharmacies, used Census data to determine the population from 2010, and then used data from the annual American Community Survey reports to arrive at a reasonable estimate (6,000 people). At the time, I hadn’t anticipated this would be a point of contention, but after studying the data more closely and considering the legitimate, general criticisms that some have leveled against the DEA for applying this methodology, I believe there is a better approach.

Population has to be considered, of course, but it would be disingenuous to pretend as if every single person who resides in Richland and Franklin Parishes should be counted in order to determine whether a small rural pharmacy is ordering a disproportionate supply of opioids. Regardless of what approach one takes, there will inevitably be those who disagree on what number would qualify as a “disproportionate” supply.

Almost Exclusive

As I mentioned in the first report, Abraham’s single largest, almost exclusive, distributor was the company Morris & Dickson, which controls a massive portion of the marketplace throughout the entire state. Last year, after the DEA investigated the company’s shipments of opioids and discovered around ten pharmacies who had received shipments that, in the agency’s estimation, should have set off some major red flags, they took the unusual and extreme step of suspending the company’s license.

I noted that Abraham had invited Paul Dickson, the company’s president, to be his guest at last year’s State of the Union address, and no matter how you cut it, the decision was highly unusual; this occurred during the investigation but prior to the suspension of the company’s license. Ultimately, Dickson’s company prevailed in court in having their license restored and later agreed to pay a hefty $22 million civil fine.

Ongoing Investigations

I bring this subject back up for a reason: During his appeal, which was heard by Federal District Judge Beth Foote, an Obama appointee, Dickson acknowledged the need for improving the company’s internal controls, but he also argued that pharmacies located in areas in which customers were less likely to be insured and therefore more likely to purchase their medications in cash may require maintaining a larger inventory because their customers are also more likely to buy whatever quantity they can afford whenever they can afford it.

The argument did not make any difference in determining the outcome of the case. Judge Foote ruled in favor of Dickson and against the DEA because the government was unwilling to turn over all of the evidence they had collected.

Hypothetical

Frankly, I don’t find the argument compelling and Dickson didn’t cite any specific examples; it was a hypothetical. But there will be some who believe it should be a consideration. Similarly, a pharmacist in Baton Rouge attempted to “debunk” my report on Facebook by suggesting that the only way in which one could make a determination about whether a pharmacy had an excessive supply of opioids was by considering their supply of other medications as well. But that approach misapprehends the reality of the epidemic and could obviously be easily gamed by a physician colluding with a pharmacy.

(I should note that the Baton Rouge pharmacist, a man I do not know, was suspicious from the beginning, leaving a long and rambling refutation that sounded an awful lot like campaign double-talk, then falsely claiming his comment had been deleted as a pretense to share screen captures of our exchange. Not surprisingly, after I suggested we speak personally so that I could better understand his argument, he was evasive, and the comment was later used by Scott McKay, a conservative operative paid by the Abraham campaign, to frame a blogpost on his website, the Hayride).

The Mangham Opioid War

Mangham Rx, the competing pharmacy.

With all of that now in mind, let’s look specifically at Abraham’s pharmacy in Mangham, not only because it was the one in which he ostensibly had the most direct involvement but also because we can directly compare it with his one and only competitor in town, Mangham Rx.

Owned by David Paul Gibson of Rayville, Mangham Rx opened four years before Abraham’s pharmacy. Based on the raw data, only one of these men seems to have cornered the local market for opioid prescriptions.

Source: SLCG, DEA

Note the scale may appear to be the same, but look closely: It’s not.

There’s definitely an obvious winner, or, perhaps better put, a biggest loser. During the same seven-year period, Ralph Abraham’s pharmacy ordered more than double the number of opioids as the owner of Mangham Rx.

They ordered roughly the same quantities of OxyContin, but Abraham’s pharmacy dominated the market on hydrocodone.

Exceeded the National Average

In all seven consecutive years, Abraham’s pharmacy’s supply of opioids exceeded the national average, while Mangham Rx consistently ranked under it. To be sure, Abraham never exceeded the state average, but that’s hardly an accomplishment. The state average is already excessive, and remember, Mangham, Louisiana is a town of 638 people. And, for many of those years, Abraham was the only doctor in town.

Winnsboro (population 4,652), with their five pharmacies, is 12 miles south, and Rayville (population 3,574), with their four pharmacies, is 12 miles to the north. But let’s give little ol’ Mangham the benefit of the doubt and draw a ten mile radius around each of its two pharmacies, generously assuming that even if you live closer to a bigger town with more options, you do all of your shopping in Mangham; you simply can’t resist the charm of Mangham.

At the very most, there are 2,274 people living within ten miles of both pharmacies.

Source: LSCG, DEA

In Richland Parish (population 20,411), in a town in which he was its only doctor, Ralph Abraham’s pharmacy, which has slightly more than 10% of the parish’s population living within ten miles (and that’s also being generous, considering the proximity of Franklin Parish), was the fourth-largest purchaser of opioids.

Ralph Abraham’s pharmacy in Mangham is 0.7 miles away from its closest competitor.

If you’re eagle-eyed, you may note a slight but ultimately insignificant difference between the numbers culled from the Washington Post and those from SLCG. Again, SLCG’s database is more comprehensive, and although I have been using the data they collect directly from the DEA, I directed readers to the Washington Post, which has done an incredible job reporting on the opioid epidemic. I encourage readers to examine both databases; I imagine you’ll reach the same conclusion.

Corrections

For the purposes of reporting the facts about Ralph Abraham’s pharmacy in Mangham, there are a couple of numbers that need to be corrected. Yesterday, I shared an infograph I created by juxtaposing two screenshots: The Washington Post’s datasheet on Ralph Abraham’s Mangham pharmacy and Mangham Rx’s datasheet.

Both documents contained estimates that undercounted the quantity of opioids the two pharmacies had ordered during the seven-year timeframe.

This is the updated and correct infographic:


Subscribe to the Bayou Brief!

Launching Into a Diatribe

A Rambling Note from the Publisher: Nearly 14 years ago, when I launched my former website CenLamar, which was initially concerned with the politics of Central Louisiana, I was essentially alone in the wilderness (incidentally, that’s how many folks in Louisiana define any place north of Interstate 10). Fortunately, though, after a few months of writing into the darkness, I connected with a community of bloggers from New Orleans. By one estimate, in the aftermath of the Federal Flood, there were as many as 350 blogs published by New Orleanians; it didn’t take too long before they counted me in their number, even though I lived in a part of the state that probably seemed like a foreign country.

Peter Athas, a.k.a. Adrastos, was not only one of its most distinctive voices; he was also a part of the glue that held this makeshift virtual community together. And it’s hard to overstate how important online writers like Peter were in building back their physical community as well. As I’ve written before, today, most of those bloggers from the immediate post-K years have since moved on or passed away, but Peter, like me, is not really a blogger; he’s a writer. And he’s relentless.

Thankfully for me, Peter has been contributing to the Bayou Brief since we turned on the lights, and even though I now live in New Orleans, my work primarily focuses on the other 63 parishes. Peter, however, is a subject matter expert on New Orleans, so when he recently suggested carving out a his own corner here, I didn’t hesitate. He will explain the name, 13th Ward Rambler, but I should explain why I chose the title “Launching Into a Diatribe.”

Once every two weeks, Peter will use this space to write, rant, maunder, and occasionally palaver about whatever or whomever earns his ire or deserves his praise. And fair warning: If you’re an adult human being who is offended by those who employ occasional f-bombs, don’t bother writing me to complain. Peter curses. He also has a more robust vocabulary than almost everyone I know, which shouldn’t be too surprising. As the website Science Alert noted, a recent “study found that those who have a healthy repertoire of curse words at their disposal are more likely to have a richer vocabulary than those who don’t.” But I digress.

I selected the word “diatribe” to describe this debut, because as anyone who has read Peter’s work already knows, Peter’s heritage is Greek. And “diatribe” is a Greek word whose original meaning- the profession of studying- was altered by the French in 1804– the year after they sold Louisiana to Thomas Jefferson- to mean “a strain of invective, a bitter and violent criticism.” I think both definitions describe Peter’s work, and that’s a compliment. Peter is a critic and a satirist, because he does his homework.

One more thing: I want to personally echo Peter’s words of appreciation to the folks at Big Easy Magazine for their decision to report on Drew Brees’ alliance with the anti-LGBTQ group Focus on the Family. I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt, because off the field, we know he’s had to contend with people who have deceived and misled him. For example, he “invested” $15 million on a collection of jewelry that was actually worth $6 million (which is ultimately what a jury awarded him). He may need to make some personnel changes, and he definitely needs to answer questions about associating his good name with a bigoted organization. Finish strong, Drew.

Lamar White, Jr. | Publisher, Bayou Brief

Bordered by Napoleon Avenue, Jefferson Avenue, S. Broad, and the Mississippi River, the 13th Ward was annexed into New Orleans in 1870.

I love writing for the Bayou Brief; so much so that I’ve decided to do it more regularly. Irregularity is bad for one: Don’t worry, while I’m not above terlet humor, I’ll skip it here.

Welcome to my new biweekly column, 13th Ward Rambler. I selected that name because I want my neighborhood to receive the sort of shout-out it used to get in Neville Brothers songs when Art and Charles lived in the 13th Ward. Additionally, it evokes the old New Orleans song Didn’t He Ramble. Speaking of shout-outs, the name was suggested by my friend, Stephanie Stokes.

You hear a lot about the 9th and 7th Wards but I’m proud of my neighborhood. The 13th Ward is where the Wild Tchoupitoulas tribe was founded; my neighbors include musicians such as Deacon John and Joe Krown. It’s gentrifying but we’re trying to stay funky.

Sometimes I’ll focus on one topic, other times it will be a crazy quilt of segments about the aspects of the Gret Stet of Louisiana that interest me, especially the heart of weirdness: New Orleans. I may even sneak some national politics by my editor. Oops, I have a big mouth. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain, Lamar. I hope the gaslighting worked. It’s fashionable in certain circles right now.

Two of the topics in this inaugural column are somewhat long in the tooth but I haven’t written about them here and I want to share. Yikes, that makes this sound like a book report. What’s a bit of August news in September among friends? Besides, I’m a pundit not a reporter. I leave that to my colleagues. Lamar and Sue who have really been rocking it.

In addition to my interest in film, music, politics, carnival, and the media, I’m a sports fan. I admit to having some reservations about football in the Concussion/CTE era, so I’ve focused my fandom on the LSU Tigers and New Orleans Saints.

We begin our journey with a focus on Saints QB Drew Brees’ unfortunate relationship with Focus on the Family.

Drew Brees: Wingnut Or Conservative?

I’ve long been aware of Drew Brees’ conservative politics, but I’d never thought of him as a hater. I may have to modify that view with the revelation that he recorded this video for Focus on the Family:

Thanks to our friends at Big Easy Magazine for unearthing that clip.

The video’s content is superficially innocuous but the company that the future Hall of Famer keeps is insalubrious to say the least. The Focus on the Family fucks are mainstays of the homophobic backlash that’s been building since the Supreme Court upheld gay marriage in 2015. The same backlash, of course, gave us Donald Trump for whom I have a plethora of nicknames that are in frequent use at First Draft: the Insult Comedian, the Kaiser of Chaos, Trumpberius, and the latest entrant President* Pennywise. End of the first of many digressions in this and future columns. Get used to it, y’all. I’ll do my share of cursing as well.

Back to Focus on the Family, hereinafter FOTF.

It was founded in 1977 by James Dobson who has always had an interest in sports. He essentially claims that Gret Stet hoops great Pistol Pete Maravich died in his arms; sounds like a suspicious death to me. #sarcasm

FOTF has had a relationship with Drew Brees since at least 2015 when the Brees family was profiled on FOTF’s web site. Again, the content is innocuous, but the company is ominous. For example, FOFT believes in conversion therapy. Ugh, ugh, ugh.

Here’s how the Human Rights Committee Campaign describes Drew’s strange bedfellows:

“Focus On The Family has raised over $515 Million over the past five years, making it one of the most well-funded anti-LGBTQ organizations in America. They invest in public education campaigns against LGBTQ equality, while their related organization Citizen Link supports radical anti-LGBTQ candidates who work against basic civil rights and legal protections.”

I suggest you read their top ten list about FOTF. The HRC classifies FOTF as a hate group. That’s not nice.

To be fair to Brees, it’s possible that he neither supports nor is aware of FOTF’s most extreme positions. But I think the question should be posed to him. I’m a believer in transparency. It’s better for this to be out there instead of being the subject of social media speculation. It’s rampant as of this writing. The Twitteratti love their gossip. They’re surprised by this. I’m not.

Does this alter my Saints fandom? Hell, no. Football is full of right-wing white boys and I’ve known for years that Drew Brees is one of them. Besides, his views on the Kaepernick kneeling contretemps were more nuanced than expected; he even criticized President* Trump. That’s why I have no plan to renounce my Saints fandom or return my tickets for the season opener.

I simply want to know if our QB is a wingnut or a conservative.

Let’s move on to a collision between Gret Stet politics and a New Orleans cultural institution.

The Lieutenant Governor Wore Lederhosen: 

I’m sorry if I’ve seared the image of Billy Nungesser in leather shorts on your brains. It was thoughtless but I’d do it again. I’m uncertain as to whether Nungesser has ever donned that Teutonic garment, but it was a funny segment title, so I ran with it.

Deutsches Haus is best known for its Oktoberfest festivities, beer, and the chicken dance. They claim to be non-political but it’s unclear if they’re even-handed in that regard:

“The Musicians’ Clinic, which provides free and low-cost preventive health services to musicians, had invited several community health partners to its sixth annual blood drive at the Deutsches Haus facility.

However, within an hour of setting up a table aimed at raising awareness of its services, the New Orleans Abortion Fund, which offers low-income women financial assistance for abortions, was asked to leave.

Erica Dudas, the managing director of the New Orleans Musicians Assistance Fund that was hosting the event, said two of the members of Deutsches Haus made the request, citing a club policy that bars politically charged groups from holding events there. Because the space was donated and there was no contract for its use, Dudas said, she felt she had to comply.

“Due to their policy of not having any hot-button political topics…. they asked me to ask them to leave,” she said. “The Abortion Fund left without protest or incident, she said.”

It turns out that the policy was not even-handed. The Twittering classes, myself included, recalled seeing David Duke and Steve Scalise in der haus during campaign season. That brings us to Billy Nungesser who’s running for re-election this year:

“On social media, several users pointed to an event on Sept. 4 to be presented by Deutsches Haus and Lt. Gov. Billy Nungesser, who is up for reelection this fall.

“That does not square with political neutrality,” said Peter Athas, a political blogger who visited Deutsches Haus for Oktoberfest when it was based in Jefferson Parish.

Julie Samson, Nungesser’s chief of staff, confirmed that he plans to host a dinner for Deutsches Haus with chef John Folse. She said Nungesser was asked by Deutsches Haus to host the event.”

The Nungesser dinner has come and gone but I had to post that passage since I was quoted therein. I think my quote was trimmed because, while I recalled seeing our little buddy Steve Scalise there during campaign season in Jefferson, I was not certain that he was campaigning thereby proving that I do strive for accuracy my reputation as a satirist notwithstanding. Apologies for that epic sentence. I never said I was Hemingway. I look rotten in a mustache…

I think it would be wise for Deutsches Haus to avoid events involving politicians except in their official capacity and to be even-handed in their treatment of groups and their causes. They appear to be a right-leaning group in a left-leaning city. I realize that it’s difficult to be even-handed in the Trump era, but they should live up to their stated policy.

One more thing: if Deutsches Haus has another event involving Billy Nungesser they should require him to wear lederhosen and post the pictures online. You may not want to see it, but I certainly do. Why? I’ll never know.

Finally, let’s take a quick look at the most pressing issue in New Orleans right now: drainage.

Cars In The Canal:

I’m lucky. The 13th Ward lies smack dab in the middle of what locals call the sliver by the river. We didn’t flood after Katrina and the Federal Flood and we haven’t flooded subsequently. Consider my fingers permanently crossed because weird places have flooded in the last few years. But if the 13th Ward floods, we’re all going down. I guess that makes us canaries in a dank coal mine or some such shit.

I don’t believe that drainage is the only reason parts of New Orleans flood. Climate change is clearly a factor, flash flood causing rain used to be rare, not a monthly occurrence. Then there’s this:

That’s right, that car has been in the drink since August 2005. Try as we might, we can never escape the legacy of Katrina and the Federal Flood. We can, however, be grateful for one thing: meter maids aren’t diving in the canals and giving out tickets. Ticketing cars is one of the things New Orleans city government excels at. I am adamantly opposed to meter maids morphing into mermaids.

That concludes the inaugural edition of 13thth Ward Rambler. I hope I didn’t ramble too much.

Since I went on about both houses (Deutches and otherwise) and the 13th Ward, the last word goes to my neighbor Deacon John with his recent cover of a Crowded House song: